So this is now the third revision of this proposal.
The first two editions are available here.
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/48485
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/49601
Comments are welcome, as are offers to implement it.
Implementations should be a small pyt
Hello again,
Over a year or two ago, it was communicated that it supposedly a policy
that USE=static should only control if a package installs static
libraries INSTEAD of shared libraries, and never to be used to control
if static libraries are installed in _addition_ to shared ones or not.
Pack
Hello,
Recently a big bunch of autotools related bugs were filed, of which
quite a few are quite obvious bugs that need to be fixed, but there are
a few of the kind that I can't agree with without given technical proof
it's a real problem.
So one of those is the "changes both autotools source and
Le lundi 30 juin 2008 à 13:33 -0700, Donnie Berkholz a écrit :
> On 22:04 Mon 30 Jun , Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
> > PS: I'd like to remind users reading here that assigning bugs directly
> > is _bad_ if you didn't perform the above checks. It is _not_ ok to
> > assign bugs just because you
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 10:04:31PM +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
> PS: I'd like to remind users reading here that assigning bugs directly
> is _bad_ if you didn't perform the above checks. It is _not_ ok to
> assign bugs just because you _think_ the package is owned by ${HERD}.
The same goes
On 22:04 Mon 30 Jun , Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
> PS: I'd like to remind users reading here that assigning bugs directly
> is _bad_ if you didn't perform the above checks. It is _not_ ok to
> assign bugs just because you _think_ the package is owned by ${HERD}.
The standard user privileges
Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
> Le lundi 30 juin 2008 à 19:01 +0200, Enrico Weigelt a écrit :
>>
>>
>> Funny, how you all manage to make simple things complicated ;-o
>>
>> I guess nobody considered an trivial solutions like an useflag ...
>
> no, this is not the proper solution. Just consider
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 21:42:49 +0300
Petteri Räty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mike Frysinger kirjoitti:
> > On Saturday 28 June 2008, Petteri Räty wrote:
> >> Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis kirjoitti:
> >>> I would like to suggest that default LDFLAGS in Gentoo contain the
> >>> following flag
Le lundi 30 juin 2008 à 19:01 +0200, Enrico Weigelt a écrit :
>
>
> Funny, how you all manage to make simple things complicated ;-o
>
> I guess nobody considered an trivial solutions like an useflag ...
no, this is not the proper solution. Just consider how bad gtk/gtk2
useflag was and that was
Come on guys, bug wrangling isn't that difficult just read metadata.xml,
if it's not correct, it's not your fault, if it's you misread it, I dare
to except devs won't get angry at it and just reassign to whoever they
see fit with a proper message.
If you're so afraid to make errors, just reassign
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 12:52:02 -0500
"Jeremy Olexa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On a side note: How is the "b-w SOP doc" coming? It is obvious to me
> the b-w is tedious a time consuming so I would like to help every now
> and then but I really am not sure about the rules wrt assignment just
> by lo
Mike Frysinger kirjoitti:
On Saturday 28 June 2008, Petteri Räty wrote:
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis kirjoitti:
I would like to suggest that default LDFLAGS in Gentoo contain the
following flags: "-Wl,-O1,--hash-style=gnu,--sort-common".
-O1 enables some basic optimizations.
At least a
On Monday 30 June 2008, Michael Hammer wrote:
> * Jeremy Olexa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080630 19:53]:
> > [...] IMO, b-w'ing is something that anyone can do.
>
> s/can/should ? I mean bug wrangling is a very important thing
> especially in the sight of users. I'm really willing to help on
> b-w'ing if
* Jeremy Olexa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080630 19:53]:
> [...] IMO, b-w'ing is something that anyone can do.
s/can/should ? I mean bug wrangling is a very important thing
especially in the sight of users. I'm really willing to help on
b-w'ing if it makes sense and is possible.
g, mueli
--
-
Jeremy Olexa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On a side note: How is the "b-w SOP doc" coming? It is obvious to me
> the b-w is tedious a time consuming so I would like to help every now
> and then but I really am not sure about the rules wrt assignment just
> by looking at metadata.xml. IMO, b-w'ing is
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 12:27 PM, Jeroen Roovers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To anyone (else) out there who thinks that bug wranglers should be
> punished when they make mistakes in the heap of unthankful work they
> perform on a more than daily basis, I would like you to know that if
> you reassi
To anyone (else) out there who thinks that bug wranglers should be
punished when they make mistakes in the heap of unthankful work they
perform on a more than daily basis, I would like you to know that if
you reassign bugs (back) to bug-wranglers@ without properly
communicating the reason you are d
On 30-06-2008 17:35:08 +0200, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
> > How can you easily revert it in a profile?
>
> You can set LDFLAGS="" in a subprofiles's make.defaults.
How elegant... but I guess I'll have no choice.
--
Fabian Groffen
Gentoo on a different level
--
gentoo-dev@list
Funny, how you all manage to make simple things complicated ;-o
I guess nobody considered an trivial solutions like an useflag ...
cu
--
-
Enrico Weigelt== metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/
-
2008-06-30 10:57:21 Fabian Groffen napisał(a):
> On 29-06-2008 20:28:39 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> > On 23:15 Sun 29 Jun , Fabian Groffen wrote:
> > > On 29-06-2008 07:29:57 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > > On Saturday 28 June 2008, Petteri Räty wrote:
> > > > > Arfrever Frehtes Taifer
Hi,
# Christian Faulhammer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (30 Jun 2008)
# Masked for removal for license issues, see bug 230157
mail-client/claws-mail-pdf-viewer
V-Li
--
Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode
http://www.faulhammer.org/>
Hi,
# Christian Faulhammer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (30 Jun 2008)
# Masked for removal for license issues, see bug 230157
mail-client/claws-mail-pdf-viewer
V-Li
--
Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode
http://www.faulhammer.org/>
On 29-06-2008 20:28:39 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> On 23:15 Sun 29 Jun , Fabian Groffen wrote:
> > On 29-06-2008 07:29:57 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > On Saturday 28 June 2008, Petteri Räty wrote:
> > > > Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis kirjoitti:
> > > > > I would like to suggest
23 matches
Mail list logo
