Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH 1/1] Revert "repoman: deprecate netsurf.eclass."
On 8/14/20 2:43 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > This reverts commit a73024729860f9224b8d1660d24c450080b67d9f. This > eclass was successfully purged from the tree, so the deprecation is no > longer needed. And eventually, to address an eblit infestation, > another eclass with the same name will return. The new one will not be > deprecated. > > Signed-off-by: Michael Orlitzky > --- > repoman/lib/repoman/modules/linechecks/deprecated/inherit.py | 1 - > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/repoman/lib/repoman/modules/linechecks/deprecated/inherit.py > b/repoman/lib/repoman/modules/linechecks/deprecated/inherit.py > index 60410347b..5848a0c37 100644 > --- a/repoman/lib/repoman/modules/linechecks/deprecated/inherit.py > +++ b/repoman/lib/repoman/modules/linechecks/deprecated/inherit.py > @@ -33,7 +33,6 @@ class InheritDeprecated(LineCheck): > "gst-plugins10": "gstreamer", > "ltprune": False, > "mono": "mono-env", > - "netsurf": False, > "python": "python-r1 / python-single-r1 / python-any-r1", > "ruby": "ruby-ng", > "user": "GLEP 81", > Thanks, merged: https://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj/portage.git/commit/?id=336df196217d8907788567a0349270348041657e -- Thanks, Zac signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH 1/1] Revert "repoman: deprecate netsurf.eclass."
This reverts commit a73024729860f9224b8d1660d24c450080b67d9f. This eclass was successfully purged from the tree, so the deprecation is no longer needed. And eventually, to address an eblit infestation, another eclass with the same name will return. The new one will not be deprecated. Signed-off-by: Michael Orlitzky --- repoman/lib/repoman/modules/linechecks/deprecated/inherit.py | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/repoman/lib/repoman/modules/linechecks/deprecated/inherit.py b/repoman/lib/repoman/modules/linechecks/deprecated/inherit.py index 60410347b..5848a0c37 100644 --- a/repoman/lib/repoman/modules/linechecks/deprecated/inherit.py +++ b/repoman/lib/repoman/modules/linechecks/deprecated/inherit.py @@ -33,7 +33,6 @@ class InheritDeprecated(LineCheck): "gst-plugins10": "gstreamer", "ltprune": False, "mono": "mono-env", - "netsurf": False, "python": "python-r1 / python-single-r1 / python-any-r1", "ruby": "ruby-ng", "user": "GLEP 81", -- 2.26.2
[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs: dev-util/cgdb
Dear all the following packages are up for grabs after retirement of the proxied maintainer: dev-util/cgdb https://packages.gentoo.org/packages/dev-util/cgdb Many open bugs, perhaps it can not even compile properly. Bump could fix some ticket. Please take care of this package, if you want to prevent that it will be dropped soon. -- Best, Jonas signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] profile masking
On Fri, 2020-08-14 at 15:42 +, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > On Fri, 2020-08-14 at 17:31 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > > > > > > On Fri, 14 Aug 2020, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > > When pkgs are masked in the profile, it affects all variants of that > > > pkgs, even the ones that are in other overlays. > > > Example: > > > !!! The following installed packages are masked: > > > - sys-auth/sssd-::transmode (masked by: package.mask) > > > /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask: > > > # Matt Turner (2020-08-13) > > > # Masked for testing > > > My sssd- is now masked. > > > Could the profile syntax be extended to include syntax allowed in > > > /etc/portage ? Then one could use the ::gentoo syntax (or so I hope) > > > > The :: syntax is Portage specific and doesn't exist in EAPI 7. > > So there's no chance to get it into the profile dir anytime soon > > (because that would imply :: to be added to a future EAPI and the > > top-level profile dir to be bumped to that EAPI). > > Is profile part of EAPI? masks are not defined/used in ebuilds directly. > > > You could override the mask in your overlay's profile/package.mask > > instead, using an entry with the "-" operator. > > Yes, I know I can add that in profile/package.mask but I am looking for the > bigger > picture here. This has to stop somehow, there need to be something that limits > the mask scope to the repo/overlay it is defined. > Why is that? I dare say the bigger picture needs to include different mask reasons. Sure, 'masked for testing' may or may not make little sense for live ebuilds. However, 'masked for security issues' may pretty apply to custom repo ebuilds as well. -- Best regards, Michał Górny signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] profile masking
