[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] News item: 2010-03-01 MythTV 0.22 Upgrade Database Corruption

2010-02-26 Thread Ben de Groot
-- Forwarded message -- From: Alec Warner anta...@gentoo.org Date: 26 February 2010 04:52 Subject: Re: [RFC] News item: 2010-03-01 MythTV 0.22 Upgrade Database Corruption To: Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org Cc: p...@gentoo.org Is there a simple way for users to determine what

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] News item: 2010-03-01 MythTV 0.22 Upgrade Database Corruption

2010-02-26 Thread Richard Freeman
On 02/26/2010 07:06 AM, Ben de Groot wrote: Is there a simple way for users to determine what client versions they may have? Forwarding my reply: Well, they can always just ask the package manager what version is installed. The news item is targeted only at users who do not already have

Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] Making repoman/metagen check for validity of herds

2010-02-26 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Donnerstag, den 25.02.2010, 19:06 +0100 schrieb Sebastian Pipping: I agree that additional repoman checks can help to improve quality in Gentoo... It seems that currently neither metagen nor repoman check what I put in for herd (i.e. if such a herd exists or not). Does anyone feel

Re: [gentoo-dev] metadata.xml: changepolicies

2010-02-26 Thread Alec Warner
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 12:53 PM, Sebastian Pipping sp...@gentoo.org wrote: Stop. Is introduction of such a high level of bureaucracy really a good idea? In my eyes it could backfire and make matters worse as people either - start ignoring it due to high noise - reduce people's activity

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-forensics/samhain: ChangeLog samhain-2.6.2.ebuild

2010-02-26 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 02/26/2010 10:49 PM, Patrick Lauer (patrick) wrote: patrick 10/02/26 20:49:19 Modified: ChangeLog Added:samhain-2.6.2.ebuild Log: Bump (Portage version: 2.2_rc63/cvs/Linux x86_64) Index: samhain-2.6.2.ebuild

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-forensics/zzuf: ChangeLog zzuf-0.13.ebuild

2010-02-26 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 02/26/2010 10:50 PM, Patrick Lauer (patrick) wrote: patrick 10/02/26 20:50:29 Modified: ChangeLog Added:zzuf-0.13.ebuild Log: Bump (Portage version: 2.2_rc63/cvs/Linux x86_64) 1.1 app-forensics/zzuf/zzuf-0.13.ebuild file :

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-forensics/samhain: ChangeLog samhain-2.6.2.ebuild

2010-02-26 Thread Patrick Lauer
On 02/26/10 22:01, Samuli Suominen wrote: On 02/26/2010 10:49 PM, Patrick Lauer (patrick) wrote: patrick 10/02/26 20:49:19 Modified: ChangeLog Added:samhain-2.6.2.ebuild Log: Bump (Portage version: 2.2_rc63/cvs/Linux x86_64) Index:

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-forensics/zzuf: ChangeLog zzuf-0.13.ebuild

2010-02-26 Thread Patrick Lauer
On 02/26/10 22:02, Samuli Suominen wrote: On 02/26/2010 10:50 PM, Patrick Lauer (patrick) wrote: src_test() { if hasq sandbox ${FEATURES}; then ewarn zzuf tests don't work correctly when sandbox is enabled, ewarn skipping tests. If you want to run the

[gentoo-dev] Marking bugs for bugday?

2010-02-26 Thread Sebastian Pipping
Hello! I'm surprised that there is no keyword in Gentoo's bugzilla [1] to mark bugs for bugday. Is there a good reason why such a keyword does not exist? Would it be hard to set up? Thanks, Sebastian [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/describekeywords.cgi

[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] Move regex creation out of PhaseCheck constructor (Revision: 15458)

2010-02-26 Thread Sebastian Pipping
From a07a07166354e328711d1574eb06f7d357f21907 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sebastian Pipping sebast...@pipping.org Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 21:19:06 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Move regex creation out of PhaseCheck constructor --- pym/repoman/checks.py | 16 +--- 1 files changed, 9

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] Move regex creation out of PhaseCheck constructor (Revision: 15458)

2010-02-26 Thread Zac Medico
Thanks, your patch is in svn r15470 (with tweaks by myself). -- Thanks, Zac

[gentoo-portage-dev] Composite exceptions?

2010-02-26 Thread Sebastian Pipping
Hello! I was wondering how to best handle a case with functions that I would like to collect several exceptions from. Is there an existing standard way to solve this? I was thinking of using the composite pattern for this allowing to throw a tree of exceptions with the option to flatten it for

[gentoo-portage-dev] VCS used for development of portage

2010-02-26 Thread Sebastian Pipping
Hello! Is moving portage development over to Git planned anytime soon? Anything keeping you from the move? Anything I can do to speed it up? Sebastian

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Composite exceptions?

2010-02-26 Thread Zac Medico
On 02/26/2010 07:11 PM, Sebastian Pipping wrote: Hello! I was wondering how to best handle a case with functions that I would like to collect several exceptions from. Is there an existing standard way to solve this? I was thinking of using the composite pattern for this allowing to

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] VCS used for development of portage

2010-02-26 Thread Zac Medico
On 02/26/2010 07:18 PM, Sebastian Pipping wrote: Hello! Is moving portage development over to Git planned anytime soon? Yes, we've been discussing it on this bug: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=196025 Anything keeping you from the move? Well, the repository layout is somewhat

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Composite exceptions?

2010-02-26 Thread Sebastian Pipping
On 02/27/10 04:20, Zac Medico wrote: Do you have an example case where you want to use this? Multiple defects in metadata.xml are such a case. At some point all the exceptions will have to collected, e.g. two invalid herds are mentioned. In that case a single exception with a list of invalid

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Composite exceptions?

2010-02-26 Thread Brian Harring
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 05:02:18AM +0100, Sebastian Pipping wrote: On 02/27/10 04:20, Zac Medico wrote: Do you have an example case where you want to use this? Multiple defects in metadata.xml are such a case. At some point all the exceptions will have to collected, e.g. two invalid herds

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Composite exceptions?

2010-02-26 Thread Zac Medico
On 02/26/2010 08:27 PM, Brian Harring wrote: On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 05:02:18AM +0100, Sebastian Pipping wrote: On 02/27/10 04:20, Zac Medico wrote: Do you have an example case where you want to use this? Multiple defects in metadata.xml are such a case. At some point all the exceptions will