Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Refactor display manager openrc init scripts to independent package

2020-10-10 Thread Aisha Tammy
On 10/10/20 8:00 AM, Joonas Niilola wrote: > > On 10/10/20 1:57 PM, Aisha Tammy wrote: >> Hi all, >>   This change is for OpenRC init scripts only. >>   Currently the way our display managers are started, is by using the >> xdm init script present in the xorg-base/xorg-server package, with its >>

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Refactor display manager openrc init scripts to independent package

2020-10-10 Thread Joonas Niilola
On 10/10/20 1:57 PM, Aisha Tammy wrote: > Hi all, >   This change is for OpenRC init scripts only. >   Currently the way our display managers are started, is by using the > xdm init script present in the xorg-base/xorg-server package, with its > script > dependencies spread across four other

[gentoo-dev] [RFC] Refactor display manager openrc init scripts to independent package

2020-10-10 Thread Aisha Tammy
Hi all,   This change is for OpenRC init scripts only.   Currently the way our display managers are started, is by using the xdm init script present in the xorg-base/xorg-server package, with its script dependencies spread across four other packages, without any logical separation. This makes it

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Refactor display manager openrc init scripts to independent package

2020-10-10 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Sat, 10 Oct 2020, Aisha Tammy wrote: > On 10/10/20 8:00 AM, Joonas Niilola wrote: >>>  - xdm init.d is replaced by display-manager init.d script >> >> Why this rename? I can't find a reason for that. >> > The name change was to make it clear that its separate from xorg-server > as it

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/5] verify-sig.eclass: New eclass to verify OpenPGP sigs

2020-10-10 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
Hi, I am really unhappy with this addition. Another example for something that was not thought to the end and which was rushed and pushed to our users. Sorry for being late to this but any addition should really add a benefit. What is the benefit verify-sig is adding? When mgorny started

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/5] verify-sig.eclass: New eclass to verify OpenPGP sigs

2020-10-10 Thread Michał Górny
On Sat, 2020-10-10 at 22:10 +0200, Thomas Deutschmann wrote: > Another example for something that was not thought to the end and which > was rushed and pushed to our users. You start this mail with an insult to me. Why do you keep doing this? Do you feel that there is some special need for you

Re: [gentoo-dev] tagging deprecated eclasses internally

2020-10-10 Thread Tim Harder
On 2020-09-26 Sat 05:23, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > IIUC the authoritative document for eclass documentation is the > description of the format in the eclass-to-manpage.awk script, so this > would be a good start to add support for a new tag. Initial awk implementation available at [1], but

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Refactor display manager openrc init scripts to independent package

2020-10-10 Thread Aisha Tammy
On 10/10/20 2:18 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >> On Sat, 10 Oct 2020, Aisha Tammy wrote: > >> On 10/10/20 8:00 AM, Joonas Niilola wrote:  - xdm init.d is replaced by display-manager init.d script >>> >>> Why this rename? I can't find a reason for that. >>> >> The name change was to make it

[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: introduce RUST_TARGETS use-expand

2020-10-10 Thread Georgy Yakovlev
On 10/10/20 7:17 PM, Georgy Yakovlev wrote: Hi, Sorry, thunderbird used personal mailfrom for some reason. Probably an issue after update. OpenPGP_0xA5EDB076475B46A6.asc Description: application/pgp-keys OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[gentoo-dev] RFC: introduce RUST_TARGETS use-expand (take2)

2020-10-10 Thread Georgy Yakovlev
Hi, sending again, accidentally sent from personal email first time and it's stuck somewhere. I would like to introduce new USE_EXPAND in profiles for rusts 3 consumers in the tree: dev-lang/rust dev-lang/rust-bin sys-devel/rust-std and maybe virtual, but not sure yet, may be required for