Hi,
yesterday I've noticed, that some mappings in /dev/discs are missing on
my machine.
Actually I have an additional ATA controller with some discs attached.
So I have /dev/hda through /dev/hdl which are ok. But the mappings to
/dev/discs/discX with X > 7 are missing.
Whose fault would that be i
On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 20:30 +0100, Kevin F. Quinn (Gentoo) wrote:
> Personally I think unless there is a real problem that needs to be
> resolved, moving packages around should be avoided.
It's a shame we can't find a way to turn package categories into solely
a presentational feature, rather th
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 05:46:01PM -0300, Marcelo Góes wrote:
> I agree. Adding a package to a herd is basically the same as adding
> someone as a package maintainer. If one doesn't belong to the target
> herd, he/she should drop a line asking first.
Some developers tend to think that if they just
On 2/20/06, Michael Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 'given' to us) but if you're (NOT ciaranm, general reply) going to add a
> package and then proceed to assign it to a herd, it would be really keen
> if you told the herd, or at least took care of the bugs you generated as
> a result. Maybe
On Fri, 2006-02-17 at 02:36 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> dev-perl/XML-AutoWriter-0.38: description:
> major: DESCRIPTION equal to $PN? You can do better than that.
slightly off topic (fixed btw - perl herd didn't add it, but it was
'given' to us) but if you're (NOT ciaranm, general reply) g
On Monday 20 February 2006 19:51, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> Positive as in "yes, we'll fix it", or positive as in "yes, we're
> mangling the tarballs and we hate you"?
Positive as in already fixed.
Carsten
pgpBBuf9e1rQs.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, 20 Feb 2006 14:13:46 +0100
Bjarke Istrup Pedersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was thinking, how about putting all log related packages into their
> own category?
Personally I think unless there is a real problem that needs to be
resolved, moving packages around should be avoided. We'v
On Mon, 20 Feb 2006 17:36:35 +0100 Carsten Lohrke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| Got a positive answer. Any remaining issues?
Positive as in "yes, we'll fix it", or positive as in "yes, we're
mangling the tarballs and we hate you"?
--
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Wearer of the shiny hat)
Ma
Got a positive answer. Any remaining issues?
Carsten
pgpNZUjiYYIkb.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 14:13 +0100, Bjarke Istrup Pedersen wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hey.
>
> I was thinking, how about putting all log related packages into their
> own category?
> This should be logging daemons, log viewers, logrotate etc.
>
> Maybe creating a
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 02:13:46PM +0100, Bjarke Istrup Pedersen <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was thinking, how about putting all log related packages into their
> own category?
> This should be logging daemons, log viewers, logrotate etc.
>
> Maybe creating a logging herd would be an idea to,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hey.
I was thinking, how about putting all log related packages into their
own category?
This should be logging daemons, log viewers, logrotate etc.
Maybe creating a logging herd would be an idea to, to remove the load
from the base-system herd.
Wha
12 matches
Mail list logo
