Re: [gentoo-dev] Deprecating AMD64 17.0 profiles?

2020-11-09 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 09-11-2020 19:38:28 +, Alexey Sokolov wrote: > Hi Fabian > I tried to migrate my prefix to 17.1, and there are issues. > > 1) unsymlink-lib requires "--root ~/gentoo" and otherwise produces an > error "/usr/lib is a real directory! was the migration done already?" I think unsymlink-lib doe

[gentoo-dev] Python 3.8 migration reminder

2020-11-09 Thread Michał Górny
Hello, developers. The Python team would like to remind you that the switch to Python 3.8 as the default target is planned for 2020-12-01. Please make sure to migrate your packages to give our users a better transition experience. The migration list is at [1], stabilization is at [2]. In other

Re: [gentoo-dev] Deprecating AMD64 17.0 profiles?

2020-11-09 Thread Alexey Sokolov
07.11.2020 12:56, Fabian Groffen пишет: > On 07-11-2020 11:42:44 +, Alexey Sokolov wrote: >> 22.10.2020 20:16, Andreas K. Hüttel пишет: >>> Am Donnerstag, 22. Oktober 2020, 18:44:48 EEST schrieb Michał Górny: On Thu, 2020-10-22 at 11:17 -0400, Brian Evans wrote: > Users frequently are

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/1] depend.apache.eclass: support EAPI-7

2020-11-09 Thread Marek Szuba
On 2020-11-03 20:04, Michael Orlitzky wrote: It's likely broken in EAPI=7, because it was in EAPI=6:   https://bugs.gentoo.org/616612 I left a comment there with a proposal for how to fix it, but I haven't thought about it much since then. Indeed, by default this is broken - but in exactly

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages & projects up for grabs due to jer's retirement

2020-11-09 Thread Joonas Niilola
On 11/9/20 5:59 PM, Kent Fredric wrote: > Historical context probably matters here. > > That's a very old statement. > > Partly from the era when Gentoo was "cool" and when "ricing" was a thing. > > At the time, upstream was inundated with absurd requests like "oh noes, > I disabled CXX Exception

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages & projects up for grabs due to jer's retirement

2020-11-09 Thread Kent Fredric
On Mon, 9 Nov 2020 12:15:07 +0200 Jaco Kroon wrote: > You mentioned working raport with upstream?  Can we rely on that to at > the very least get them to update that to "due to the way Gentoo > functions we request that you first file issues with the Gentoo > repository rather than directly with

Re: [gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2020-11-08 23:59 UTC

2020-11-09 Thread Alec Warner
On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 2:24 AM Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > On Mon, 09 Nov 2020, Robin H Johnson wrote: > > > The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed > > from the tree, for the week ending 2020-11-08 23:59 UTC. > > > [...] > > > app-editors/emacs > 20150808-20:49 r

[gentoo-dev] Debian Tools Project packages up for grabs

2020-11-09 Thread Aaron Bauman
Hi, all. The following packages are up for grabs as the Debian Tools Project has no active members. All packages have been dropped to maintainer-needed. Enjoy. app-crypt/libmd dev-util/debhelper net-misc/apt-cacher-ng -- Cheers, Aaron signature.asc Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-python/typing

2020-11-09 Thread Michał Górny
# Michał Górny (2020-11-09) # Python 2 backport. Last revdep masked. # Removal in 30 days. Bug #753725. dev-python/typing -- Best regards, Michał Górny signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-python/cheetah

2020-11-09 Thread Michał Górny
# Michał Górny (2020-11-09) # Dead Python 2 package. Replaced by dev-python/cheetah3. The last # mongodb versions needing it are masked now. # Removal in 30 days. Bug #753722. dev-python/cheetah -- Best regards, Michał Górny signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message par

Re: [gentoo-dev] Deprecating AMD64 17.0 profiles?

2020-11-09 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
On November 9, 2020 1:54:33 PM GMT+02:00, Peter Stuge wrote: >Andreas K. Hüttel wrote: >> it's probably time to deprecate the amd64 17.0 profiles! > >I for one am not so excited about the amd64 17.1 profiles. On the >surface >it appeared to me that one developer has "taken over" just about >eve

Re: [gentoo-dev] Deprecating AMD64 17.0 profiles?

