Re: [gentoo-dev] Why adding python3_8 to Gentoo sucks?

On Sat, 2019-11-16 at 14:55 +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, 15 Nov 2019, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > > Two things on that page are outright wrong: > > 1. If the package has stable keywords, they should be moved to the > > new revision without dropping. To commit the ebuild,

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-misc/rioutil

# Aaron Bauman (2019-11-16) # EAPI=4. If anyone has this hardware then speak up. # Removal in 15 days app-misc/rioutil -- Cheers, Aaron signature.asc Description: PGP

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: sys-firmware/iwl1000-ucode

On Sat, Nov 16, 2019 at 9:08 AM Michael 'veremitz' Everitt wrote: > > On 16/11/19 16:59, Matt Turner wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 16, 2019 at 1:06 AM Jaco Kroon wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> On 2019/11/15 21:35, Matt Turner wrote: > >>> On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 2:20 AM Ulrich Mueller wrote: > The

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-misc/toilet

# Aaron Bauman (2019-11-16) # EAPI=4. --filter=gay Really?! # Removal in 15 days app-misc/toilet -- Cheers, Aaron signature.asc Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-util/ccglue

# Aaron Bauman (2019-11-16) # EAPI=4 and fails to build dev-util/ccglue -- Cheers, Aaron signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-misc/toilet

On Sat, Nov 16, 2019 at 08:29:58PM -0500, Aaron Bauman wrote: > # Aaron Bauman (2019-11-16) > # EAPI=4. --filter=gay Really?! > # Removal in 15 days > app-misc/toilet > > -- > Cheers, > Aaron Add the following as it is an rdep net-irc/rbot -- Cheers, Aaron signature.asc Description: PGP

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-misc/toilet

On 17/11/19 02:07, Aaron Bauman wrote: > On Sat, Nov 16, 2019 at 08:29:58PM -0500, Aaron Bauman wrote: >> # Aaron Bauman (2019-11-16) >> # EAPI=4. --filter=gay Really?! >> # Removal in 15 days >> app-misc/toilet >> >> -- >> Cheers, >> Aaron > Add the following as it is an rdep > > net-irc/rbot >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: sys-firmware/iwl1000-ucode

Hi, On 2019/11/15 21:35, Matt Turner wrote: > On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 2:20 AM Ulrich Mueller wrote: >> The package is somewhat redundant, because sys-kernel/linux-firmware >> installs the same files. (Same for all other sys-firmware/iwl*-ucode >> packages.) > Should last-rite all of them, IMO. >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: sys-firmware/iwl1000-ucode

[2019-11-16 11:05:54+0200] Jaco Kroon: > On 2019/11/15 21:35, Matt Turner wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 2:20 AM Ulrich Mueller wrote: > >> The package is somewhat redundant, because sys-kernel/linux-firmware > >> installs the same files. (Same for all other sys-firmware/iwl*-ucode > >>

Re: [gentoo-dev] Why adding python3_8 to Gentoo sucks?

On Fri, 2019-11-15 at 09:05 +0100, Michał Górny wrote: > On Wed, 2019-11-13 at 22:16 +0100, Michał Górny wrote: > > I'd like to share my frustration at the state of Python in general, > > and Python packages in Gentoo. So I'd like to 'bootstrap' python3_8 -- > > that is, add it to the most common

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 2/3] distutils-r1.eclass: distutils_enable_tests, handle no deps better

On Fri, 2019-11-15 at 17:35 +0100, Michał Górny wrote: > Do not set IUSE or other variables if the test runner does not have > any deps, and RDEPEND is empty. > > Signed-off-by: Michał Górny > --- > eclass/distutils-r1.eclass | 23 --- > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 11

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] distutils-r1.eclass: Add tests for distutils_enable_tests

Signed-off-by: Michał Górny --- eclass/tests/distutils-r1.sh | 67 +++- 1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/eclass/tests/distutils-r1.sh b/eclass/tests/distutils-r1.sh index d557f6cad534..d5f3e2812ca4 100755 ---

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] distutils-r1.eclass: distutils_enable_tests, add 'setup.py' option

Signed-off-by: Michał Górny --- eclass/distutils-r1.eclass | 6 ++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) Changed in v2: added '--verbose' to setup.py call diff --git a/eclass/distutils-r1.eclass b/eclass/distutils-r1.eclass index e2cd076d4148..63e77bf014c1 100644 --- a/eclass/distutils-r1.eclass

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: sys-firmware/iwl1000-ucode

On Sat, Nov 16, 2019 at 1:06 AM Jaco Kroon wrote: > > Hi, > > On 2019/11/15 21:35, Matt Turner wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 2:20 AM Ulrich Mueller wrote: > >> The package is somewhat redundant, because sys-kernel/linux-firmware > >> installs the same files. (Same for all other

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: sys-firmware/iwl1000-ucode

On 16/11/19 16:59, Matt Turner wrote: > On Sat, Nov 16, 2019 at 1:06 AM Jaco Kroon wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 2019/11/15 21:35, Matt Turner wrote: >>> On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 2:20 AM Ulrich Mueller wrote: The package is somewhat redundant, because sys-kernel/linux-firmware installs the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Why adding python3_8 to Gentoo sucks?

> On Fri, 15 Nov 2019, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > Two things on that page are outright wrong: > 1. If the package has stable keywords, they should be moved to the > new revision without dropping. To commit the ebuild, repoman > commit --straight-to-stable option should be used. >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: sys-firmware/iwl1000-ucode

Hi, On 2019/11/16 19:08, Michael 'veremitz' Everitt wrote: > On 16/11/19 16:59, Matt Turner wrote: >> On Sat, Nov 16, 2019 at 1:06 AM Jaco Kroon wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On 2019/11/15 21:35, Matt Turner wrote: On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 2:20 AM Ulrich Mueller wrote: > The package is