On Thu, 2009-02-05 at 00:37 +, Angelo Arrifano wrote:
> On Qua, 2009-02-04 at 18:36 +0200, Petteri Räty wrote:
> Some packages are not automake driven. We have to detect those.
> >
> > > make DESTDIR=${D} PREFIX=/usr \
> > > STRIP=true ENABLE_NLS=${USE_NLS} \
> > >
Angelo Arrifano wrote:
> On Qua, 2009-02-04 at 18:36 +0200, Petteri Räty wrote:
>> Angelo Arrifano wrote:
>>> # Copyright 2008 Gentoo Foundation
>>> # Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2
>>> # $Header: $
>>> #
>>> # Authors:
>>> # Rene Wagner
>>> # Ned Ludd
>>> # Ange
On Qua, 2009-02-04 at 18:36 +0200, Petteri Räty wrote:
> Angelo Arrifano wrote:
> >
> > # Copyright 2008 Gentoo Foundation
> > # Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2
> > # $Header: $
> > #
> > # Authors:
> > # Rene Wagner
> > # Ned Ludd
> > # Angelo Arrifano
> >
>
Angelo Arrifano wrote:
>
> # Copyright 2008 Gentoo Foundation
> # Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2
> # $Header: $
> #
> # Authors:
> # Rene Wagner
> # Ned Ludd
> # Angelo Arrifano
>
Should use eclass-manpages syntax.
>
> # GPE ECLASS
> #GPECONF=""
On Qua, 2009-02-04 at 13:56 +0200, Petteri Räty wrote:
> Angelo Arrifano wrote:
> >
> > Since we are maintaining this over half a year now, we think that its
> > time to finally starting moving step-by-step the GPE suite into the
> > portage tree - starting with the eclass and toplevel categories.
Angelo Arrifano wrote:
>
> Since we are maintaining this over half a year now, we think that its
> time to finally starting moving step-by-step the GPE suite into the
> portage tree - starting with the eclass and toplevel categories.
>
Please start by posting the new eclasses for review then.
R
Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 6:47 AM, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
I agree that a tag kind of approach would be nice. Someone should
actually do work on it.
Here's a random similar idea that I think might work well as a GLEP
proposition, that I was about to reply to a different subthr
