On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 04:37:48PM -0500, Jeremy Olexa wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 22:33:17 +0100, Markos Chandras wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > This is getting worse and worse lately. Users tend to CC arches on
> > various bugs based on their architecture. Is it possible to restrict
> > this
> > kind o
On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 22:33:17 +0100, Markos Chandras wrote:
Hi
This is getting worse and worse lately. Users tend to CC arches on
various bugs based on their architecture. Is it possible to restrict
this
kind of option to normal users? Either hide the entire box or disable
the CC button I don't
Hi
This is getting worse and worse lately. Users tend to CC arches on
various bugs based on their architecture. Is it possible to restrict this
kind of option to normal users? Either hide the entire box or disable
the CC button I don't know. It is just get really annoying to see so
many irrelevant
> On Tue, 19 Oct 2010, Robin H Johnson wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 09:26:13PM +0200, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
>> since this is my first "license addition", I rather err on the side
>> of caution. See the pasted text below, are there any objections
>> against adding it and the correspondi
Hi all,
since this is my first "license addition", I rather err on the side of
caution. See the pasted text below, are there any objections against adding it
and the corresponding package to the tree?
Best, Andreas
PS. The files have been grabbed from the kernel-firmware git repository on
k
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 09:26:13PM +0200, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> since this is my first "license addition", I rather err on the side of
> caution. See the pasted text below, are there any objections against adding
> it
> and the corresponding package to the tree?
+1 from me.
Add it to the B
Hi,
"Peter Volkov (pva)" :
> pva 10/10/19 14:35:39
>
> Modified: metadata.xml ChangeLog
> Added:cdemu-1.3.0.ebuild
> Log:
> Version bump. Added nocdemud USE flag to avoid cdemud dependency
> #315491 wrt Michał Górny.
> (Portage version: 2.1.9.18/cvs