The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2010-09-26 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
kde-base/kappfinder 2010-09-20 23:55:36 dilfridge
kde-base/kdessh 2010-09-20 23:57:03 dilfridge
kde-base/kma
On Sun, 26 Sep 2010 13:32:49 -0700
Alec Warner wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Mike Frysinger
> wrote:
> > because he's a stupid nub
> > -mike
NO U
>
> Is that pronounced 'nub' or 'noob' ?
>
> Man I should really go to SCALE next year :X
We got the official invite from the organiz
TexLive 2009 already contains achemso-3.0, and we have a separate ebuild for
1.0 ...
# Andreas K. Huettel (26 Sep 2010)
# Masking for removal in 30 days
# This package is obsolete, texlive contains a way newer version
dev-tex/achemso
--
Andreas K. Huettel
Gentoo Linux developer
dilfri...@ge
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Sunday, September 26, 2010 12:57:42 Petteri Räty wrote:
>> On 09/26/2010 07:30 PM, Joshua Saddler wrote:
>> > On Sun, 26 Sep 2010 08:37:35 -0400 Jacob Godserv wrote:
>> >> On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 14:32:49 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> >>> ma
On Sunday, September 26, 2010 12:57:42 Petteri Räty wrote:
> On 09/26/2010 07:30 PM, Joshua Saddler wrote:
> > On Sun, 26 Sep 2010 08:37:35 -0400 Jacob Godserv wrote:
> >> On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 14:32:49 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >>> man, fix your line length. what a nub you are.
> >>
> >> Or ad
On 09/20/2010 12:00 AM, Duncan wrote:
> Given that no set eapi is taken to be eapi=0, and this is proposed as part
> of a new eapi, eapi MUST be set before pkg-inherit, if pkg-inherit and
> thus per-pkg eclasses are to be used at all. The last sentence of the top
> paragraph (of the two) should
Hi Alexis,
> you did it the correct way but that's what happens when you're alone in a
> team and are moving without reliable internet connection then emails &
> other stuff start to pile up :/
I'm sorry, I did not want to be pushy in any way... :|
> > * dev-tex/achemso(-1.0) should be masked
Hi,
On Thursday 23 September 2010 14:22:10 Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> See below... I never got a response from t...@g.o - who else could I talk
> to? TIA, cheers, Andreas
you did it the correct way but that's what happens when you're alone in a team
and are moving without reliable internet con
On 08/16/2010 08:45 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
>> Le lundi 16 août 2010 à 16:07 +0400, Peter Volkov a écrit :
>>> This was discussed many times here and since every time we had same
>>> consensus the policy is in place. It's just not w
On 09/26/2010 07:30 PM, Joshua Saddler wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Sep 2010 08:37:35 -0400
> Jacob Godserv wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 14:32:49 -0400
>> Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>
>>> man, fix your line length. what a nub you are.
>>
>> Or adjust your mail client. Then you could save yourself the nam
On 08/31/2010 11:03 AM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> How about this as an idea:
> 1. Include a parsaable return date I suggest ("Returning:/MM/DD",
> "Returning:Unknown")
> 2. Automated emails when:
> 2.1. It's after the return date (weekly).
> 2.2. You start committing again.
Sounds good:
https:
On Sun, 26 Sep 2010 08:37:35 -0400
Jacob Godserv wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 14:32:49 -0400
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
>
> > man, fix your line length. what a nub you are.
>
> Or adjust your mail client. Then you could save yourself the name
> calling, which changes the mood of the mailing list
On Sun, 26 Sep 2010 16:59:22 +0200
Matti Bickel wrote:
> On 09/26/2010 03:22 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > Isn't the amount of work to get per-package eclasses basically the
> > same as the amount of work to get per-(package and category)
> > eclasses?
>
> Actually, I don't know. Tell me. I've n
On 09/26/2010 03:22 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> Isn't the amount of work to get per-package eclasses basically the same
> as the amount of work to get per-(package and category) eclasses?
Actually, I don't know. Tell me. I've no clue how much PM implementation
effort this will be, yet.
signat
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 6:07 PM, Jacob Godserv wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 14:32:49 -0400
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
>
>> man, fix your line length. what a nub you are.
>
> Or adjust your mail client. Then you could save yourself the name
> calling, which changes the mood of the mailing list and c
On Sun, 26 Sep 2010 15:07:33 +0200
Matti Bickel wrote:
> On 09/19/2010 10:49 PM, Andreas K. Huettel
> > Wouldn't it also make sense to have "per-category eclasses"? This
> > seems much more useful for me.
>
> Yes, probably. But it'll be enough getting per-package eclasses in,
> right now. I'll r
On 09/19/2010 10:49 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
>
> Wouldn't it also make sense to have "per-category eclasses"? This
> seems much more useful for me.
Yes, probably. But it'll be enough getting per-package eclasses in,
right now. I'll revisit this when we finally merge dev-php5 and dev-php.
If
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 14:32:49 -0400
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> man, fix your line length. what a nub you are.
Or adjust your mail client. Then you could save yourself the name
calling, which changes the mood of the mailing list and causes issues
for more people than just your target.
--
Jacob
18 matches
Mail list logo