On 8/14/20 1:42 PM, Zac Medico wrote: > On 8/14/20 1:08 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >>> On Fri, 14 Aug 2020, Zac Medico wrote: >> >>> On 8/14/20 8:42 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: Yes, I know I can add that in profile/package.mask but I am looking for the bigger picture here. This has to stop somehow, there need to be something that limits the mask scope to the repo/overlay it is defined. >> >>> The scope is already limited, but this overlay inherits the mask because >>> it has the gentoo repo as its master (either implicitly or via a masters >>> setting in metadata/layout.conf). >> >>> I suppose we could add an option to prevent this inheritance. >> >> Like an option in repos.conf or layout.conf? >> >> The problem I see with this is that preventing inheritance would disable >> files like license_groups or thirdpartymirrors. So overlays would have >> to maintain their own versions. > > I've just tested, and it's possible to do this with a -* at the top of > the overlay/profiles/package.mask file, if we simply modify the the > grabfile_package function to allow the -* pass through (it currently > discards it as an invalid atom). Opened this bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/737148 -- Thanks, Zac signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] profile masking
On 8/14/20 1:08 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >> On Fri, 14 Aug 2020, Zac Medico wrote: > >> On 8/14/20 8:42 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: >>> Yes, I know I can add that in profile/package.mask but I am looking >>> for the bigger picture here. This has to stop somehow, there need to >>> be something that limits the mask scope to the repo/overlay it is >>> defined. > >> The scope is already limited, but this overlay inherits the mask because >> it has the gentoo repo as its master (either implicitly or via a masters >> setting in metadata/layout.conf). > >> I suppose we could add an option to prevent this inheritance. > > Like an option in repos.conf or layout.conf? > > The problem I see with this is that preventing inheritance would disable > files like license_groups or thirdpartymirrors. So overlays would have > to maintain their own versions. I've just tested, and it's possible to do this with a -* at the top of the overlay/profiles/package.mask file, if we simply modify the the grabfile_package function to allow the -* pass through (it currently discards it as an invalid atom). >>> I think a good start would be to consider /etc/portage the top >>> profile and other subprofiles should be able to use the same features >>> as /etc/portage. >>> >>> Portage could start supporting that now, but there would be a while >>> until one can use them in Gentoo profile. > >> We've got this bug open for the ::repo atom support: > >> https://bugs.gentoo.org/651208 > > I still believe that adding ::gentoo to every line in package.mask would > be the wrong approach to the problem. Of course, that would be silly. The per-repo package.mask scoping is actually implemented internally by adding an implicit ::repo to each atom in the package.mask file. -- Thanks, Zac signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] profile masking
> On Fri, 14 Aug 2020, Zac Medico wrote: > On 8/14/20 8:42 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: >> Yes, I know I can add that in profile/package.mask but I am looking >> for the bigger picture here. This has to stop somehow, there need to >> be something that limits the mask scope to the repo/overlay it is >> defined. > The scope is already limited, but this overlay inherits the mask because > it has the gentoo repo as its master (either implicitly or via a masters > setting in metadata/layout.conf). > I suppose we could add an option to prevent this inheritance. Like an option in repos.conf or layout.conf? The problem I see with this is that preventing inheritance would disable files like license_groups or thirdpartymirrors. So overlays would have to maintain their own versions. >> I think a good start would be to consider /etc/portage the top >> profile and other subprofiles should be able to use the same features >> as /etc/portage. >> >> Portage could start supporting that now, but there would be a while >> until one can use them in Gentoo profile. > We've got this bug open for the ::repo atom support: > https://bugs.gentoo.org/651208 I still believe that adding ::gentoo to every line in package.mask would be the wrong approach to the problem. Ulrich
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] profile masking
