On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 08:40 +, Mike Frysinger wrote:
If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even
vote on, let us know ! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole
Gentoo dev list to see.
I have one item that I would like to see addressed in the next possible
council
Mike Frysinger wrote:
If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even
vote on, let us know ! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole
Gentoo dev list to see.
I have a problem with our current SPF record. I wanna see a +all in this
record for 2 reasons:
a) SPF is really
On Sunday 05 November 2006 04:35, Peter Gordon wrote:
I have one item that I would like to see addressed in the next possible
council meeting: The reply behavior of gentoo-core messages. What's
happening is that gentoo-core appears to have no default Reply-To header
set.
i dont see anyone
On Sun, 05 Nov 2006 01:35:43 -0800 Peter Gordon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 08:40 +, Mike Frysinger wrote:
| If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even
| vote on, let us know ! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole
| Gentoo dev list to see.
|
On Sunday 05 November 2006 10:59, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sun, 05 Nov 2006 01:35:43 -0800 Peter Gordon
Clearly this is one of those easy to understand issues where everyone
has an opinion, and rather than fix their mail client or behaviour they
try to have a huge debate about it... Don't
Alin Nastac napsal(a):
Mike Frysinger wrote:
If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even
vote on, let us know ! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole
Gentoo dev list to see.
I have a problem with our current SPF record. I wanna see a +all in this
record for 2
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
Wow. That's about the pettiest and least relevant thing you could ask
them to discuss. Why not ask for a vote on what colour the soft
icecream machine should be whilst you're at it?
Silly analogy.
Clearly this is one of those easy to understand issues where everyone
On Sunday 05 November 2006 04:50, Alin Nastac wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even
vote on, let us know ! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole
Gentoo dev list to see.
I have a problem with our current SPF record. I wanna see
Mike Frysinger wrote:
that's nice, but again, why arent these being directed to infra ?
It could be considered as organization policy, so I assumed council had
to be involved in this decision.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Sunday 05 November 2006 05:39, Alin Nastac wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
that's nice, but again, why arent these being directed to infra ?
It could be considered as organization policy, so I assumed council had
to be involved in this decision.
it isnt ... so file a bug for infra
-mike
On Sun, 05 Nov 2006 02:23:02 -0800
David Shakaryan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
Wow. That's about the pettiest and least relevant thing you could ask
them to discuss. Why not ask for a vote on what colour the soft
icecream machine should be whilst you're at it?
Silly
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Sunday 05 November 2006 05:39, Alin Nastac wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
that's nice, but again, why arent these being directed to infra ?
It could be considered as organization policy, so I assumed council had
to be involved in this decision.
Alin Nastac napsal(a):
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Sunday 05 November 2006 05:39, Alin Nastac wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
that's nice, but again, why arent these being directed to infra ?
It could be considered as organization policy, so I assumed council had
to be involved
On Sunday 05 November 2006 07:36, Jakub Moc wrote:
I'd like to resubmit it to the council... :/
not until it pans out with infra
-mike
pgpwXZzS8iG6Y.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Sunday 05 November 2006 07:36, Jakub Moc wrote:
I'd like to resubmit it to the council... :/
not until it pans out with infra
Now would be a good time to bring the problem before the council?
It has been permanently closed as WONTFIX by klieber (our SMTP
Hello.
Short question: What shall we use to link libraries/programs: gcc or ld?
Why?
A bit longer story: I have a problem during linking of wepattack on
amd64 systems. Linking stage issues warning:
$ x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-ld -o wepattack wepattack.o rc4.o wepfilter.o
log.o modes.o misc.o
Mike Frysinger wrote:
i use/maintain metalog myself and thus could care less about sysklogd ...
anyone out there care enough to fixup bugs for it ?
-mike
Oh noes! my beloved logger!
I'll try and take a look at it.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On 2006.11.03 19:15, Jon Portnoy wrote:
I've been mostly inactive for a good while but hanging on mostly for
sentimentality's sake, it's past time for that to stop.
[snip]
Later. It's been fun, it's been real, but it hasn't been real fun. :)
I'll be around #gentoo/#-dev.
--
Jon Portnoy
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 06:47:07PM +0300, Peter Volkov (pva) wrote:
Hello.
Short question: What shall we use to link libraries/programs: gcc or ld?
Why?
