> On Fri, 26 Jun 2009, Dale wrote:
> I would like to see what you guys think about a small feature. Is
> there a way to put a number next to each item and then we can select
> by the number instead of typing the LONG name for the item? Sort of
> like gcc-config -l does its listing and you can
AllenJB wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As a user, I'd like to encourage developers to make use of news items
> (eselect news) for important changes. I find them much more noticeable
> than elog messages (which, while I have set them up so they get
> emailed to me, I admit I don't always read). I think they'r
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> On 25-06-2009 22:57:08 +0100, AllenJB wrote:
>> As a user, I'd like to encourage developers to make use of news items
>> (eselect news) for important changes. I find them much more noticeable
>> than elog messages (which, while I have set th
This week has been much slower with the image builder project. I've
wrinkled out several issues and generally worked on usability and
other frontend aspects. The backend (and frontend) currently handle
building a complete tar/gz image and letting the user download it with
the user's choice of pro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Fabian Groffen wrote:
> On 25-06-2009 22:57:08 +0100, AllenJB wrote:
>> As a user, I'd like to encourage developers to make use of news items
>> (eselect news) for important changes. I find them much more noticeable
>> than elog messages (which, whil
On 25-06-2009 22:57:08 +0100, AllenJB wrote:
> As a user, I'd like to encourage developers to make use of news items
> (eselect news) for important changes. I find them much more noticeable
> than elog messages (which, while I have set them up so they get emailed
> to me, I admit I don't always
Richard Freeman wrote:
> I suspect most devs just avoid the drama.
++
Less worrying, more working
--
Jim Ramsay
Gentoo Developer (rox/fluxbox/gkrellm/vim)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Казанков Александр Владимирович wrote:
> Hello.
Hi,
Could you please file all this information (and the output from "emerge
- --info" at https://bugs.gentoo.org/. This mailing list is for technical
discussions, whereas the bug tracker at https://bug
Hello.
I wish to compile library libstdc ++ being based on
sys-dev/gcc/gcc-4.3.2-r3.ebuild:
src_compile() {
gcc_do_filter_flags
einfo "CFLAGS=\"${CFLAGS}\""
einfo "CXXFLAGS=\"${CXXFLAGS}\""
# Build in a separate build tree
mkdir -p "${WORKDIR}"/build
pushd "${WORKDIR}"/b
Ben de Groot wrote:
In my opinion it is in the best interest of Gentoo at this point to
ignore Exherbo and to silence those people involved with Exherbo that
have been so divisive and generated so much conflict in Gentoo channels.
Nobody needs to be silenced (unless they're litereally spammin
On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 14:46 +0200, Ben de Groot wrote:
> Wulf C. Krueger wrote:
> > I think it would be in the best interest of both Exherbo and Gentoo to
> > elect
> > [...] to the Gentoo Council.
>
> I would think the only thing that matters is the best interest of
> Gentoo. This is after all
Ben de Groot wrote:
> I would think the only thing that matters is the best interest of
> Gentoo. This is after all the _Gentoo_ Council we're speaking of, not a
> body that is concerned with non-Gentoo matters.
++
> In my opinion it is in the best interest of Gentoo at this point to
> ignore
Patrick Kursawe wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to introduce a new USE_EXPAND variable for the about 80
> different SANE backends to make it a bit easier than looking into the
> source if you want to find possible backends and a bit harder to pick
> invalid backend names. Any objections or quest
Denis Dupeyron wrote:
> I'd be ready to believe part of it was that he wanted to
> experiment. And experiments sometimes succeed, or sometimes they fail,
Well, experimentation is OK (and I would encourage it for many things),
but I'm not sure I'd agree that experimentally giving someone council
po
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 6:46 AM, Ben de Groot wrote:
> To appoint as proxy for a council meeting someone who has been booted
> from Gentoo is a clear lapse of judgement, and would in my eyes
> disqualify the involved council member from functioning in that position.
As Petteri noted it's not obvio
Wulf C. Krueger wrote:
> I think it would be in the best interest of both Exherbo and Gentoo to elect
> [...] to the Gentoo Council.
I would think the only thing that matters is the best interest of
Gentoo. This is after all the _Gentoo_ Council we're speaking of, not a
body that is concerned wit
AllenJB wrote:
> As a user, I'd like to encourage developers to make use of news items
> (eselect news) for important changes.
> 2 recent changes I would suggest having news items for are the libpcre
> .la files issue, because it often doesn't get noticed until later when
> builds fail, and the m
On Fri, 26 Jun 2009 12:04:14 +0530
Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
> Oh so you'll argue semantics now? The spirit of the rule is
> excessively clear. No non-gentoo-developer can be a member of council
> -- permanent, temporary, or proxy.
The spirit and the letter of the rules are clear: the electorate ca
18 matches
Mail list logo
