Re: [gentoo-dev] New application for gentoo: app-portage/kportagetray

2010-03-26 Thread Locke Shinseiko
On Fri March 26 2010 17:06:58 Ondřej Súkup wrote: > looks good , its support overlays (layman) ?? > Hi, I have been assisting Ronan with coding and maintenance for kportagetray. full layman support is a planned feature, though I need to do some re-design of the GUI first, the tab bar is getting

Re: [gentoo-dev] New application for gentoo: app-portage/kportagetray

2010-03-26 Thread Ondřej Súkup
looks good , its support overlays (layman) ?? 2010/1/5 Ronan Arraes Jardim Chagas : > Hello fellows, > > I started to code a new application to make some daily tasks easier with > portage. It is called KPortageTray. > > It is coded with PyKDE, so, unfortunately (or fortunately :D) you will need >

[gentoo-dev] Re: Python 3.1: Stabilization and news item

2010-03-26 Thread Duncan
George Prowse posted on Fri, 26 Mar 2010 17:53:31 + as excerpted: > On 26/03/2010 17:43, Dale wrote: >> It's not faith, its reality. There will be some people that don't >> subscribe to this list that will do what is above. This IS the reason I >> subscribed to this list. I wanted to know what

Re: [gentoo-dev] Python 3.1: Stabilization and news item

2010-03-26 Thread Dale
George Prowse wrote: On 26/03/2010 17:43, Dale wrote: It's not faith, its reality. There will be some people that don't subscribe to this list that will do what is above. This IS the reason I subscribed to this list. I wanted to know what the devs were doing under the hood that would lead me to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Python 3.1: Stabilization and news item

2010-03-26 Thread George Prowse
On 26/03/2010 17:43, Dale wrote: It's not faith, its reality. There will be some people that don't subscribe to this list that will do what is above. This IS the reason I subscribed to this list. I wanted to know what the devs were doing under the hood that would lead me to screw up my system. It

Re: [gentoo-dev] Python 3.1: Stabilization and news item

2010-03-26 Thread Dale
Alec Warner wrote: On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Dale wrote: Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: 2010-03-26 16:40:37 Brian Harring napisał(a): There really isn't a precedent since upgrades of this sort typically either have extremely locked down deps, or just plai

Re: [gentoo-dev] Python 3.1: Stabilization and news item

2010-03-26 Thread Jeremy Olexa
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:28:29 +, Alec Warner wrote: > On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Dale wrote: >> As a user, I still think this could turn into a real mess.  I think there >> will be quite a few that will see python being updated, run python-updater >> and switch it to the new python.  A

Re: [gentoo-dev] Python 3.1: Stabilization and news item

2010-03-26 Thread Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
2010-03-26 17:15:42 Brian Harring napisał(a): > On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 05:04:28PM +0100, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis > wrote: > > 2010-03-26 16:43:57 Brian Harring napisał(a): > > > On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 03:22:52PM +0100, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar > > > Arahesis wrote: > > > > Arfreve

Re: [gentoo-dev] Python 3.1: Stabilization and news item

2010-03-26 Thread Alec Warner
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Dale wrote: > Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: >> >> 2010-03-26 16:40:37 Brian Harring napisał(a): >> >>> >>> There really isn't a precedent since upgrades of this sort typically >>> either have extremely locked down deps, or just plain don't happen >>> t

Re: [gentoo-dev] Python 3.1: Stabilization and news item

2010-03-26 Thread Brian Harring
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 05:04:28PM +0100, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: > 2010-03-26 16:43:57 Brian Harring napisał(a): > > On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 03:22:52PM +0100, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar > > Arahesis wrote: > > > Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis 2010-03-25 20:05:17 napisał(a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Python 3.1: Stabilization and news item

2010-03-26 Thread Dale
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: 2010-03-26 16:40:37 Brian Harring napisał(a): There really isn't a precedent since upgrades of this sort typically either have extremely locked down deps, or just plain don't happen till the vast majority of depndencies are updated. If in doubt, lo

Re: [gentoo-dev] Python 3.1: Stabilization and news item

2010-03-26 Thread Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
2010-03-26 16:43:57 Brian Harring napisał(a): > On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 03:22:52PM +0100, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis > wrote: > > Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis 2010-03-25 20:05:17 napisał(a): > > > 2010-03-25 19:34:24 Roy Bamford napisał(a): > > > > The case where Python-3 cannot be

