Ciaran McCreesh kirjoitti:
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 17:19:55 -0500
Doug Klima <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, that depends upon whether you want it to be part of the C/P-V
metadata... If you do, it's a cache format change (and you can't
easily do DEPRECATED_*). But then, deprecation is a property of
On Monday 18 February 2008, Doug Klima wrote:
> Potentially doing something like:
> DEPRECIATED="$DEPRECATED $ECLASS"
> at the top of each deprecated eclass.
Adding deprecation info directly into the eclass file feels wrong to me.
(Eclasses are free software after all and can be reused - ok, nobo
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 16:26:11 -0600
Ryan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 13:54:34 -0800
Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/portage/main/trunk/bin/isolated-functions.sh?r1=9118&r2=9140
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 16:26:11 -0600
Ryan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 13:54:34 -0800
> > Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/portage/main/trunk/bin/isolated-functions.sh?r1=9118&r2=9140
> >> Alright
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 13:54:34 -0800
Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/portage/main/trunk/bin/isolated-functions.sh?r1=9118&r2=9140
Alright, so portage has put this stuff to stderr since January 4.
Then why are we also adding wo
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 17:19:55 -0500
Doug Klima <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Well, that depends upon whether you want it to be part of the C/P-V
> > metadata... If you do, it's a cache format change (and you can't
> > easily do DEPRECATED_*). But then, deprecation is a property of the
> > eclass, n
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 15:43:56 -0500
Doug Klima <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ok. I guess no one else has any feelings about this.
Potentially doing something like:
DEPRECIATED="$DEPRECATED $ECLASS"
Deprecated != depreciated.
You caught my typo. You clearly stil
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 13:54:34 -0800
Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/portage/main/trunk/bin/isolated-functions.sh?r1=9118&r2=9140
>
> Alright, so portage has put this stuff to stderr since January 4.
> Then why are we also adding workarounds to ind
On 21:37 Mon 18 Feb , Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 13:20:52 -0800
> Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This seems like something ewarn should do on its own.
>
> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/portage/main/trunk/bin/isolated-functions.sh?r1=9118&r2=9140
Alrigh
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 13:20:52 -0800
Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This seems like something ewarn should do on its own.
http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/portage/main/trunk/bin/isolated-functions.sh?r1=9118&r2=9140
http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/eclass/flag-o-mat
On Monday 18 February 2008 21:20:52 Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> > @@ -614,7 +614,7 @@
> > # @DESCRIPTION:
> > # DEPRECATED - Gets the flags needed for "NOW" binding
> > bindnow-flags() {
> > - ewarn "QA: stop using the bindnow-flags function ... simply drop it
> > from your ebuild" + ewarn "QA: s
Why can't every week be like this.
Remove more packages :)
On 2/17/08, Robin H. Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
> from the tree, for the week ending 2008-02-17 23h59 UTC.
>
> Removals:
> media-video/usb-pwc-re
On 18:20 Mon 18 Feb , Sven Wegener (swegener) wrote:
> swegener08/02/18 18:20:47
>
> Modified: flag-o-matic.eclass
> Log:
> redirect the ewarn message to stderr
>
> Revision ChangesPath
> 1.122eclass/flag-o-matic.eclass
>
> file :
> http://sources.
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 15:43:56 -0500
Doug Klima <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok. I guess no one else has any feelings about this.
>
> Potentially doing something like:
>
> DEPRECIATED="$DEPRECATED $ECLASS"
Deprecated != depreciated.
> at the top of each deprecated eclass. In the end $DEPRECATED w
Doug Klima wrote:
Howdy all,
We need to agree upon some syntax which we can mark an eclass as
deprecated and potentially point to a replacement or multiple
replacements.
Discuss.
Ok. I guess no one else has any feelings about this.
Potentially doing something like:
DEPRECIATED="$DEPRECAT
15 matches
Mail list logo
