Re: [gentoo-dev] Support for multiple ABIs (for Python modules etc.)

2009-08-06 Thread Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
2009-08-01 20:10:49 Ciaran McCreesh napisaƂ(a): > On Sat, 25 Jul 2009 12:28:44 +0200 > Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: > > I would like to present the plan of support for multiple ABIs. It > > should be sufficient for Python modules and might be also appropriate > > for some other ABI t

Re: [gentoo-dev] New 10.0 profiles are in repository

2009-08-06 Thread Alex Alexander
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 22:17, Zac Medico wrote: > It would be pretty trivial to use a PORTAGE_PROFILES variable in > make.conf, to replace /etc/make.profile. You could do something like > this: > > PORTAGE_PROFILES="/usr/portage/profiles/desktop > /usr/portage/profiles/gnome" > > You could use this

Re: [gentoo-dev] New 10.0 profiles are in repository

2009-08-06 Thread Zac Medico
Josh Saddler wrote: > Mart Raudsepp wrote: >> I wanted to work at some point on splitting out gnome and kde profiles >> to separate ones. Perhaps desktop profile could be a generic universal >> one with USE flags enabled that rox/lxde/fluxbox and so on would like as >> well, and then gnome adds its

Re: [gentoo-dev] New 10.0 profiles are in repository

2009-08-06 Thread Josh Saddler
Mart Raudsepp wrote: > I wanted to work at some point on splitting out gnome and kde profiles > to separate ones. Perhaps desktop profile could be a generic universal > one with USE flags enabled that rox/lxde/fluxbox and so on would like as > well, and then gnome adds its stuff, and kde adds its o

Re: [gentoo-dev] New 10.0 profiles are in repository

2009-08-06 Thread Mart Raudsepp
On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 17:19 +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote: > Jeremy Olexa wrote: > > Samuli Suominen wrote: > >> As subject says, > >> default/linux/*/10.0 > >> default/hardened/linux/*/10.0 > >> Profiles are up, the 10.0 releng / 10th anniversary ones. > >> > > Given the multi-inheritance nature of

[gentoo-dev] ABI compliance checker

2009-08-06 Thread Andrey Ponomarenko
Colleagues, I'm software engineer from Institute for System Programing of Russian Academy of Sciences and we are developing a free lightweight tool for checking backward/forward binary compatibility of shared C/C++ libraries in OS Linux. It checks interface signatures and data type definitions

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: gcc-4.4 unmasking soon

2009-08-06 Thread Samuli Suominen
Ryan Hill wrote: > On Tue, 4 Aug 2009 21:15:57 -0400 > Mark Loeser wrote: > >> I'd really like to unmask gcc-4.4.1 soon, as in the next week or so. >> If you could please install it and test it out, I would appreciate it. >> Also, if you have any gcc 4.4 porting bugs assigned to a herd that you >

Re: [gentoo-dev] New 10.0 profiles are in repository

2009-08-06 Thread Samuli Suominen
Jeremy Olexa wrote: > Samuli Suominen wrote: >> As subject says, >> default/linux/*/10.0 >> default/hardened/linux/*/10.0 >> Profiles are up, the 10.0 releng / 10th anniversary ones. >> > Given the multi-inheritance nature of profiles, it is not obvious what > changed to me. So, what is new with 10

Re: [gentoo-dev] New 10.0 profiles are in repository

2009-08-06 Thread Jeremy Olexa
Samuli Suominen wrote: As subject says, default/linux/*/10.0 default/hardened/linux/*/10.0 Profiles are up, the 10.0 releng / 10th anniversary ones. All new development is to be done with these. For users of 2008.0 this doesn't mean much as they are cloned ones. New LiveCD's will be based on

[gentoo-dev] New 10.0 profiles are in repository

2009-08-06 Thread Samuli Suominen
As subject says, default/linux/*/10.0 default/hardened/linux/*/10.0 Profiles are up, the 10.0 releng / 10th anniversary ones. All new development is to be done with these. For users of 2008.0 this doesn't mean much as they are cloned ones. New LiveCD's will be based on 10.0. For arch's & hard