On Sunday 21 March 2010 17:22:55 Thomas Sachau wrote: Am 21.03.2010 18:06, schrieb Mike Frysinger: On Sunday 21 March 2010 08:41:15 Thomas Sachau wrote: I see, that the sgml herd seems to be empty for a longer time, so i would like to ask, if someone wants to take that herd and the related ebuilds and bugs over or if we should delete that herd and assign related ebuilds/bugs to m-n. if someone were to step up, we'd have to undo any changes we just did. why not add m-n to the herd definition. What exactly do you suggest? My suggestion is to give people some time to join that herd (which had open bugs back from 2006!) for some time and if nothing happens, remove this unused herd and assign bugs and ebuilds to m-n, so people at least see, that those ebuilds are not maintained, instead of getting the false impression of maintainership by an empty herd. deleting logical herds and updating all the xml files takes effort, as does reverting those changes when someone steps up. from what i can see, there is no gain doing this. simple mark the herd itself as m-n, update the staffing needs page, and then re-assign the bugs to m-n while keeping sgml herd in the cc. -mike signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 02:25:43AM -0100, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: Here is a list of the packages that would be moved to maintainer-wanted: app-doc/halibut app-office/passepartout app-text/asciidoc app-text/build-docbook-catalog app-text/docbook2X app-text/docbook-dsssl-stylesheets app-text/docbook-sgml-dtd app-text/docbook-sgml app-text/docbook-sgml-utils app-text/docbook-xml-dtd app-text/docbook-xml-simple-dtd app-text/docbook-xsl-stylesheets app-text/gentoo-guide-xml-dtd app-text/grutatxt app-text/html2text app-text/html401 app-text/htmlrecode app-text/htmltidy app-text/html-xml-utils app-text/linuxdoc-tools app-text/openjade app-text/opensp app-text/robodoc app-text/sablotron app-text/sgml-common app-text/sgmltools-lite app-text/sgrep app-text/txt2tags app-text/xhtml1 app-text/xml2doc app-text/xml2 app-text/xmlformat app-text/xmlstarlet app-text/xmlto www-client/htmlview The following packages would be dropped to the remaining maintainers: app-emacs/nxml-mode (emacs) app-emacs/psgml (emacs) app-text/gnome-doc-utils (gnome) app-text/highlight (tex) app-text/scrollkeeper-dtd (gnome) app-text/scrollkeeper (gnome) app-text/webgen (ruby) dev-ruby/xml-simple (ruby) A lot of useful stuff here. I've added myself and tampakrap to the sgml herd, we'll try to keep it in good shape :) -- Alex Alexander :: wired Gentoo Developer www.linuxized.com pgpug5W71Iomd.pgp Description: PGP signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 # Tomáš Chvátal scarab...@gentoo.org (22 Mar 2010) # QA: removal on 22. 5. 2010 # Masked for removal due to major packaging issues # that were not addressed by maintainers in timely # manner. See bug #150091. app-forensics/samhain -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkunjicACgkQHB6c3gNBRYe1yQCeLB6YlbqeByPhSRNVQMmEkpSg DOIAmQEON1ibqyQcdYspfEaL9qHrjsmA =uZ3x -END PGP SIGNATURE-
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 10:11, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis arfre...@gentoo.org wrote: 2010-03-20 01:51:44 Duncan napisał(a): So let's just recognize that it's not a perfect situation, create a news item saying that python-3 will soon (give a date) be unmasked, and suggest that users not needing it may wish to package.mask it themselves, with a link to documentation with specific instructions and a bit more detail on why they might wish to mask it and under what circumstances they might not. I'd suggest an unmasking date 30 days after the release of the news item. Python 3 is not masked. The discussion is about stabilization. Duncan's comments still apply, though, right? What's against writing a news item about stabilizing Python? -- Jacob For then there will be great distress, unequaled from the beginning of the world until now — and never to be equaled again. If those days had not been cut short, no one would survive, but for the sake of the elect those days will be shortened. Are you ready?