Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 23:41:17 +0200
> Tiziano Müller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > := only makes sense when something is both a DEPEND and an RDEPEND.
>> > Actual behaviour, for Paludis, is that it rewrites := deps to :=blah
>> > when writing to VDB any time it can, and l
On 23:15 Sun 29 Jun , Fabian Groffen wrote:
> On 29-06-2008 07:29:57 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Saturday 28 June 2008, Petteri Räty wrote:
> > > Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis kirjoitti:
> > > > I would like to suggest that default LDFLAGS in Gentoo contain the
> > > > following f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Duncan wrote:
> "Marijn Schouten (hkBst)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sun, 29 Jun 2008
> 18:20:06 +0200:
>
>> Why can't portage use its own variables and export these with an initial
>> value but not use them f
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2008-06-29 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
xfce-extra/notification-daemon-xfce 2008-06-23 02:16:35 drac
xfce-extra/xfkc 2008-06-23 03:44:30 drac
xfce-extra/xfce4-dev-t
"Marijn Schouten (hkBst)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sun, 29 Jun 2008
18:20:06 +0200:
> Why can't portage use its own variables and export these with an initial
> value but not use them further?
One way of looking at is that these /are/ the PM's own variabl
Hi Marijn,
Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
PV=${PV/0./}
MY_PV=...
As others have said, PV is read only.
to that new ebuild. This is the cleanest way to do it and doesn't require any
variable name changes or any other changes to the ebuild regardless of what it
does. Unfortunately it is also
On 29-06-2008 07:29:57 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Saturday 28 June 2008, Petteri Räty wrote:
> > Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis kirjoitti:
> > > I would like to suggest that default LDFLAGS in Gentoo contain the
> > > following flags: "-Wl,-O1,--hash-style=gnu,--sort-common".
> > >
> >
"Marijn Schouten (hkBst)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Marius Mauch wrote:
> > "Marijn Schouten (hkBst)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Marius Mauch wrote:
> > I don't really see how making PV not read-only is any easier
> > than using MY_PV. Did you expect changing PV to magically
> >
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 9:41 PM, Marijn Schouten (hkBst)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The benefit is being able to automatically reversion an ebuild. Reversioning
> may
> not be necessary very often, but it's annoying when it is and there is no good
> reason that it should. There is no benefit i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marius Mauch wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 18:20:06 +0200
> "Marijn Schouten (hkBst)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Marius Mauch wrote:
>>> On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 15:52:37 +0200
>>> "Marijn Schouten
On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 18:20:06 +0200
"Marijn Schouten (hkBst)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Marius Mauch wrote:
> > On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 15:52:37 +0200
> > "Marijn Schouten (hkBst)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marius Mauch wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 15:52:37 +0200
> "Marijn Schouten (hkBst)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
>>> On Saturday 28 June 2008 17:03:13 Marijn Schouten
On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 15:52:37 +0200
"Marijn Schouten (hkBst)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
> > On Saturday 28 June 2008 17:03:13 Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
> >> PV=${PV/0./}
> >>
> >> to that new ebuild. This is the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
> On Saturday 28 June 2008 17:03:13 Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
>> PV=${PV/0./}
>>
>> to that new ebuild. This is the cleanest way to do it and doesn't require
>> any variable name changes or any other changes to the ebuild
On Tuesday 24 June 2008, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
> Fabian Groffen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > as long as it doesn't go in /base, but in the linux/freebsd profiles
> > instead, it's fine with me.
>
> --has-style=gnu should not be used on non-GLIBC systems (I'm unsure
> about uclibc, but
On Saturday 28 June 2008, Petteri Räty wrote:
> Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis kirjoitti:
> > I would like to suggest that default LDFLAGS in Gentoo contain the
> > following flags: "-Wl,-O1,--hash-style=gnu,--sort-common".
> >
> > -O1 enables some basic optimizations.
>
> At least adding -O1
On Saturday 28 June 2008 17:03:13 Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
> PV=${PV/0./}
>
> to that new ebuild. This is the cleanest way to do it and doesn't require
> any variable name changes or any other changes to the ebuild regardless of
> what it does. Unfortunately it is also illegal per current PMS
17 matches
Mail list logo