Re: [gentoo-dev] Python 3.1: Stabilization and news item

2010-03-26 Thread Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
2010-03-26 16:40:37 Brian Harring napisał(a): > There really isn't a precedent since upgrades of this sort typically > either have extremely locked down deps, or just plain don't happen > till the vast majority of depndencies are updated. If in doubt, look > at the past python upgrades- they've

Re: [gentoo-dev] Python 3.1: Stabilization and news item

2010-03-26 Thread Brian Harring
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 03:22:52PM +0100, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: > Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis 2010-03-25 20:05:17 napisał(a): > > 2010-03-25 19:34:24 Roy Bamford napisał(a): > > > The case where Python-3 cannot be used as the default Python is > > > transitory (it may

Re: [gentoo-dev] Python 3.1: Stabilization and news item

2010-03-26 Thread Brian Harring
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 05:35:19AM -0700, Zac Medico wrote: > On 03/24/2010 08:47 PM, Joshua Saddler wrote: > > On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 16:12:55 -0500 > > William Hubbs wrote: > > > >> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 09:36:52PM +0100, Ben de Groot wrote: > >>> We agree that this is the minimum that should be

Re: [gentoo-dev] Python 3.1: Stabilization and news item

2010-03-26 Thread Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis 2010-03-25 20:05:17 napisał(a): > 2010-03-25 19:34:24 Roy Bamford napisał(a): > > The case where Python-3 cannot be used as the default Python is > > transitory (it may be a long time). > > Gentoo Python Project will soon start supporting setting Python 3 as ma

Re: [gentoo-dev] Python 3.1: Stabilization and news item

2010-03-26 Thread Zac Medico
On 03/24/2010 08:47 PM, Joshua Saddler wrote: > On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 16:12:55 -0500 > William Hubbs wrote: > >> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 09:36:52PM +0100, Ben de Groot wrote: >>> We agree that this is the minimum that should be done. But our >>> Python lead stubbornly refuses to honor this reasonab

Re: [gentoo-dev] Python 3.1: Stabilization and news item

2010-03-26 Thread Pacho Ramos
El vie, 26-03-2010 a las 05:10 -0700, Zac Medico escribió: > > Hello > > > > Maybe I have misunderstood anything (since I don't know much about > > python stuff) but, what would occur if I forget to mask python-3 and > > don't run python-updater. My plans would be to try to delay > > python-update

Re: [gentoo-dev] Python 3.1: Stabilization and news item

2010-03-26 Thread Zac Medico
On 03/26/2010 12:59 AM, Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote: > On Thursday 25 March 2010 20:05:17 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: >> 2010-03-25 19:34:24 Roy Bamford napisał(a): >>> On 2010.03.24 21:12, William Hubbs wrote: >>> The case where Python-3 cannot be used as the default Python is >>

Re: [gentoo-dev] Python 3.1: Stabilization and news item

2010-03-26 Thread Zac Medico
On 03/26/2010 02:02 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > El jue, 25-03-2010 a las 11:37 -0400, Richard Freeman escribió: >> On 03/24/2010 11:47 PM, Joshua Saddler wrote: >>> Even then, it'll likely get >>> installed first, as users will probably learn about p.masking it only >>> *after* they install it. >> >>

Re: [gentoo-dev] Python 3.1: Stabilization and news item

2010-03-26 Thread Pacho Ramos
El jue, 25-03-2010 a las 11:37 -0400, Richard Freeman escribió: > On 03/24/2010 11:47 PM, Joshua Saddler wrote: > > Even then, it'll likely get > > installed first, as users will probably learn about p.masking it only > > *after* they install it. > > I don't have strong feelings on whether having

Re: [gentoo-dev] Python 3.1: Stabilization and news item

2010-03-26 Thread Marijn Schouten (hkBst)
On Thursday 25 March 2010 20:05:17 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: > 2010-03-25 19:34:24 Roy Bamford napisał(a): > > On 2010.03.24 21:12, William Hubbs wrote: > > The case where Python-3 cannot be used as the default Python is > > transitory (it may be a long time). > > Gentoo Python P