Hi,
This is an automatically created email message.
http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 11406 ebuilds.
The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds.
The tests are:
* if a version has been masked for 30 days or more.
* if an arch was in KE
a heads up that i'd like to start deprecating (well, removing) USE=diet
support from the tree
this does not mean we're removing dietlibc or anything like that, it simply
means that if you want to compile something against dietlibc, then that's
your own business ... mixing compiler selection and
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 12:34:41PM +1200, Nick Rout wrote:
> Thanks to all of you, thats now very clear.
>
> The message i have is that it will work, but its not allowed.
Wrong interpretation- it won't work within an ebuild.
It requires exteneral user intervention to make the ebuild work,
*every*
Thanks to all of you, thats now very clear.
The message i have is that it will work, but its not allowed.
Apprently the package in question is also housed at sourceforge, but at
the moment SF doesn't have the latestt version. I imagine that when it
does the usual SF mirror thing will work.
On T
On Aug 23, 2005, at 8:11 PM, Nick Rout wrote:
On Tue, 23 Aug 2005 04:41:49 +0200
Marius Mauch wrote:
DOWNLOAD_CMD="wget http://laby.toybox.de/download15/ -O
laby_$(P).tar.gz"
Nope. You have three options:
a) bug upstream to fix that crap
b) use RESTRICT="fetch"
c) assuming the license per
> See, certain terminal emulators lie about their TERM setting. Usually
> it's things that aren't xterm pretending to be an xterm, although rxvt
> sometimes crops up too. Examples of things pretending to be xterm
> include Konsole, Gnome Terminal.
>
> The logic behind it goes like this:
>
> * We
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 12:11:19PM +1200, Nick Rout wrote:
>
> On Tue, 23 Aug 2005 04:41:49 +0200
> Marius Mauch wrote:
>
> > > DOWNLOAD_CMD="wget http://laby.toybox.de/download15/ -O
> > > laby_$(P).tar.gz"
> >
> > Nope. You have three options:
> > a) bug upstream to fix that crap
> > b) use RE
On Tuesday 23 August 2005 08:11 pm, Nick Rout wrote:
> So am I being told that you can't change stuff from make.conf per ebuild?
> That would fix it I think.
>
> FETCHCOMMAND="${FETCHCOMMAND} -O laby.${PV}"
correct, that is not acceptable
-mike
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Tue, 23 Aug 2005 04:41:49 +0200
Marius Mauch wrote:
> > DOWNLOAD_CMD="wget http://laby.toybox.de/download15/ -O
> > laby_$(P).tar.gz"
>
> Nope. You have three options:
> a) bug upstream to fix that crap
> b) use RESTRICT="fetch"
> c) assuming the license permits it, repackage it
>
> Marius
> The termcap method is provided by libtermcap-compat. Most applications
> which use this method only do so as an option for systems where terminfo
> is not available -- for example, for Vim, terminfo vs termcap is a
> compile-time option. The termcap database is limited, generally out of
> date an
maillog: 23/08/2005-16:57:28(-0400): Olivier Crete types
> I though about this thing last night, and frankly, I think its a lost
> cause. I remember that during the Gnome 1.x era, gnome-terminal used to
> set TERM=gnome (at least it did on Red Hat) and they had the proper
> termcap/terminfo entries
On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 12:27 -0500, Brian Harring wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 12:25:03PM -0400, Kristian Benoit wrote:
> > On Mon, 2005-08-22 at 15:39 -0500, Brian Harring wrote:
> > > That and help would always be welcome :P
> >
> > Then where do I find the code (I'm an official dev yet, so I
On Tue, 23 Aug 2005 16:57:28 -0400 Olivier Crete <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| As a gnome-terminal user, I've never had problems with anything that
| tried to use advanced xterm crap... probably because no uses them. If
| you want X stuff, just use a real X application (like gvim...). I'm
| strictly
On Tue, 2005-23-08 at 21:27 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Aug 2005 8:52:13 +0200 "Kevin F. Quinn"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | On 21/8/2005 23:05:05, Ciaran McCreesh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> | > Now the proposal. This isn't something that can happen immediately,
> | > but it's
On Tue, 23 Aug 2005 8:52:13 +0200 "Kevin F. Quinn"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| On 21/8/2005 23:05:05, Ciaran McCreesh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
| > Now the proposal. This isn't something that can happen immediately,
| > but it's something I'd like to see us working towards:
| >
| > [...]
| >
|
Hi,
This is an automatically created email message.
http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 11404 ebuilds.
The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds.
The tests are:
* if a version has been masked for 30 days or more.
* if an arch was in KE
On Mon, 2005-08-22 at 20:38 -0600, Jason Wever wrote:
> Is there a reason you folks are using a non-gentoo bug system to work on
> this? It seems a bit redundant and un-needed in my layman's
> perspective.