On 8/14/20 8:42 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > On Fri, 2020-08-14 at 17:31 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >>> On Fri, 14 Aug 2020, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: >> >>> When pkgs are masked in the profile, it affects all variants of that >>> pkgs, even the ones that are in other overlays. >>> Example: >>> !!! The following installed packages are masked: >>> - sys-auth/sssd-::transmode (masked by: package.mask) >>> /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask: >>> # Matt Turner (2020-08-13) >>> # Masked for testing >> >>> My sssd- is now masked. >> >>> Could the profile syntax be extended to include syntax allowed in >>> /etc/portage ? Then one could use the ::gentoo syntax (or so I hope) >> >> The :: syntax is Portage specific and doesn't exist in EAPI 7. >> So there's no chance to get it into the profile dir anytime soon >> (because that would imply :: to be added to a future EAPI and the >> top-level profile dir to be bumped to that EAPI). > > Is profile part of EAPI? masks are not defined/used in ebuilds directly. > >> >> You could override the mask in your overlay's profile/package.mask >> instead, using an entry with the "-" operator. > > Yes, I know I can add that in profile/package.mask but I am looking for the > bigger > picture here. This has to stop somehow, there need to be something that limits > the mask scope to the repo/overlay it is defined. The scope is already limited, but this overlay inherits the mask because it has the gentoo repo as its master (either implicitly or via a masters setting in metadata/layout.conf). I suppose we could add an option to prevent this inheritance. > I think a good start would be to consider /etc/portage the top profile and > other > subprofiles should be able to use the same features as /etc/portage. > > Portage could start supporting that now, but there would be a while until > one can use them in Gentoo profile. We've got this bug open for the ::repo atom support: https://bugs.gentoo.org/651208 -- Thanks, Zac signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs: sys-kernel/dracut-crypt-ssh
Dear all the following packages are up for grabs after retirement of the proxied maintainer: sys-kernel/dracut-crypt-ssh https://packages.gentoo.org/packages/sys-kernel/dracut-crypt-ssh -- Best, Jonas signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] profile masking
On Fri, 2020-08-14 at 17:31 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, 14 Aug 2020, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > > When pkgs are masked in the profile, it affects all variants of that > > pkgs, even the ones that are in other overlays. > > Example: > > !!! The following installed packages are masked: > > - sys-auth/sssd-::transmode (masked by: package.mask) > > /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask: > > # Matt Turner (2020-08-13) > > # Masked for testing > > > My sssd- is now masked. > > > Could the profile syntax be extended to include syntax allowed in > > /etc/portage ? Then one could use the ::gentoo syntax (or so I hope) > > The :: syntax is Portage specific and doesn't exist in EAPI 7. > So there's no chance to get it into the profile dir anytime soon > (because that would imply :: to be added to a future EAPI and the > top-level profile dir to be bumped to that EAPI). Is profile part of EAPI? masks are not defined/used in ebuilds directly. > > You could override the mask in your overlay's profile/package.mask > instead, using an entry with the "-" operator. Yes, I know I can add that in profile/package.mask but I am looking for the bigger picture here. This has to stop somehow, there need to be something that limits the mask scope to the repo/overlay it is defined. I think a good start would be to consider /etc/portage the top profile and other subprofiles should be able to use the same features as /etc/portage. Portage could start supporting that now, but there would be a while until one can use them in Gentoo profile. Meanwhile one should ban masks containing > and instead use exact revision of the package. Jocke
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] profile masking
> On Fri, 14 Aug 2020, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > When pkgs are masked in the profile, it affects all variants of that > pkgs, even the ones that are in other overlays. > Example: > !!! The following installed packages are masked: > - sys-auth/sssd-::transmode (masked by: package.mask) > /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask: > # Matt Turner (2020-08-13) > # Masked for testing > My sssd- is now masked. > Could the profile syntax be extended to include syntax allowed in > /etc/portage ? Then one could use the ::gentoo syntax (or so I hope) The :: syntax is Portage specific and doesn't exist in EAPI 7. So there's no chance to get it into the profile dir anytime soon (because that would imply :: to be added to a future EAPI and the top-level profile dir to be bumped to that EAPI). You could override the mask in your overlay's profile/package.mask instead, using an entry with the "-" operator. Ulrich signature.asc Description: PGP signature
[gentoo-portage-dev] profile masking
When pkgs are masked in the profile, it affects all variants of that pkgs, even the ones that are in other overlays. Example: !!! The following installed packages are masked: - sys-auth/sssd-::transmode (masked by: package.mask) /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask: # Matt Turner (2020-08-13) # Masked for testing My sssd- is now masked. Could the profile syntax be extended to include syntax allowed in /etc/portage ? Then one could use the ::gentoo syntax (or so I hope) Jocke
