The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2010-03-28 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
app-misc/chesstask 2010-03-22 01:47:49 yngwin
app-office/indeview 2010-03-22 01:48:51 yngwin
dev-db/qt-unixODBC
On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 13:09:07 -0700
Brian Harring wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 10:07:52PM +0200, Rennn 'Necoro' Neumann wrote:
> > Am 28.03.2010 21:04, schrieb Brian Harring:
> > > Instead, if the purpose is a "thanks", why not every once in a while
> > > put up a news item discussing the too
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 07:31:10PM +1300, Alistair Bush wrote:
> > On Saturday 27 of March 2010 21:58:41 William Hubbs wrote:
> >
> > It's really freaking silly to wait months for stabilization of some random
> > php/perl library that's known to work.
>
> Have you ever just considered closing the
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 10:07:52PM +0200, Rennn 'Necoro' Neumann wrote:
> Am 28.03.2010 21:04, schrieb Brian Harring:
> > Instead, if the purpose is a "thanks", why not every once in a while
> > put up a news item discussing the tools in question? Such an
> > approach allows folk to focus in on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 28.03.2010 21:04, schrieb Brian Harring:
> Instead, if the purpose is a "thanks", why not every once in a while
> put up a news item discussing the tools in question? Such an
> approach allows folk to focus in on whatever is useful/interesting
>
Skip to the end for a counterproposal...
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 05:13:14PM +1300, Alistair Bush wrote:
> I was just thinking how nice it could be if we acknowledged some of the
> projects that contribute to gentoo but are actually developed primarily
> outside of gentoo's dev community. How ab
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 11:06 PM, Doug Goldstein wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 9:44 AM, Petteri Räty wrote:
>> On 03/24/2010 08:30 PM, Peter Hjalmarsson wrote:
>>
>>> For qemu-kvm the problem is that there is only one implementation (i.e.
>>> gnutls), and if I want to have ssl support I have t
> > Yes. Paludis is Exherbo's package manager.
> FWIW, I categorized that as "Gentoo based"... tho how much it has expanded
> beyond that by now isn't something I'd know without being told...
It has never been Gentoo-based, Duncan. You might perceive it like that
because Gentoo has often embraced
Wulf C. Krueger posted on Sun, 28 Mar 2010 16:55:12 +0200 as excerpted:
>> And paludis and friends, while being designed for more independent use
>> (much like openrc), again, is it (are they) actually part of any non-
>> Gentoo-based distribution?
>
> Yes. Paludis is Exherbo's package manager.
On Sunday 28 of March 2010 09:39:18 Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > It's really freaking silly to wait months for stabilization of some
> > random php/perl library that's known to work.
> How do you know it works if you don't test on the arch in question?
The problem is not waiting for some to go
st
> And paludis and friends, while being designed for more independent use
> (much like openrc), again, is it (are they) actually part of any non-
> Gentoo-based distribution?
Yes. Paludis is Exherbo's package manager.
Best regards, Wulf
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed messa
On 03/28/2010 10:27 AM, Duncan wrote:
The point being, perhaps I'm wrong and openrc does have a broader
distribution basis than I'm aware of, but in practice, it seems all of
these tend to be used /almost/ exclusively with Gentoo and Gentoo based
distributions. If openrc's usage is rather wider
Alistair Bush posted on Sun, 28 Mar 2010 23:21:23 +1300 as excerpted:
>> So you mention openrc, but don't have it on the list?
>>
>>
> Yes because openrc isn't really gentoo-specific. I don't want the list
> blowing out to include ever package in the entire tree. ie. Thanking
> gcc for cont
On 03/28/2010 06:04 AM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
Basically you are saying that NONE tested that package on the arch until
the stablerequest. That's quite wrong and it should mean that the arch
should be ~ only, since they are stabling packages that they first
tested the day they stable them.
Well
On 03/28/2010 09:27 AM, Brian Harring wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 01:03:43AM -0500, Doug Goldstein wrote:
>> I seriously hate changing USE flags for the sake of changing use
>> flags. This provides a moderate amount of annoyance for anyone that
>> maintains more then one Gentoo box because the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 28.03.2010 10:30, schrieb Luis Francisco Araujo:
> himerge
Hey :P - you are a gentoo dev :P
I think probably most of the app-portage category falls in here (as
portage is the only "gentoo-specific" thing one can develop stuff for):
eix, etc-propo
>
> So you mention openrc, but don't have it on the list?
>
Yes because openrc isn't really gentoo-specific. I don't want the list
blowing out to include ever package in the entire tree. ie. Thanking gcc for
contributing to gentoo.
Note this doesn't mean that openrc won't be on the list.
Brian Harring posted on Sat, 27 Mar 2010 23:34:43 -0700 as excerpted:
> On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 07:31:10PM +1300, Alistair Bush wrote:
>> > On Saturday 27 of March 2010 21:58:41 William Hubbs wrote:
>> >
>> > It's really freaking silly to wait months for stabilization of some
>> > random php/perl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dne 28.3.2010 09:39, Ciaran McCreesh napsal(a):
> On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 07:47:27 +0200
> Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
>> No, seriously - given the fact that some of my packages were even
>> stabilized without contacting me (app-misc/hal-cups-utils,
>> app-ad
Alistair Bush posted on Sun, 28 Mar 2010 17:13:14 +1300 as excerpted:
> I was just thinking how nice it could be if we acknowledged some of the
> projects that contribute to gentoo but are actually developed primarily
> outside of gentoo's dev community. How about a page on gentoo.org
>
> So let
Alistair Bush wrote:
> I was just thinking how nice it could be if we acknowledged some of the
> projects that contribute to gentoo but are actually developed primarily
> outside of gentoo's dev community. How about a page on gentoo.org
>
> So lets me start with a couple of obvious ones.
>
> k
On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 07:47:27 +0200
Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
> No, seriously - given the fact that some of my packages were even
> stabilized without contacting me (app-misc/hal-cups-utils,
> app-admin/system-config- printer-common) - I think it should be:
Well you'd marked them "~arch", right? Tha
22 matches
Mail list logo
