[gentoo-dev] net-dns/bind{,-tools} needs an active maintainer

2007-06-17 Thread Konstantin V. Arkhipov
i'm too busy with real life atm, is there anyone willing to help with bind's maintaining? -- voxus :wq signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [gentoo-dev] net-dns/bind{,-tools} needs an active maintainer

2007-06-17 Thread Tobias Scherbaum
Konstantin V. Arkhipov wrote: i'm too busy with real life atm, is there anyone willing to help with bind's maintaining? What's the current state of both packages? i.e. lots of open bugs? How much attention do these packages need? wkr, Tobias signature.asc Description: Dies ist ein

Re: [gentoo-dev] net-dns/bind{,-tools} needs an active maintainer

2007-06-17 Thread Konstantin V. Arkhipov
On Sunday 17 June 2007 17:02:31 Tobias Scherbaum wrote: Konstantin V. Arkhipov wrote: i'm too busy with real life atm, is there anyone willing to help with bind's maintaining? What's the current state of both packages? i.e. lots of open bugs? How much attention do these packages need?

Re: [gentoo-dev] net-dns/bind{,-tools} needs an active maintainer

2007-06-17 Thread Jakub Moc
Tobias Scherbaum napsal(a): Konstantin V. Arkhipov wrote: i'm too busy with real life atm, is there anyone willing to help with bind's maintaining? What's the current state of both packages? i.e. lots of open bugs? Not really... 8 bugs altogether, 2 enhancements, 2 stabilization, 1

Re: [gentoo-dev] QA issue: No stable skype in Tree

2007-06-17 Thread _JusSx_
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 05:36:22PM +0100, Gustavo Felisberto wrote: A little background info: Right now there are three versions of net-im/skype in the tree: 1 - the 1.2 series (with a stable version) 2- the 1.3 series also with a stable version 3- the 1.4 series with a ~/hardmask version

Re: [gentoo-dev] net-dns/bind{,-tools} needs an active maintainer

2007-06-17 Thread Tobias Scherbaum
Jakub Moc wrote: Tobias Scherbaum napsal(a): Konstantin V. Arkhipov wrote: i'm too busy with real life atm, is there anyone willing to help with bind's maintaining? What's the current state of both packages? i.e. lots of open bugs? Not really... 8 bugs altogether, 2

Re: [gentoo-dev] net-dns/bind{,-tools} needs an active maintainer

2007-06-17 Thread Konstantin V. Arkhipov
On Sunday 17 June 2007 19:12:51 Tobias Scherbaum wrote: Jakub Moc wrote: Tobias Scherbaum napsal(a): Konstantin V. Arkhipov wrote: i'm too busy with real life atm, is there anyone willing to help with bind's maintaining? What's the current state of both packages? i.e. lots of

Re: [gentoo-dev] net-dns/bind{,-tools} needs an active maintainer

2007-06-17 Thread Christian Heim
On Sunday 17 June 2007 14:43:59 Konstantin V. Arkhipov wrote: i'm too busy with real life atm, is there anyone willing to help with bind's maintaining? What happened to mjolnir (as in Martin Jackson) ? Didn't he also join the bind herd, to help you fix stuff ? Regards, Christian --

Re: [gentoo-dev] net-dns/bind{,-tools} needs an active maintainer

2007-06-17 Thread Martin Jackson
Christian Heim wrote: On Sunday 17 June 2007 14:43:59 Konstantin V. Arkhipov wrote: i'm too busy with real life atm, is there anyone willing to help with bind's maintaining? What happened to mjolnir (as in Martin Jackson) ? Didn't he also join the bind herd, to help you fix stuff ?

[gentoo-dev] multiple compile-install phases

2007-06-17 Thread Marijn Schouten (hkBst)
Hi list, I've encountered a few cases where the build process requires building and installing something and then using that to build something else. Is there a standard way to do this? Marijn -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] multiple compile-install phases

2007-06-17 Thread George Shapovalov
Sunday, 17. June 2007, Marijn Schouten (hkBst) Ви написали: I've encountered a few cases where the build process requires building and installing something and then using that to build something else. Is there a standard way to do this? I'd say - split the package in two (or how many pieces

Re: [gentoo-dev] multiple compile-install phases

2007-06-17 Thread Drake Wyrm
Marijn Schouten (hkBst) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've encountered a few cases where the build process requires building and installing something and then using that to build something else. Is there a standard way to do this? Perhaps you could build the build tools and install them to some

Re: [gentoo-dev] QA issue: No stable skype in Tree

2007-06-17 Thread Josh Saddler
_JusSx_ wrote: On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 05:36:22PM +0100, Gustavo Felisberto wrote: A little background info: Right now there are three versions of net-im/skype in the tree: 1 - the 1.2 series (with a stable version) 2- the 1.3 series also with a stable version 3- the 1.4 series with a

Re: [gentoo-dev] QA issue: No stable skype in Tree

2007-06-17 Thread Stephen Bennett
On Sun, 17 Jun 2007 16:06:32 +0200 _JusSx_ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Let's remove it from portage. why should we use it? I run it for a bit I can say it's awful... it is closed-source, is not it? so I think it's better not to install it... Not everyone sees that as a reason not to use a

[gentoo-dev] Re: QA issue: No stable skype in Tree

2007-06-17 Thread Steve Long
Richard Freeman wrote: Agreed, although I think most people would agree with the principle being alluded to. I don't think many people had issues with making users fetch their java files, as they generally had stable URLs and were hosted for a long time. The real issue is with software where

[gentoo-dev] Re: QA issue: No stable skype in Tree

2007-06-17 Thread Steve Long
Josh Saddler wrote: As we've established earlier, being closed-source is not sufficient reason for removing any program from Portage; you should have read the rest of the thread. No but fascist license conditions are; you should have read the ion3 discussion. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing

Re: [gentoo-dev] multiple compile-install phases

2007-06-17 Thread Luis Francisco Araujo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 George Shapovalov wrote: Sunday, 17. June 2007, Marijn Schouten (hkBst) Ви написали: I've encountered a few cases where the build process requires building and installing something and then using that to build something else. Is there a standard

[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2007-06-17 23h59 UTC

2007-06-17 Thread Robin H. Johnson
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed from the tree, for the week ending 2007-06-17 23h59 UTC. Removals: x11-wm/ion3 2007-06-11 21:52:31 mabi www-misc/libapreq 2007-06-13 12:24:30 chtekk dev-perl/AxKit

Re: [gentoo-dev] merging man page documentation into eclasses

2007-06-17 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Monday 11 June 2007, Mike Frysinger wrote: keeping documentation of functions in a separate file (man pages in this case) has obvious bit rot problems written all over it, so i'd like to merge the documentation into the respective eclasses so that the man pages can be automatically

[gentoo-dev] Re: QA issue: No stable skype in Tree

2007-06-17 Thread Steve Long
Stephen Bennett wrote: Not everyone sees that as a reason not to use a potentially useful piece of software. We're not debian. Could you clarify whether this is indeed a Gentoo QA issue, or in fact a licensing issue? If the latter case, this discussion should prob'y go to the new -project ml if

[gentoo-dev] Re: EAPI-1 (or 1, perhaps) Proposal: AND Dependencies

2007-06-17 Thread Steve Long
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: Luca Barbato [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ciaran McCreesh wrote: Paludis allows users to do some-cat/foo[=4.04-3] and some-cat/foo[=4.1|=4.2|=4.3] . The syntax isn't particularly pretty, but it's cleaner than requiring duplication of the cat/pkg. Combined with :slot