Oskari Pirhonen writes:
> [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]]
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 03:10:51 -0500, Dale wrote:
>> Andrew Ammerlaan wrote:
>> >
>> > And then another thing, how is it possible that so many people missed
>> > the news item? They are displayed quite prominently I think, and
>> >
On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 03:10:51 -0500, Dale wrote:
> Andrew Ammerlaan wrote:
> >
> > And then another thing, how is it possible that so many people missed
> > the news item? They are displayed quite prominently I think, and
> > emerge will keep buggering you about it until it is marked as read.
>
Sam James wrote:
> Oskari Pirhonen writes:
>
>> [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]]
>> On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 03:10:51 -0500, Dale wrote:
>>> Andrew Ammerlaan wrote:
And then another thing, how is it possible that so many people missed
the news item? They are displayed quite prominently I
Alexe Stefan writes:
> Yet another example of choice being restricted by gentoo.
> However, there at least is a better reason for not keeping libressl in
> ::Gentoo, that reason being qt.
... and the swathes of other packages that are not compatible with it...
especially since openssl:3
# Andreas K. Hüttel (2021-07-06, 2023-09-15)
# No longer maintained upstream; masked everywhere for two years now.
# Please see also the 2021-07-15-opentmpfiles-deprecation news item.
#
https://www.gentoo.org/support/news-items/2021-07-15-opentmpfiles-deprecation.html
#
# The replacement is
On Fri, 2023-09-15 at 15:40 -0700, orbea wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Sep 2023 01:19:22 +0200
> Arsen Arsenović wrote:
>
> > "Eddie Chapman" writes:
> >
> > > Not aiming this at you personally but this argument has been made
> > > more than once in this thread and I personally don't think it
> > >
Canary::Stability emits very vocal warnings about "unsupported" Perl versions
even if they're fine in reality. It's not worth scaring our users over.
See https://metacpan.org/pod/Canary::Stability#ENVIRONMENT-VARIABLES.
Signed-off-by: Sam James
---
eclass/perl-module.eclass | 2 ++
1 file
See https://www.perlmonks.org/?node_id=1225311
I did consider the others, but:
* AUTOMATES_TESTING appears inappropriate for us, as it affects
exit codes and might mask failures if configuration is wrong.
* EXTENDED_TESTING is something we could consider if we had
some way to opt-in to
On 9/16/23, David Seifert wrote:
> On Fri, 2023-09-15 at 15:40 -0700, orbea wrote:
>> On Fri, 15 Sep 2023 01:19:22 +0200
>> Arsen Arsenović wrote:
>>
>> > "Eddie Chapman" writes:
>> >
>> > > Not aiming this at you personally but this argument has been made
>> > > more than once in this thread
One is written in shell, the other is written in c.(no problems here)
One is not part of systemd, the other is.
How are they identical.
I use this on my raspi server, works fine.
Gentoo really became a systemd distro, further restricting choice by the day.
10 matches
Mail list logo
