On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 10:11, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
<arfre...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> 2010-03-20 01:51:44 Duncan napisał(a):
>> So let's just recognize that it's not a perfect situation, create a news
>> item saying that python-3 will soon (give a date) be unmasked, and suggest
>> that users not needing it may wish to package.mask it themselves, with a
>> link to documentation with specific instructions and a bit more detail on
>> why they might wish to mask it and under what circumstances they might not.
>> I'd suggest an unmasking date 30 days after the release of the news item.
> Python 3 is not masked. The discussion is about stabilization.

Duncan's comments still apply, though, right? What's against writing a
news item about stabilizing Python?


    "For then there will be great distress, unequaled
    from the beginning of the world until now — and never
    to be equaled again. If those days had not been cut
    short, no one would survive, but for the sake of the
    elect those days will be shortened."

    Are you ready?

Reply via email to