Am Montag, den 28.09.2009, 20:23 +0200 schrieb Sebastian Pipping:
repositories.xml
=
repo
name=sping
quality=experimental
status=unofficial
descriptionGentoo overlay of Sebastian Pipping/description
On Mon, 28 Sep 2009 20:23:34 +0200
Sebastian Pipping webmas...@hartwork.org wrote:
Now please ask questions and let us know what you think.
Here's an alternative idea:
* Move the repository information into the overlays themselves. Require
overlays to provide a file containing the
Tiziano Müller wrote:
Am Montag, den 28.09.2009, 20:23 +0200 schrieb Sebastian Pipping:
repositories.xml
=
repo
name=sping
quality=experimental
status=unofficial
descriptionGentoo overlay of
On 30-09-2009 17:36:47 +0200, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
Tiziano Müller wrote:
Am Montag, den 28.09.2009, 20:23 +0200 schrieb Sebastian Pipping:
repositories.xml
=
repo
name=sping
quality=experimental
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Mon, 28 Sep 2009 20:23:34 +0200
Sebastian Pipping webmas...@hartwork.org wrote:
Now please ask questions and let us know what you think.
Here's an alternative idea:
* Move the repository information into the overlays themselves. Require
overlays to provide a
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 17:51:02 +0200
Sebastian Pipping webmas...@hartwork.org wrote:
At the moment moving overlay meta info into the overlays does not seem
like a good idea to. It would mean that any script working with
overlays needs to check the repo out to get to that data. That
doesn't
Fabian Groffen wrote:
Point remains that it looks in-consistant, for repo, name is an
attribute, while for owner it is a sub-element. Why having attributes
in the first place anyway?
It's closer to the original layman-global.txt which also makes the
converter scripts simpler (and faster) than
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 17:51:02 +0200
Sebastian Pipping webmas...@hartwork.org wrote:
At the moment moving overlay meta info into the overlays does not seem
like a good idea to. It would mean that any script working with
overlays needs to check the repo out to get to that
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 18:00:13 +0200
Sebastian Pipping webmas...@hartwork.org wrote:
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 17:51:02 +0200
Sebastian Pipping webmas...@hartwork.org wrote:
At the moment moving overlay meta info into the overlays does not
seem like a good idea to. It
Zac Medico wrote:
I propose support for license groups in ebuilds then, I guess.
That seems like a reasonable solution. So, an ebuild can do
something like LICENSE=@GPL-2+ and that will expand to whatever
the definition of the GPL-2+ license group happens to be. When a new
version of GPL
10 matches
Mail list logo