[gentoo-dev] masking packages

2007-04-02 Thread Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.-
gentoo-x86/profiles$ cvs diff package.mask Index: package.mask === RCS file: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/profiles/package.mask,v retrieving revision 1.7081 diff -u -b -B -r1.7081 package.mask --- package.mask2 Apr 2007 18:45:03 -

Re: [gentoo-dev] /{"", usr/}bin path changed. What is the right solution for scripts?

2007-04-02 Thread Peter Volkov
On Sun, 2007-04-01 at 16:21 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > env not being in /usr/bin will break an awful lot of stuff. It's listed > in many textbooks as being the safe way of doing things. On Sun, 2007-04-01 at 08:46 -0700, Alec Warner wrote: > However using env really only makes sense in the >

[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: [soc] Python bindings for Paludis

2007-04-02 Thread Steve Long
Seemant Kulleen wrote: >> > That's uncalled for. There's no need to get nasty. >> >> I applaud your intent, but feel it would have far more effect on the >> atmosphere if applied to a few of your devs, rather than users who employ >> milder terms? >> >> It just seems knowingly unfair, and I don'

[gentoo-dev] Re: [soc] Python bindings for Paludis

2007-04-02 Thread Duncan
Mike Auty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sun, 01 Apr 2007 23:43:37 +0100: Snipped a lot of well stated opinion... > So now the question is, are we willing to accept the cons for the pros, > or do we need to find a different solution. If not, then other package