2020-11-09 Thread Aaron Bauman
On November 9, 2020 6:54:33 AM EST, Peter Stuge wrote: >Andreas K. Hüttel wrote: >> it's probably time to deprecate the amd64 17.0 profiles! > >I for one am not so excited about the amd64 17.1 profiles. On the >surface >it appeared to me that one developer has "taken over" just about >everythin

Re: [gentoo-dev] A feedback about the CI bug reporting system

2020-11-09 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
On lunedì 9 novembre 2020 13:13:19 CET Marek Szuba wrote: > I think this might be the case of a "silent majority, vocal minority" > scenario. For the record: I for one have found your tinderbox bugs very > useful, not in the least because you test unusual configurations my own > build testing does

Re: [gentoo-dev] A feedback about the CI bug reporting system

2020-11-09 Thread Marek Szuba
On 2020-11-07 12:30, Agostino Sarubbo wrote: What looks strange is that ci/tinderbox opened ~4700 bugs, sure, there are invalid/duplicate bugs but the majority are fixed so in my opinion they were useful, but looking at the mailing list feedback looks to be a completely crap. I think this migh

Re: [gentoo-dev] Deprecating AMD64 17.0 profiles?

2020-11-09 Thread Peter Stuge
Andreas K. Hüttel wrote: > it's probably time to deprecate the amd64 17.0 profiles! I for one am not so excited about the amd64 17.1 profiles. On the surface it appeared to me that one developer has "taken over" just about everything, which (regardless of the individual) can't be a good thing..

Re: [gentoo-dev] Deprecating AMD64 17.0 profiles?

2020-11-09 Thread Marek Szuba
On 2020-11-09 12:09, Jaco Kroon wrote: equery has some answers that there are still stuff installed into /usr/lib32 (which will likely clear over time, and the symlink will be unmerged).  There is this one potential pitfall down the line that I'm seeing, fairly certain this would have been cover

Re: [gentoo-dev] Deprecating AMD64 17.0 profiles?

2020-11-09 Thread Jaco Kroon
Hi Ulrich, On 2020/11/09 12:59, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >> On Mon, 09 Nov 2020, Jaco Kroon wrote: >> What is the actual "target" objective with the change?  I would have >> expected (not being one to follow this too closely): >> lib/ - arch independent stuff (eg, netifrc / dhclient etc scripts).

Re: [gentoo-dev] Deprecating AMD64 17.0 profiles?

2020-11-09 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Mon, 09 Nov 2020, Jaco Kroon wrote: > What is the actual "target" objective with the change?  I would have > expected (not being one to follow this too closely): > lib/ - arch independent stuff (eg, netifrc / dhclient etc scripts). > lib32/ - 32-bit specific stuff (libs for 32-bit). > li

Re: [gentoo-dev] Deprecating AMD64 17.0 profiles?

2020-11-09 Thread Jaco Kroon
Hi, Having just completed the migration on two systems I found some things which concerns me: 1.  A default/linux/amd64/17.0/desktop to default/linux/amd64/17.1/desktop.  This differs from the no-multilib in that there are symlinks now for the various lib32 to lib.  No such symlinks on the no-mul

Re: [gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2020-11-08 23:59 UTC

2020-11-09 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Mon, 09 Nov 2020, Robin H Johnson wrote: > The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed > from the tree, for the week ending 2020-11-08 23:59 UTC. > [...] > app-editors/emacs > 20150808-20:49 robbat2

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages & projects up for grabs due to jer's retirement

2020-11-09 Thread Jaco Kroon
Hi, On 2020/11/09 08:46, Joonas Niilola wrote: > > On 11/9/20 12:17 AM, Kent Fredric wrote: >> On Wed, 4 Nov 2020 17:34:07 +0100 >> Marek Szuba wrote: x11-terms/rxvt-unicode >>> Will co-maintain this one with conikost, don't mind being listed as >>> primary maintainer. >> If you strike an