>
> Cheers,
Gentoo's bugzilla doesn't seem to be the place to log bugs about
packages that
On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 01:58:46PM -0400, Olivier Crete wrote:
> I havent looked at your new implementation (does it exist).. but yea
> what you wrote seems to make sense... except that I keep the source code
> too.. so it would bloat binary packages.. I think it should be done
> before the package
On Tue, 2005-23-08 at 12:40 -0500, Brian Harring wrote:
> First, sidenote (mild ot to this thread also), pardon the dupe posts,
> thick fingered typing dumping an old message :)
>
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 01:34:33PM -0400, Olivier Crete wrote:
> > On Tue, 2005-23-08 at 11:16 +0200, Paul de Vriez
First, sidenote (mild ot to this thread also), pardon the dupe posts,
thick fingered typing dumping an old message :)
On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 01:34:33PM -0400, Olivier Crete wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-23-08 at 11:16 +0200, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> > As an aside to this. Does anyone know how debug infor
On Tue, 2005-23-08 at 11:16 +0200, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> As an aside to this. Does anyone know how debug information can be changed
> to have a different basedir. My idea was to create a "custom" strip
> wrapper that would create external debugging files (like now possible
> with gdb/binutils)
Lot of text left inline, pardon, just scroll and deal with it :P
On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 12:28:08PM -0400, Kristian Benoit wrote:
> Here is my recent communication with Pieter:
>
> On Sat, 2005-08-13 at 21:59 +0200, Pieter Van den Abeele wrote:
> > On 13 Aug 2005, at 19:16, Kristian Benoit wrote
On 08/23/05 Ricardo Loureiro wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Aug 2005 21:41:35 +0100
> Stephen Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > portage-ng is dead. There is a rewrite going on, but it'll take a
> > while
> > to get anywhere near usable.
>
> I searched a bit to find information about portage-ng but
On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 12:25:03PM -0400, Kristian Benoit wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-08-22 at 15:39 -0500, Brian Harring wrote:
> > That and help would always be welcome :P
>
> Then where do I find the code (I'm an official dev yet, so I only have
> access to what's in the mirrors and the patchs on mai
On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 12:25:03PM -0400, Kristian Benoit wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-08-22 at 15:39 -0500, Brian Harring wrote:
> > That and help would always be welcome :P
>
> Then where do I find the code (I'm an official dev yet, so I only have
> access to what's in the mirrors and the patchs on mai
On Mon, 22 Aug 2005 15:39:10 -0500
Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The 2.1 code that was pushed out for inspection addresses the cache
> issue mostly, and modularization as much as possible. Everything
> else
> falls to the rewrite which is underway- I'd suggest contacting
> portage
On Mon, 22 Aug 2005 21:41:35 +0100
Stephen Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> portage-ng is dead. There is a rewrite going on, but it'll take a
> while
> to get anywhere near usable.
I searched a bit to find information about portage-ng but the only
doc I found was Daniel's pdf with just a draw
On Mon, 2005-08-22 at 21:41 +0100, Stephen Bennett wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Aug 2005 13:49:14 -0400
> Kristian Benoit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I do agree with that, portage probably need a rewrite/better
> > modularization anyway. There is/was a project called portage-ng () you
> > might want t
On Mon, 2005-08-22 at 15:39 -0500, Brian Harring wrote:
> That and help would always be welcome :P
Then where do I find the code (I'm an official dev yet, so I only have
access to what's in the mirrors and the patchs on mailing lists)
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 03:20:16PM +0200, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> To allow for this to work with current portage versions, perhaps it would
> be an option to introduce a new extension for .ebuild scripts that use
> it's functionality. That would allow all non-EAPI aware portage versions
> to aut
On Tuesday 23 August 2005 22:41, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> On Thursday 14 July 2005 14:37, Jason Stubbs wrote:
> > On Thursday 14 July 2005 20:58, Ned Ludd wrote:
> > > echo "being that no portage dev in his/her right mind would
> > > ever" echo "allow interactive code in an ebuild we use bashr
Hi,
i just wrote an init.d-script and i thought that the LANG variable was
inherited since it set system-wide in /etc/env.d/02locale and therefor
is also found in /etc/profile.env
Now i noticed, that LANG isn't set for the process started by my
init.d-script.
So what's the intension to ignore /e
On Tuesday 19 July 2005 20:00, Roy Marples wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-07-19 at 12:42 -0400, Eric Brown wrote:
> > The real problem is not that the daemons don't return errors, but
> > that our init scripts do not make reasonable attempts to verify
> > service startup. If a Gentoo init script claims tha
On Thursday 14 July 2005 14:37, Jason Stubbs wrote:
> On Thursday 14 July 2005 20:58, Ned Ludd wrote:
> > echo "being that no portage dev in his/her right mind would
> > ever" echo "allow interactive code in an ebuild we use bashrc tricks"
>
> Actually, I promote interactive code in pkg_confi
On Thursday 07 July 2005 22:42, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 10:52:06AM -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> > > strlen(EBUILD_FORMAT) * 19546 = 249K
> > > strlen(EAPI) * 19546 = 77K
> > > strlen(EV) * 19546 = 39K
> > >
> > > Where 19546 is the number if ebuilds in the tree as.
