-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ferris McCormick wrote:
> You asked for patches. Both of these are incorporated in the 6.8.99
> series, and have been around long enough that they should go into
> 6.8.2-r2 if it is going mainstream:
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1259
Georgi Georgiev wrote: [Sat Jun 11 2005, 08:39:41PM EDT]
> Oh. That would still not find the case when ppc64 comes before ppc, but
> I agree it was a quick fix.
You're right (of course). Here's yet another try:
grep -hr --include=\*.ebuild '^KEYWORDS=' /usr/portage | perl -ne '
s/[^[:lower:
maillog: 11/06/2005-08:48:17(-0400): Aron Griffis types
> Georgi Georgiev wrote:[Fri Jun 10 2005, 08:04:25PM EDT]
> > maillog: 10/06/2005-13:19:30(-0400): Aron Griffis types
> > > Btw, here's an interesting statistic which really doesn't add to (or
> > > detract from, I hope) this discussio
On Sunday 12 June 2005 01:02, Wolfgang Illmeyer wrote:
> Hi,
> I've installed kde-meta 3.4.0 and I just did an emerge -p kde-meta, and
> it wants to install 252 ebuilds. If I do an emerge -up kde-meta, it
> wants to install 331 ebuilds.
> In the discussion about kde split ebuilds, it was promised t
On Sunday 12 June 2005 02:02, Wolfgang Illmeyer wrote:
> In the discussion about kde split ebuilds, it was promised that the
> split ebuilds would enable us to update only the programs that really
> changed and save us from the bulk of recompiling the same code all over.
> from 3.4.0 to 3.4.1, did
Hi,
I've installed kde-meta 3.4.0 and I just did an emerge -p kde-meta, and
it wants to install 252 ebuilds. If I do an emerge -up kde-meta, it
wants to install 331 ebuilds.
In the discussion about kde split ebuilds, it was promised that the
split ebuilds would enable us to update only the prog
On Saturday 11 June 2005 04:15 am, foser wrote:
> > if you ever had to do arch-specific KEYWORDing on a frequent basis (and
> > i'm 99% sure you have nfc we support other arches than x86 if we use
> > arch-specific breakage in GNOME depends as any sort of track record),
>
> If there was ever arch s
On Sat, 2005-06-11 at 19:53 +0100, Daniel Drake wrote:
> Stuart Longland wrote:
> > This sounds great. And yes, I'd like to participate. I have but one
> > question though...
> >
> > My question is this: Which web-blog script would you recommend for the
> > p.g.o site?
>
> I use wordpress for
Aron Griffis wrote:
> How does one get signed up to host a weblog there?
Should have included that in the original mail.
If you want to participate on the planet/universe then you need to email me
with either the URL of your existing blog or a request for gentoo to host one
for you. If you are re
Stuart Longland wrote:
> This sounds great. And yes, I'd like to participate. I have but one
> question though...
>
> My question is this: Which web-blog script would you recommend for the
> p.g.o site?
I use wordpress for my own weblog, and I like it. Not overly complicated and
does the job w
foser wrote:[Sat Jun 11 2005, 04:15:22AM EDT]
> Arch keywords are concepts and as such may not primarily be dealt as
> a an alphabetical list but as words in a sentence, there is no abc
> order in sentences.
Foser, no offense intended, but you started out in this thread making
a couple good po
On 6/11/05, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday 11 June 2005 17:21, Joshua Baergen wrote:
> > I don't
> > care what order they're in. It's not like there are 100 keywords or
> > something,
> Wait until ppc-od, x86-fbsd and amd64-fbsd keywords make their way into the
>
Georgi Georgiev wrote: [Fri Jun 10 2005, 08:04:25PM EDT]
> maillog: 10/06/2005-13:19:30(-0400): Aron Griffis types
> > Btw, here's an interesting statistic which really doesn't add to (or
> > detract from, I hope) this discussion...
> >
> > grep -hr --include=\*.ebuild '^KEYWORDS=' /usr/portage |
On Saturday 11 June 2005 17:21, Joshua Baergen wrote:
> I don't
> care what order they're in. It's not like there are 100 keywords or
> something,
Wait until ppc-od, x86-fbsd and amd64-fbsd keywords make their way into the
tree... the problem there is worst, and the alphabetical order is really
On 6/11/05, foser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-06-11 at 17:28 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
> > By lack of policy?
>
> Well I'm sort of concerned by the fact that I have to state the obvious,
> but really by people reordering them for no reason.
>
> It's not the lack of policy that is t
I think the actual idea of what Gentoo does is much larger than people tend to
realize it. When Linux first came out, it was a hacker's choice and has now
expanded into something much greater than Linus himself I think had ever
anticipated.
Now, when this whole idea of "distributions" came to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stuart Longland wrote:
> My question is this: Which web-blog script would you recommend for the
> p.g.o site?
>
Dunno that one works better than the other wrt the planet. I'd say you want
one that at least has support for categories or else you'll
Daniel Drake wrote:
> New contributors will be added to both sites. All existing contributors feeds
> have been copied over. If you are an existing contributor and you'd like to
> truly become part of the universe by having your feed 'de-restricted' on the
> universe site, please send me an email
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sorry for changing the thread topic; I don't have the original on this
system. This time I am addressing 6.8.2-r2 as you asked, not .99.x as I
wanted you to have asked. :)
You asked for patches. Both of these are incorporated in the 6.8.99
seri
On Sat, Jun 11, 2005 at 10:15:22AM +0200, foser wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-06-10 at 12:33 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > you'd
> > know that scattered KEYWORDS is a pita to deal with ... i've seen cases
> > where
> > a specific arch was duplicated in KEYWORDS; once near the beginning and
> > once
On Sat, 2005-06-11 at 17:28 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
> By lack of policy?
Well I'm sort of concerned by the fact that I have to state the obvious,
but really by people reordering them for no reason.
It's not the lack of policy that is the problem here, it's the use of
some self defined not unif
On Saturday 11 June 2005 17:15, foser wrote:
> Anyway, my feud is with the inconsistency within packages and how it got
> introduced, not with whatever order is preferred by some. Now tell me
> how this happened again?
By lack of policy?
Regards,
Jason Stubbs
pgp16vjho2Xm4.pgp
Description: PGP
On Fri, 2005-06-10 at 12:33 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> consistency is one advantage (which i'm sure you'll say is pointless)
I've been the one talking consistency, something you've knowingly broken
for a long time here.
> as for the rest of the ramble you posted here it's really quite wrong .
Sven Vermeulen posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted
below, on Fri, 10 Jun 2005 14:28:49 +0200:
> In the mail [Daniel Robbins] states that we can republish his articles
> on Gentoo as long as we put the following note in each document:
>
> """
> The original version of this article was first pub
24 matches
Mail list logo