A bit longer story: I have a problem during linking of wepattack on
amd64 systems. Linking stage issues warning:
$
On Sun, 2006-11-05 at 04:57 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
i dont see anyone talking to infra about it so why dont you start there
-mike
Will do. Thanks, Mike.
--
Peter Gordon (codergeek42)
Gentoo Forums Global Moderator
GnuPG Public Key ID: 0xFFC19479 / Fingerprint:
DD68 A414 56BD 6368 D957
Two patches which allow a user to bypass files created with doman and
dodoc in FEATURES:
FEATURES=noman nodoc emerge -av foo
http://jawed.name/dev/gentoo/nodoc.patch
http://jawed.name/dev/gentoo/noman.patch
Quick background/inspiration:
I found myself having to make an initrd suitable to do
On Sunday, 05. November. 2006 19:02, John Jawed wrote:
Two patches which allow a user to bypass files created with doman and
dodoc in FEATURES:
FEATURES=noman nodoc emerge -av foo
http://jawed.name/dev/gentoo/nodoc.patch
http://jawed.name/dev/gentoo/noman.patch
Err, isn't current portage
Am Sonntag, den 05.11.2006, 20:08 +0100 schrieb Christian Heim:
On Sunday, 05. November. 2006 19:02, John Jawed wrote:
Two patches which allow a user to bypass files created with doman and
dodoc in FEATURES:
FEATURES=noman nodoc emerge -av foo
http://jawed.name/dev/gentoo/nodoc.patch
Mike Frysinger wrote:
upstream says it's dead and they dont want people using it ... considering
the
problems we've seen that sounds just peachy
p.masked now
-mike
oh thank god.
--
by design, by neglect
[EMAIL PROTECTED]for a fact or
Ah yep, missed it. Nevermind my chatter :-)
On 11/5/06, Tobias Scherbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Sonntag, den 05.11.2006, 20:08 +0100 schrieb Christian Heim:
On Sunday, 05. November. 2006 19:02, John Jawed wrote:
Two patches which allow a user to bypass files created with doman and
Look into INSTALL_MASK.
--Brian Jackson
On Nov 5, 2006, at 12:02 PM, John Jawed wrote:
Two patches which allow a user to bypass files created with doman and
dodoc in FEATURES:
FEATURES=noman nodoc emerge -av foo
http://jawed.name/dev/gentoo/nodoc.patch
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sun, 05 Nov 2006 01:35:43 -0800 Peter Gordon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 08:40 +, Mike Frysinger wrote:
| If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even
| vote on, let us know ! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole
|
Tach Christian, 0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID)
Christian Heim schrieb:
Its my pleasure to introduce to you Hans de Graaff (also known as
graaff), our latest addition helping with emacs/xemacs.
Hmm, I think he just wants XEmacs, you know it is like Gnome/KDE. :)
Ryan Tandy wrote:
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sun, 05 Nov 2006 01:35:43 -0800 Peter Gordon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 08:40 +, Mike Frysinger wrote:
| If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even
| vote on, let us know ! Simply reply to this
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 19:21:46 +0100 Piotr Jaroszyński [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| And it doesn't work.
|
| Wanna bet? Of course you must put it in the x-modular.eclass, but I
| thought that's quite obvious as spyderous was talking about adding
| IUSE= to that eclass.
On Sun, 2006-11-05 at 02:26 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
upstream says it's dead and they dont want people using it ... considering
the
problems we've seen that sounds just peachy
fine ... however, someone should adapt media-video/mjpegtools-1.8.0-r1
(see bug 154199)
thanks,
matthias
--
John Jawed wrote:
At larger sizes the loading the initrd would actually cause a kernel
panic on pivoting root...whether this was a result of a kernel config,
a set maximum size limit, or something else I'm not exactly sure of.
Yes, there's a hardcoded limit in the kernel config that you can
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Sunday 05 November 2006 10:00, Alin Nastac wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Sunday 05 November 2006 07:36, Jakub Moc wrote:
I'd like to resubmit it to the council... :/
not until it pans out with infra
Now would be a good time to
On Sunday 05 November 2006 22:42, Matthias Langer wrote:
however, someone should adapt media-video/mjpegtools-1.8.0-r1
(see bug 154199)
and someone should search for duplicates before filing bugs
-mike
pgpNoUcD7VsLM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
34 matches
Mail list logo
