> On Wed, 4 Jul 2007, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> 1) Again, it's not a license. It's a copyright notice with a couple
> of jokes attached. It contains no statement granting anyone anything
> with regard to the copyright of the materials it is attached to. Ask
> your lawyer.
Is it even a copyright
On Friday 06 July 2007, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> get your "waaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing:
> glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
> gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
> in the next day or so
sorry, forgot about ~ia64 as well
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed mess
Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 06 July 2007, Jim Ramsay wrote:
>
> > Are there any crazy upgrade paths like the good old libstdc++ bump?
>
> no
And there was great rejoicing.
--
Jim Ramsay
Gentoo/Linux Developer (rox,gkrellm)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Friday 06 July 2007, Jim Ramsay wrote:
> Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > get your "waaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing:
> > glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
> > gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
>
> Are there any crazy upgrade paths like the good old libstdc++ bump?
no
-mi
Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> get your "waaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing:
> glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
> gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
Are there any crazy upgrade paths like the good old libstdc++ bump?
--
Jim Ramsay
Gentoo/Linux Developer (rox,gkrellm)
signa
get your "waaait dont do it" votes in now, i plan on pushing:
glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
in the next day or so
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Thursday 05 July 2007, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-06-27 at 12:31 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > maintaining arch things across multiple operating systems is boring me so
> > i'd like to start moving to profiles that outline arch-specific details
> >
> > for example:
> > default-lin
On Thu, 05 Jul 2007 15:20:55 -0700
Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-07-04 at 18:23 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
> > How is being a devrel member important for the table? I don't think
> > it's any more special than any other TLP.
>
> It is very important in the case of Coun
Chris Gianelloni kirjoitti:
> On Wed, 2007-07-04 at 18:23 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
>> How is being a devrel member important for the table? I don't think it's
>> any more special than any other TLP.
>
> It is very important in the case of Council members as the Council is
> the escalation point
On Wed, 2007-07-04 at 18:23 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
> How is being a devrel member important for the table? I don't think it's
> any more special than any other TLP.
It is very important in the case of Council members as the Council is
the escalation point for Developer Relations appeals.
--
On Mon, 2007-07-02 at 21:10 +0200, Torsten Veller wrote:
> Chris Gianelloni wolf31o2
While I thank you for the nomination for next year's Gentoo Council, I
have decided that I no longer wish to be associated with the Gentoo
Council or any other form of "management" or "leadership" within G
On Wed, 2007-06-27 at 12:31 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> maintaining arch things across multiple operating systems is boring me so i'd
> like to start moving to profiles that outline arch-specific details
>
> for example:
> default-linux/parent:
> ../base
> default-linux/sh/parent:
>
Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> On Wed, 04 Jul 2007 15:28:04 +0100
> Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> It maybe be Published by some group, but they seem to make no
>> restrictions whatsoever. As such, I'd personally feel quite happy
>> using it as-is; I don't think they much care either way :-)
On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 01:48:20PM +0200, Luca Barbato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> is there a script to mimic bx in irssi or epic5?
>
> lu
There are specific scripts to minic specific functionality, so whatever
you're missing can probably be replicated. Find a #irssi :)
tomaw
pgpmZ7Wi0X
Hi Luca
On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 01:14:00PM +0200, Luca Barbato wrote:
> Workalike client suggested?
After using BitchX for several years, I switch to irssi like 2.5 years
ago. It felt like the most similar client, altough they're a bit
different.
Greets,
Michael
--
http://hansmi.ch/
pgp2G8WM
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Luca Barbato wrote:
>
> Workalike client suggested?
>
> lu
>
epic5,epic4,irssi,ircii,ninja,scrollz,weechat
:)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFGj
Markus Ullmann wrote:
> As we know from previous bugs and mails here on -dev, bitchx is pretty
> much unmaintained and now has an open security bug.
>
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=183149
>
> So if no-one wants to take it, p.masking it in a week from now and
> remove it regular 30 day
As we know from previous bugs and mails here on -dev, bitchx is pretty
much unmaintained and now has an open security bug.
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=183149
So if no-one wants to take it, p.masking it in a week from now and
remove it regular 30 days after.
-Jokey
signature.asc
De
--- Christian Faulhammer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is a
> PDEPEND possible?
I followed your suggestion and posted a couple of
ebuilds for the upcoming Shorewall 4 package:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=174588
I am not seeing cyclic dependency issues anymore.
Thanks for any suggest
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 05:07:28 +0200
Marius Mauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please reply on gentoo-portage-dev, _not_ on gentoo-dev, thanks.
>
> One missing feature in portage is the lack of package sets. Before we
> (re)start working on that however I'd like to get some feedback about
> what pr
20 matches
Mail list logo
