On 18:04 Thu 22 Sep , Alec Warner wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> > I do, because I don't have time to deal with other people breaking
> > my packages, whether they're in gentoo-x86, the science overlay, or
> > my personal one. I've got more important thing
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> On 09:37 Wed 21 Sep , Alec Warner wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 6:11 AM, Donnie Berkholz
>> wrote:
>> > Not really, because when you update a bundled lib you actually make
>> > your whole app compile with it. People change the API
On 09:37 Wed 21 Sep , Alec Warner wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 6:11 AM, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> > Not really, because when you update a bundled lib you actually make
> > your whole app compile with it. People change the APIs of eclasses
> > and then just let every internal consumer (ebu
+# Michael Sterrett (22 Sep 2011)
+# Doesn't work and upstream has gone away.
+# Masked for removal on 20111022
+# See bug #382831
+games-action/dungeon
On Thursday, September 22, 2011 14:23:55 Tim Harder wrote:
> On 2011-09-22 Thu 01:53, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > In the course of the old-style to new-style transition of virtuals,
> > I had taken maintainership of several new-style virtual packages.
> >
> > After several months have passed without
On 2011-09-22 Thu 01:53, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> In the course of the old-style to new-style transition of virtuals,
> I had taken maintainership of several new-style virtual packages.
> After several months have passed without any bugs showing up, I
> believe it's time that I drop maintainership
On 16:41 Thu 22 Sep , Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> Am Donnerstag 22 September 2011, 13:27:47 schrieb Michał Górny:
> > > >
> > > > The style change was approved by Donnie already.
> > >
> > > You mean that Donnie agreed with the style change. It's not up to any
> > > individual developer to "a
Am Donnerstag 22 September 2011, 13:27:47 schrieb Michał Górny:
> > >
> > > The style change was approved by Donnie already.
> >
> > You mean that Donnie agreed with the style change. It's not up to any
> > individual developer to "approve" such a change for the entire tree.
>
> What kind of 'en
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 10:58:28 +
"Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto" wrote:
> On 22-09-2011 08:11, Michał Górny wrote:
> > On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 09:01:17 +0200 Ulrich Mueller
> > wrote:
> >
> >>> Attaching fixed version of the last two patches, and a
> >>> complete eclass for convenience.
> >>
> >> J
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 22-09-2011 08:11, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 09:01:17 +0200 Ulrich Mueller
> wrote:
>
>>> Attaching fixed version of the last two patches, and a
>>> complete eclass for convenience.
>>
>> Just a general comment: Is it really necess
On 09/22/2011 04:53 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>virtual/linux-sources
>
I can take this one if the kernel herd is okay with that.
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened]
E-Mail: bluen...@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : 8040 5A4D 8709 21B1 1A88 33CE 979C AF40 D045 5535
GnuPG I
Hi,
In the course of the old-style to new-style transition of virtuals,
I had taken maintainership of several new-style virtual packages.
After several months have passed without any bugs showing up, I
believe it's time that I drop maintainership of these:
virtual/cron
virtual/dev-manager
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 09:01:17 +0200
Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > Attaching fixed version of the last two patches, and a complete
> > eclass for convenience.
>
> Just a general comment: Is it really necessary to change all
> [[ -n ${foo} ]] and [[ -z ${foo} ]] conditionals to the more obscure
> [[ ${
On 22-09-2011 09:01:17 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > Attaching fixed version of the last two patches, and a complete
> > eclass for convenience.
>
> Just a general comment: Is it really necessary to change all
> [[ -n ${foo} ]] and [[ -z ${foo} ]] conditionals to the more obscure
> [[ ${foo} ]]
Excerpts from Mike Frysinger's message of 2011-09-19 18:05:39 +0200:
> On Monday, September 19, 2011 11:35:09 Michał Górny wrote:
> > On Mon, 19 Sep 2011 11:11:31 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > > > by that token, i'll go ahead and remove glibc's static
> > > > > libraries since upstream doesn't
> Attaching fixed version of the last two patches, and a complete
> eclass for convenience.
Just a general comment: Is it really necessary to change all
[[ -n ${foo} ]] and [[ -z ${foo} ]] conditionals to the more obscure
[[ ${foo} ]] and [[ ! ${foo} ]]?
The shortest possible form is not always t
16 matches
Mail list logo
