On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 20:22:47 + (UTC), "Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar
Arahesis (arfrever)" wrote:
>
> SRC_URI="http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/${MY_PN:0:1}/${MY_PN}/${MY_P}.tar.gz";
>
This is a perfect example of "over-complexification" - Why didn't you
just use "D" instead of "${MY_PN:0
# Markos Chandras (03 Aug 2010)
# Uses old portmap, installs
# static library but not the header files. Last
# release on 2007. Bug #280933
# Masked for removal in 30 days
mail-client/drac
--
Markos Chandras (hwoarang)
Gentoo Linux Developer
Web: http://hwoarang.silverarrow.org
Key ID: 441AC410
On 08/03/2010 03:03 PM, Peter Volkov wrote:
> Hi.
>
> How should we version our packages in case we've backported upstream
> patches from stable branch of development?
PV reflects the status of upstream that we base the ebuild on (usually a
release) and then we apply individual reviewed patches
On 07/31/2010 05:09 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> On 7/31/10 4:37 AM, Hanno Böck wrote:
>> vpx for supporting googles vp8 codec used in webm.
No, vpx is for using libvpx.
>> At the moment this is only mplayer and ffmpeg, but it's pretty obvious that
>> apps supporting vp8 will start popping u
Hi.
How should we version our packages in case we've backported upstream
patches from stable branch of development? Bug 330667 requests _p or
_pre. I feel that _p|_pre versions should be left for VCS (read
development) versions of the package, while during backports we have the
best version with a
Sending to herd since pacho reported afk for august.
Le lundi 21 juin 2010 à 18:48 +, Pacho Ramos (pacho) a écrit :
> pacho 10/06/21 18:48:06
>
> Modified: ChangeLog metadata.xml
> Added:nautilus-sendto-2.28.4-r1.ebuild
> Log:
> Revision bump with ups
On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 23:55:07 +0200
Matti Bickel wrote:
> > No, you can't make global scope changes just in an EAPI without
> > screwing up user systems. You have to do the whole "wait several
> > years" thing for them.
>
> Bad. So I guess it's back to ferring's "use a new directory not
> readable
On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 23:47:01 +0200
Matti Bickel wrote:
> What can you do with eblits you can't do with elibs?
Define certain arbitrarily selected things that are legal in ebuilds
and eclasses but not elibs.
--
Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
