Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 23:41:17 +0200
Tiziano Müller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:= only makes sense when something is both a DEPEND and an RDEPEND.
Actual behaviour, for Paludis, is that it rewrites := deps to :=blah
when writing to VDB any time it can, and leaves
On 29-06-2008 20:28:39 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
On 23:15 Sun 29 Jun , Fabian Groffen wrote:
On 29-06-2008 07:29:57 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Saturday 28 June 2008, Petteri Räty wrote:
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis kirjoitti:
I would like to suggest that default
Hi,
# Christian Faulhammer [EMAIL PROTECTED] (30 Jun 2008)
# Masked for removal for license issues, see bug 230157
mail-client/claws-mail-pdf-viewer
V-Li
--
Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project
URL:http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode
Hi,
# Christian Faulhammer [EMAIL PROTECTED] (30 Jun 2008)
# Masked for removal for license issues, see bug 230157
mail-client/claws-mail-pdf-viewer
V-Li
--
Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project
URL:http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode
2008-06-30 10:57:21 Fabian Groffen napisał(a):
On 29-06-2008 20:28:39 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
On 23:15 Sun 29 Jun , Fabian Groffen wrote:
On 29-06-2008 07:29:57 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Saturday 28 June 2008, Petteri Räty wrote:
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
big_snip
Funny, how you all manage to make simple things complicated ;-o
I guess nobody considered an trivial solutions like an useflag ...
cu
--
-
Enrico Weigelt== metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/
On 30-06-2008 17:35:08 +0200, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
How can you easily revert it in a profile?
You can set LDFLAGS= in a subprofiles's make.defaults.
How elegant... but I guess I'll have no choice.
--
Fabian Groffen
Gentoo on a different level
--
To anyone (else) out there who thinks that bug wranglers should be
punished when they make mistakes in the heap of unthankful work they
perform on a more than daily basis, I would like you to know that if
you reassign bugs (back) to bug-wranglers@ without properly
communicating the reason you are
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 12:27 PM, Jeroen Roovers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To anyone (else) out there who thinks that bug wranglers should be
punished when they make mistakes in the heap of unthankful work they
perform on a more than daily basis, I would like you to know that if
you reassign
Jeremy Olexa [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On a side note: How is the b-w SOP doc coming? It is obvious to me
the b-w is tedious a time consuming so I would like to help every now
and then but I really am not sure about the rules wrt assignment just
by looking at metadata.xml. IMO, b-w'ing is
* Jeremy Olexa [EMAIL PROTECTED] [080630 19:53]:
[...] IMO, b-w'ing is something that anyone can do.
s/can/should ? I mean bug wrangling is a very important thing
especially in the sight of users. I'm really willing to help on
b-w'ing if it makes sense and is possible.
g, mueli
--
On Monday 30 June 2008, Michael Hammer wrote:
* Jeremy Olexa [EMAIL PROTECTED] [080630 19:53]:
[...] IMO, b-w'ing is something that anyone can do.
s/can/should ? I mean bug wrangling is a very important thing
especially in the sight of users. I'm really willing to help on
b-w'ing if it
Mike Frysinger kirjoitti:
On Saturday 28 June 2008, Petteri Räty wrote:
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis kirjoitti:
I would like to suggest that default LDFLAGS in Gentoo contain the
following flags: -Wl,-O1,--hash-style=gnu,--sort-common.
-O1 enables some basic optimizations.
At least
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 12:52:02 -0500
Jeremy Olexa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On a side note: How is the b-w SOP doc coming? It is obvious to me
the b-w is tedious a time consuming so I would like to help every now
and then but I really am not sure about the rules wrt assignment just
by looking at
Come on guys, bug wrangling isn't that difficult just read metadata.xml,
if it's not correct, it's not your fault, if it's you misread it, I dare
to except devs won't get angry at it and just reassign to whoever they
see fit with a proper message.
If you're so afraid to make errors, just reassign
Le lundi 30 juin 2008 à 19:01 +0200, Enrico Weigelt a écrit :
big_snip
Funny, how you all manage to make simple things complicated ;-o
I guess nobody considered an trivial solutions like an useflag ...
no, this is not the proper solution. Just consider how bad gtk/gtk2
useflag was and that
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 21:42:49 +0300
Petteri Räty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mike Frysinger kirjoitti:
On Saturday 28 June 2008, Petteri Räty wrote:
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis kirjoitti:
I would like to suggest that default LDFLAGS in Gentoo contain the
following flags:
Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
Le lundi 30 juin 2008 à 19:01 +0200, Enrico Weigelt a écrit :
big_snip
Funny, how you all manage to make simple things complicated ;-o
I guess nobody considered an trivial solutions like an useflag ...
no, this is not the proper solution. Just consider how
On 22:04 Mon 30 Jun , Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
PS: I'd like to remind users reading here that assigning bugs directly
is _bad_ if you didn't perform the above checks. It is _not_ ok to
assign bugs just because you _think_ the package is owned by ${HERD}.
The standard user privileges
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 10:04:31PM +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
PS: I'd like to remind users reading here that assigning bugs directly
is _bad_ if you didn't perform the above checks. It is _not_ ok to
assign bugs just because you _think_ the package is owned by ${HERD}.
The same goes
Le lundi 30 juin 2008 à 13:33 -0700, Donnie Berkholz a écrit :
On 22:04 Mon 30 Jun , Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
PS: I'd like to remind users reading here that assigning bugs directly
is _bad_ if you didn't perform the above checks. It is _not_ ok to
assign bugs just because you
Hello,
Recently a big bunch of autotools related bugs were filed, of which
quite a few are quite obvious bugs that need to be fixed, but there are
a few of the kind that I can't agree with without given technical proof
it's a real problem.
So one of those is the changes both autotools source and
Hello again,
Over a year or two ago, it was communicated that it supposedly a policy
that USE=static should only control if a package installs static
libraries INSTEAD of shared libraries, and never to be used to control
if static libraries are installed in _addition_ to shared ones or not.
23 matches
Mail list logo
