Currently, six packages are using mms and libmms for similar usages:
media-libs/libmediainfo:libmms - Support for Microsoft Media Server
(MMS) streams via libmms
media-plugins/audacious-plugins:mms - Build with mms (Microsoft Media
Server) support
media-sound/mpd:libmms - Support for Microsoft
* Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org [110705 19:01]:
On Tuesday, July 05, 2011 19:05:23 Francesco R wrote:
rm -f chuck norris
rm: cannot remove `Chuck Norris': Operation not contemplated
chuck norris != Chuck Norris
-mike
If he had said Chuck Norris instead of chuck norris he wouldn'
t
+# Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org (06 Jul 2011)
+# Fails to build with current mono wrt #340375
+# Needs a maintainer and a bump wrt #370049
+# The package was masked with different message for 6+ months
+# prior to this, so removal in about 7 days.
+www-plugins/moonlight
-# Pacho Ramos
All,
from my previous discussion, I am about to put a new virtual in the
tree. Do I need to use the same ~arch/30 day wait/stabilize cycle I
would normally use even though the default package the virtual will
bring in is stable everywhere?
I'm thinking I can take the virtual straight to stable
On 06.07.2011 21:55, William Hubbs wrote:
All,
from my previous discussion, I am about to put a new virtual in the
tree. Do I need to use the same ~arch/30 day wait/stabilize cycle I
would normally use even though the default package the virtual will
bring in is stable everywhere?
I'm
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 10:17:28PM +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
On 06.07.2011 21:55, William Hubbs wrote:
All,
from my previous discussion, I am about to put a new virtual in the
tree. Do I need to use the same ~arch/30 day wait/stabilize cycle I
would normally use even though the
On 07/06/2011 09:55 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
All,
from my previous discussion, I am about to put a new virtual in the
tree. Do I need to use the same ~arch/30 day wait/stabilize cycle I
would normally use even though the default package the virtual will
bring in is stable everywhere?
I'm
On 06.07.2011 22:45, William Hubbs wrote:
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 10:17:28PM +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
On 06.07.2011 21:55, William Hubbs wrote:
All,
from my previous discussion, I am about to put a new virtual in the
tree. Do I need to use the same ~arch/30 day wait/stabilize cycle I
On Wed, 6 Jul 2011, William Hubbs wrote:
from my previous discussion, I am about to put a new virtual in the
tree. Do I need to use the same ~arch/30 day wait/stabilize cycle I
would normally use even though the default package the virtual will
bring in is stable everywhere?
I'm thinking I
On 2011-07-06 Wed 03:24, Pacho Ramos wrote:
Maybe they should be merged on a unique USE flag (probably mms as it's
usually more recognizable due being needed when trying to play mms://
streams) and, probably, converted to a global USE flag.
What do you think?
As the current, primary
10 matches
Mail list logo