2011/7/22 Stanislav Ochotnicky :
> Hello fellow devs,
>
> some of you know that our commit statistics at Ohloh[1] have been
> outdated because they were not able to process our huge CVS tree for
> some reason :-)
>
> One way or the other I managed to reuse robbat2's previous work on
> cvs->git conv
2011/7/22 Stanislav Ochotnicky :
> Hello fellow devs,
>
> some of you know that our commit statistics at Ohloh[1] have been
> outdated because they were not able to process our huge CVS tree for
> some reason :-)
>
> One way or the other I managed to reuse robbat2's previous work on
> cvs->git conv
Hello fellow devs,
some of you know that our commit statistics at Ohloh[1] have been
outdated because they were not able to process our huge CVS tree for
some reason :-)
One way or the other I managed to reuse robbat2's previous work on
cvs->git conversion and keep our experimental conversion re
* Alex Alexander schrieb am 22.07.11 um 13:30 Uhr:
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 14:21, Marc Schiffbauer wrote:
> > Am Freitag, 22. Juli 2011, 14:50:06 schrieb Maxim Koltsov:
> >> Hi devs,
> >> I'm about to add Leechcraft modular internet client to tree. It has 32
> >> packages and uses it's own eclas
On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 14:57:08 +0400
Maxim Koltsov wrote:
> Sorry, forgot the eclass. Attaching it here...
> P.S. Email of author: 0xd34df...@gmail.com
Then you should CC him (like I did now).
> # Original author: 0xd34df00d <0xd34df...@gmail.com> and
> #Andrian No
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 11:08 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> Due dragonheart retirement the following packages need a new maintainer:
> dev-python/pyspf
> dev-python/python-lzo
Python team will take these two.
Best regards,
--
Jesus Rivero (Neurogeek)
Gentoo Developer
2011/7/22 Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn :
> But I do think it is
> good to have live ebuilds in portage, especially for fast moving
> applications.
I think they can be useful for any application as long as they're
maintained. I can see the value of the QA policy that they must be
masked, but I don
Maxim Koltsov schrieb:
> Also i'd want to ask: is it woth to add new category (e.g.
> leechcraft-plugins) to simplify managing leechcraft ebuilds. And the
> last question: is it good to add versions for all ebuilds too?
>
I don't think there is a need for a new category. But I do think it
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 14:21, Marc Schiffbauer wrote:
> Am Freitag, 22. Juli 2011, 14:50:06 schrieb Maxim Koltsov:
>> Hi devs,
>> I'm about to add Leechcraft modular internet client to tree. It has 32
>> packages and uses it's own eclass. Please review it and allow me to
>> commit it to the tree.
Am Freitag, 22. Juli 2011, 14:50:06 schrieb Maxim Koltsov:
> Hi devs,
> I'm about to add Leechcraft modular internet client to tree. It has 32
> packages and uses it's own eclass. Please review it and allow me to
> commit it to the tree.
> Also i'd want to ask: is it woth to add new category (e.g.
Sorry, forgot the eclass. Attaching it here...
P.S. Email of author: 0xd34df...@gmail.com
leechcraft.eclass
Description: Binary data
Hi devs,
I'm about to add Leechcraft modular internet client to tree. It has 32
packages and uses it's own eclass. Please review it and allow me to
commit it to the tree.
Also i'd want to ask: is it woth to add new category (e.g.
leechcraft-plugins) to simplify managing leechcraft ebuilds. And the
12 matches
Mail list logo