> >
On Thursday 07 July 2005 03:14, Aron Griffis wrote:
> Roy Marples wrote:[Wed Jul 06 2005, 08:51:17PM EDT]
>
> > ebuilds could be changed over time - unless I'm missing something
> > basic here ..
>
> Yes, you're missing the default functions. Presently src_compile does
> (effectively) "econf &
Am Dienstag, 23. August 2005 13:49 schrieb ext Dulmandakh Sukhbaatar:
> Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> >Try df -i, maybe you're out of inodes.
>
> tnx, its out of inodes. How I can solve this problem?
1) backup the data and recreate the filesystem (maybe switch to reiserfs)
2) Create a new filesystem, c
On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 20:49 +0900, Dulmandakh Sukhbaatar wrote:
> tnx, its out of inodes. How I can solve this problem?
It's ext(2/3) right ?
You can delete some files, reformat the filesystem using mkfs.ext(2/3)
-i , or switch to a filesystem which creates inodes
on the fly ( like reiserfs ).
I
On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 08:49:11PM +0900, Dulmandakh Sukhbaatar wrote:
> tnx, its out of inodes. How I can solve this problem?
Reformat the partition with a different number of inodes (see the manual
page for mkfs.$your_filesystem) or switch to a filesystem that does not use
a limited number of in
Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
Am Dienstag, 23. August 2005 13:23 schrieb ext Dulmandakh Sukhbaatar:
emerge --metadata show such error messages:
Failed cache update: app-admin/zprod-manager-0.1 [Errno 28] No space
left on device: '/var/cache/edb/dep//usr/portage/app-admin/
but df shows me
/dev/hda
Am Dienstag, 23. August 2005 13:23 schrieb ext Dulmandakh Sukhbaatar:
> emerge --metadata show such error messages:
> Failed cache update: app-admin/zprod-manager-0.1 [Errno 28] No space
> left on device: '/var/cache/edb/dep//usr/portage/app-admin/
>
> but df shows me
>
> /dev/hda8 9
Am Dienstag, 23. August 2005 12:36 schrieb ext Jason Stubbs:
> On Tuesday 23 August 2005 15:23, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> >
> > However, even after reading all the ebuild docs, I can't figure out how
> > to tell portage that version 2.1.8 is newer than 20030601. The only way
> > I could convince port
Simon Stelling wrote:
Hi,
Next time please open a new thread instead of hijacking an unrelated one.
Dulmandakh Sukhbaatar wrote:
I know it's not developers problem, but some times ago I by mistake
removed some directories in /var/cache. No I can't install any
portage and update it via emerg
Hi,
Next time please open a new thread instead of hijacking an unrelated one.
Dulmandakh Sukhbaatar wrote:
I know it's not developers problem, but some times ago I by mistake
removed some directories in /var/cache. No I can't install any portage
and update it via emerge-webrsync (firewalled).
I know it's not developers problem, but some times ago I by mistake
removed some directories in /var/cache. No I can't install any portage
and update it via emerge-webrsync (firewalled). What should I do?
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Tuesday 23 August 2005 15:23, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have written an ebuild for pam_krb5, based on the version found in
> fedora, since the one from sourceforge which is currently in portage is
> way outdated.
>
> However, even after reading all the ebuild docs, I can't figure out how
On Tuesday 23 August 2005 00:38, Brian Harring wrote:
> Hola all.
>
> Short version, the nostrip feature is a bit funky as an option. What
> I'm after is effectively building all packages *with* debugging
> information as default, and leaving it up to the repository you're
> merging the package to
Quoting Ed W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi,
(I previously sent this message directly to Stuart and got no reply - is
there a better mailing list to discuss this stuff?)
I am writing an ebuild for sql-ledger an accounting package for small
businesses. I am hitting a problem with symlinks not being c
Hi,
(I previously sent this message directly to Stuart and got no reply - is
there a better mailing list to discuss this stuff?)
I am writing an ebuild for sql-ledger an accounting package for small
businesses. I am hitting a problem with symlinks not being copied
across to the virtual director
On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 09:21:50AM +0200, Fabian Zeindl wrote:
> Since nobody except Diego replied on my mail a week ago:
> Is there another way besides filing bugs and mailing the list to make a
> proposal which gets investigated? I think many users are concerned about that
> gstreamer "oddness",
Since nobody except Diego replied on my mail a week ago:
Is there another way besides filing bugs and mailing the list to make a
proposal which gets investigated? I think many users are concerned about that
gstreamer "oddness", and I didn't find one good reason while reading through
bugzilla of no
51 matches
Mail list logo
