* Samuli Suominen :
> So I think your own chance is to contact aballier, ask if he still has
> access (or ask for renewed opinion for the killing)
That was the intention. I cc'ed the bsd team and am still expecting a
reply.
I will move the sparc-bsd and amd-bsd profiles to "exp" in one week.
I su
On 02/10/2011 11:03 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> On Thursday 10 February 2011 21:49:53 Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
>> Il giorno gio, 10/02/2011 alle 14.08 -0600, Ryan Hill ha scritto:
>>> Hey, here's an idea. Before you go making big masks like this for
>>> packages
>>> several people depend on,
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Ryan Hill wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 21:49:53 +0100
> Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
>
>> Il giorno gio, 10/02/2011 alle 14.08 -0600, Ryan Hill ha scritto:
>> > Hey, here's an idea. Before you go making big masks like this for
>> > packages
>> > several people depen
On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 21:49:53 +0100
Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> Il giorno gio, 10/02/2011 alle 14.08 -0600, Ryan Hill ha scritto:
> > Hey, here's an idea. Before you go making big masks like this for
> > packages
> > several people depend on, maybe try looking for a maintainer.
>
> That is *exa
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 6:44 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> Yes, I would definitely be interested in having some spare vms to run
> some automated tests etc. Probably other QA member would be interested
> as well
I'd be really interested in something that ends up as a howto on
automated testing / t
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 04:44:10PM -0800, Tim Harder wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Is anyone interested in getting some type of automated Gentoo testing
> framework setup on the new Supercell infrastructure [1] at the OSUOSL?
> In a nutshell, Supercell allows projects to spin up their own VMs on
> demand u
Il giorno gio, 10/02/2011 alle 22.03 +0100, Andreas K. Huettel ha
scritto:
> Hey come on. If you really wanted to find a maintainer, you'd have
> given me
> the time to check back with upstream instead of just refusing a
> revert.
You get to maintain (and unmask) the package *after* it's fixed.
On Thursday 10 February 2011 21:49:53 Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> Il giorno gio, 10/02/2011 alle 14.08 -0600, Ryan Hill ha scritto:
> > Hey, here's an idea. Before you go making big masks like this for
> > packages
> > several people depend on, maybe try looking for a maintainer.
>
> That is *exa
Il giorno gio, 10/02/2011 alle 14.08 -0600, Ryan Hill ha scritto:
> Hey, here's an idea. Before you go making big masks like this for
> packages
> several people depend on, maybe try looking for a maintainer.
That is *exactly* what these masks are. And you should know there is
*no* "five minutes
On 02/10/11 21:09, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> On 02/10/2011 10:01 PM, Krzysztof Pawlik wrote:
>> I don't exactly see how what you've written is of any relevance to the main
>> point of this - the original issue was *extremely* simple: whenever
>> maintainer's
>> (active, inactive, last maintainer, w
On 02/10/2011 10:01 PM, Krzysztof Pawlik wrote:
> I don't exactly see how what you've written is of any relevance to the main
> point of this - the original issue was *extremely* simple: whenever
> maintainer's
> (active, inactive, last maintainer, whatever) ACK should be mentioned in the
> messag
On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 17:23:08 +0200
Samuli Suominen wrote:
> # Samuli Suominen (10 Feb 2011)
> # Unmaintained and completely broken wrt bugs
> # 185475, 211262, 247268, 276220, 287751, 293501, 298109,
> # 301729, 308801, 311763, 311765, 328691, 340605, 348483,
> # 352506, 237366, 250054
> # Remov
On 02/10/11 20:36, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> Il giorno gio, 10/02/2011 alle 19.44 +0100, Krzysztof Pawlik ha scritto:
>>
>> I don't agree with that - QA doesn't give anyone a silver bullet for
>> killing
>> whatever you want (or whatever you think should die). Maintainer must
>> be
>> *always* no
Il giorno gio, 10/02/2011 alle 19.44 +0100, Krzysztof Pawlik ha scritto:
>
> I don't agree with that - QA doesn't give anyone a silver bullet for
> killing
> whatever you want (or whatever you think should die). Maintainer must
> be
> *always* notified/pinged/mailed/im'ed/phoned/poked when his pac
On 02/10/11 19:02, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
>> Sorry but it really matters very little whether maintainer acks at all, *if
>> the package fails to build*.
I don't agree with that - QA doesn't give anyone a silver bullet for killing
whatever you want (or whatever you think should die). Maintainer
> Sorry but it really matters very little whether maintainer acks at all,
> *if the package fails to build*.
>
> We're not talking about a single problem with a single package.
Yes, you are completely right regarding the ebuilds.
I do not dispute at all that masking them is a correct way of actio
Il giorno gio, 10/02/2011 alle 18.00 +0100, Andreas K. Huettel ha
scritto:
>
> Guys you have a communication problem. Even though you are QA and can
> do whatever you want it would probably help your public image if you
> just add to the original e-mail "acked by peper" / "acked by
> maintainer"..
On Thursday 10 February 2011 17:40:07 Samuli Suominen wrote:
> On 02/10/2011 06:30 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
>
> > Samuli, I'll revert the mask tonight for the moment (removing and then soon
> > re-adding makes no sense), until I know more. If the project remains as
> > sluggish as it is now,
On 02/10/2011 06:30 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
>
> Sigh.
>
> After talking to peper, I've been trying to get it running with snapshots
> recently (in my overlay), with mixed success.
>
> Does anyone here know anything about the 0.40 release - will it be before or
> after Duke Nukem? (No co
Sigh.
After talking to peper, I've been trying to get it running with snapshots
recently (in my overlay), with mixed success.
Does anyone here know anything about the 0.40 release - will it be before or
after Duke Nukem? (No commits so far since I was waiting for any information
about that.)
On 21:18 Wed 09 Feb , Fabian Groffen wrote:
> This is a post-FOSDEM call for people with interest for a Gentoo
> text-based installer.
>
> If you are a developer, or Gentoo user, and feel like spending some time
> on (possibly) creating a text-based installer for Gentoo in cooperation
> with o
# Samuli Suominen (10 Feb 2011)
# Unmaintained and completely broken wrt bugs
# 185475, 211262, 247268, 276220, 287751, 293501, 298109,
# 301729, 308801, 311763, 311765, 328691, 340605, 348483,
# 352506, 237366, 250054
# Removal in 30 days
app-pda/barry
app-pda/libopensync
app-pda/libopensync-plug
Fabian Groffen posted on Thu, 10 Feb 2011 10:39:39 +0100 as excerpted:
> On 10-02-2011 07:54:16 +0100, Fabio Erculiani wrote:
>> The only way to avoid epic failures is to keep the whole thing simple,
>> without trying to fit everybody. An installer that would cover a
>> standard install, newbie-or
Konstantin Tokarev dixit (2011-02-10, 13:01):
>
>
> 10.02.2011, 12:56, "Antoni Grzymala" :
> > Fabian Groffen dixit (2011-02-10, 10:39):
> >
> >> On 10-02-2011 07:54:16 +0100, Fabio Erculiani wrote:
> >>> The only way to avoid epic failures is to keep the whole thing simple,
> >>> without try
10.02.2011, 12:56, "Antoni Grzymala" :
> Fabian Groffen dixit (2011-02-10, 10:39):
>
>> On 10-02-2011 07:54:16 +0100, Fabio Erculiani wrote:
>>> The only way to avoid epic failures is to keep the whole thing simple,
>>> without trying to fit everybody. An installer that would cover a
>>> stan
Fabian Groffen dixit (2011-02-10, 10:39):
> On 10-02-2011 07:54:16 +0100, Fabio Erculiani wrote:
> > The only way to avoid epic failures is to keep the whole thing simple,
> > without trying to fit everybody. An installer that would cover a
> > standard install, newbie-oriented scenario would be d
On 10-02-2011 07:54:16 +0100, Fabio Erculiani wrote:
> The only way to avoid epic failures is to keep the whole thing simple,
> without trying to fit everybody. An installer that would cover a
> standard install, newbie-oriented scenario would be definitely good.
> Experienced people won't use it a
27 matches
Mail list logo
