Re: [gentoo-dev] making the stable tree more up-to-date

2011-11-25 Thread Mr. Aaron W. Swenson
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 05:39:32PM +0100, Thomas Kahle wrote: On 09:41 Mon 21 Nov 2011, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote: I think that with recent advancements in batch-stabilization we're able to process a much higher amount of stabilization bugs, and keep the bug queue low. It used to be longer

Re: [gentoo-dev] restricting phases where enew{user,group} is allowed

2011-11-25 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Wednesday 23 November 2011 19:31:11 Mike Frysinger wrote: currently we blacklist certain phases (which is largely based on EAPI=0 and blocking src_*) for enew{user,group}. moving forward, ferringb suggested we invert this into a whitelist of allowed phases. afaict, the blacklisting + dev

[gentoo-dev] RFC: Gentoo News file about GNOME 3.2's unmasking

2011-11-25 Thread Nirbheek Chauhan
Hello folks, Attached is a short news file announcing the unmasking of GNOME 3.2 with a link to the upgrade guide. Since GNOME 3 is already in the tree, and the news file content is straightforward, I'd like to commit this in 24hrs if there are no problems. It can also be found here: