[gentoo-dev] About merging mms and libmms USE flags

2011-07-06 Thread Pacho Ramos
Currently, six packages are using mms and libmms for similar usages: media-libs/libmediainfo:libmms - Support for Microsoft Media Server (MMS) streams via libmms media-plugins/audacious-plugins:mms - Build with mms (Microsoft Media Server) support media-sound/mpd:libmms - Support for Microsoft

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-misc/aria2: aria2-1.12.0.ebuild ChangeLog

2011-07-06 Thread Todd Goodman
* Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org [110705 19:01]: On Tuesday, July 05, 2011 19:05:23 Francesco R wrote: rm -f chuck norris rm: cannot remove `Chuck Norris': Operation not contemplated chuck norris != Chuck Norris -mike If he had said Chuck Norris instead of chuck norris he wouldn' t

[gentoo-dev] Lastrite www-plugins/moonlight (from masked for broken to masked for removal)

2011-07-06 Thread Samuli Suominen
+# Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org (06 Jul 2011) +# Fails to build with current mono wrt #340375 +# Needs a maintainer and a bump wrt #370049 +# The package was masked with different message for 6+ months +# prior to this, so removal in about 7 days. +www-plugins/moonlight -# Pacho Ramos

[gentoo-dev] keywording of new style virtuals

2011-07-06 Thread William Hubbs
All, from my previous discussion, I am about to put a new virtual in the tree. Do I need to use the same ~arch/30 day wait/stabilize cycle I would normally use even though the default package the virtual will bring in is stable everywhere? I'm thinking I can take the virtual straight to stable

Re: [gentoo-dev] keywording of new style virtuals

2011-07-06 Thread Petteri Räty
On 06.07.2011 21:55, William Hubbs wrote: All, from my previous discussion, I am about to put a new virtual in the tree. Do I need to use the same ~arch/30 day wait/stabilize cycle I would normally use even though the default package the virtual will bring in is stable everywhere? I'm

Re: [gentoo-dev] keywording of new style virtuals

2011-07-06 Thread William Hubbs
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 10:17:28PM +0300, Petteri Räty wrote: On 06.07.2011 21:55, William Hubbs wrote: All, from my previous discussion, I am about to put a new virtual in the tree. Do I need to use the same ~arch/30 day wait/stabilize cycle I would normally use even though the

Re: [gentoo-dev] keywording of new style virtuals

2011-07-06 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 07/06/2011 09:55 PM, William Hubbs wrote: All, from my previous discussion, I am about to put a new virtual in the tree. Do I need to use the same ~arch/30 day wait/stabilize cycle I would normally use even though the default package the virtual will bring in is stable everywhere? I'm

Re: [gentoo-dev] keywording of new style virtuals

2011-07-06 Thread Petteri Räty
On 06.07.2011 22:45, William Hubbs wrote: On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 10:17:28PM +0300, Petteri Räty wrote: On 06.07.2011 21:55, William Hubbs wrote: All, from my previous discussion, I am about to put a new virtual in the tree. Do I need to use the same ~arch/30 day wait/stabilize cycle I

Re: [gentoo-dev] keywording of new style virtuals

2011-07-06 Thread Ulrich Mueller
On Wed, 6 Jul 2011, William Hubbs wrote: from my previous discussion, I am about to put a new virtual in the tree. Do I need to use the same ~arch/30 day wait/stabilize cycle I would normally use even though the default package the virtual will bring in is stable everywhere? I'm thinking I

Re: [gentoo-dev] About merging mms and libmms USE flags

2011-07-06 Thread Tim Harder
On 2011-07-06 Wed 03:24, Pacho Ramos wrote: Maybe they should be merged on a unique USE flag (probably mms as it's usually more recognizable due being needed when trying to play mms:// streams) and, probably, converted to a global USE flag. What do you think? As the current, primary