Hello,
I'd like to add a new eclass for www-client/netsurf related ebuilds and
seek your review and approval. I'll add it in two days, if unchallenged.
=== Motivation ===
The browser projects started out as a stray set of components [1], some
without releases.
In the meantime, all stuff is
Dnia 2013-06-19, o godz. 14:09:26
Michael Weber x...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
- multilib builds and rename non-DEFAULT_ABI $bins to $bin.${ABI}
And why exactly do you need multilib for a web browser?
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 06/19/2013 02:16 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2013-06-19, o godz. 14:09:26
Michael Weber x...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
- multilib builds and rename non-DEFAULT_ABI $bins to $bin.${ABI}
And why exactly do you need multilib for a web browser?
No need for the browser package (just fun)
Michael Weber schrieb:
On 06/19/2013 02:16 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2013-06-19, o godz. 14:09:26
Michael Weber x...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
- multilib builds and rename non-DEFAULT_ABI $bins to $bin.${ABI}
And why exactly do you need multilib for a web browser?
No need for the
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 8:30 AM, Michael Weber x...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 06/19/2013 02:16 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2013-06-19, o godz. 14:09:26
Michael Weber x...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
- multilib builds and rename non-DEFAULT_ABI $bins to $bin.${ABI}
And why exactly do you need
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
It is unfortunate to observe constant bullying, insults and trolling
across our public media. Developers have been warned over and over that
such behaviour is not acceptable and they should try to behave
properly. However, people have ignored
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 06:35:49PM +0100, Markos Chandras wrote:
For me, this problem is critical. Devrel is working on formalizing a new
policy, and we will announce news on this soon. In the meantime, to
prevent further escalations, I will use my lead powers to request
immediate bans
on Wed, 19 Jun 2013, at 10:35, Markos Chandras thusly quipped:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
It is unfortunate to observe constant bullying, insults and trolling
across our public media. Developers have been warned over and over that
such behaviour is not acceptable
Gentoo developers have been resigning from the project because they got burned
out by dealing with ad-hominems, insults, and flames. I do not see CoC
enforcement as some sort of plot to enforce groupthink or silence debate, but
as an attempt to fix the real problem of burnout and talent drain.
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 03:43:41PM -0400, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
Gentoo developers have been resigning from the project because they got
burned out by dealing with ad-hominems, insults, and flames. I do not see CoC
enforcement as some sort of plot to enforce groupthink or silence debate,
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 3:15 PM, g...@malth.us wrote:
Am I the only one who feels that trolling, abuse, and so forth, are largely
in the eye of the beholder, and that lively, impassioned, constructive
debate may seem to many readers like hyperbole and ad hominem attack?
Hence my comment that
On Monday 17 June 2013 16:37:06 Rick Zero_Chaos Farina wrote:
On 06/17/2013 04:19 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
On 17/06/2013 17:54, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina wrote:
I make all my files with tar cJf
zero@ozzie ~ % file /usr/portage/distfiles/gr-osmosdr-0.0.2.tar.xz
On 06/19/2013 09:15 PM, g...@malth.us wrote:
Sorry to hear you have such a low opinion of the socialization of Gentoo
developers. Since I'm not one of them, I'll just put forth my 2c in on
this, without fear of consequences.
Yet even users not behaving will get a friendly warning and might be
Today an interesting thing happened to my repoman, as I was committing a
change:
Creating Manifest for /home/ph/gentoo-x86/dev-lang/v8
gpg: no default secret key: Unusable secret key
gpg: /home/ph/gentoo-x86/dev-lang/v8/Manifest: clearsign failed:
Unusable secret key
!!! !!! gpg exited with '2'
On 06/19/2013 07:59 PM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
I was surprised by repoman just dropping FEATURES=sign . I'm aware
that at that time it has to commit an updated Manifest to prevent
breakages, so if gpg fails it proceeds, but is there something it could
do to check gpg sanity before committing
On 06/19/2013 08:25 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
On 06/19/2013 07:59 PM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
I was surprised by repoman just dropping FEATURES=sign . I'm aware
that at that time it has to commit an updated Manifest to prevent
breakages, so if gpg fails it proceeds, but is there something it
Does this mean the QA lead finally gets to suspend people who are patently
not suited for developing a stable distribution without asking devrel?
Because last time we got into the same judge, jury, and executioner
argument, which I guess was just sent for the gallows (pun intended).
Mind, it's
17 matches
Mail list logo
