Hello,
I've updated the autodep and testing it now.
I've fixed a problem with the integration of autodep in the newest version
of Portage, but I think I did it in a hackish way. I want to ask if it is
possble to solve it better.
First, some words about the architecture of autodep. Autodep
Hi,
I don't use the listed packages anymore so feel free to take those:
net-analyzer/mk-livestatus
net-misc/igmpproxy
x11-misc/tint2
x11-misc/tintwizard
net-misc/cfengine - I'll just keep maintaining Cfengine 2.x for now since
we/Infra still use it.
--
Regards,
Christian Ruppert
Gentoo Linux
* Christian Ruppert schrieb am 22.02.14 um 14:57 Uhr:
Hi,
I don't use the listed packages anymore so feel free to take those:
net-analyzer/mk-livestatus
net-misc/igmpproxy
x11-misc/tint2
x11-misc/tintwizard
net-misc/cfengine - I'll just keep maintaining Cfengine 2.x for now since
we/Infra
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 12:06 AM, Tom Wijsman tom...@gentoo.org wrote:
Currently, the MATE overlay has 14 meta-base packages and 16 mate-extra
packages; this might slightly change when reconsidering if their
location is alright, however it is near the average (~15) per category
so that should
On Sat, 22 Feb 2014 17:16:11 +0100
Dirkjan Ochtman d...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 12:06 AM, Tom Wijsman tom...@gentoo.org
wrote:
Currently, the MATE overlay has 14 meta-base packages and 16
mate-extra packages; this might slightly change when reconsidering
if their
Tom Wijsman posted on Sat, 22 Feb 2014 18:08:24 +0100 as excerpted:
That seems a little on the small side? Can we just do a single category
for all of it, instead? People can go bikeshed on the name.
TL;DR: Yes, we could try that; but what would be a consistent name?
mate-desktop ?
(The
On Sat, 22 Feb 2014 17:33:57 + (UTC)
Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
Tom Wijsman posted on Sat, 22 Feb 2014 18:08:24 +0100 as excerpted:
That seems a little on the small side? Can we just do a single
category for all of it, instead? People can go bikeshed on the
name.
TL;DR:
On 02/23/2014 05:02 AM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
On Sat, 22 Feb 2014 17:33:57 + (UTC)
Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
Tom Wijsman posted on Sat, 22 Feb 2014 18:08:24 +0100 as excerpted:
That seems a little on the small side? Can we just do a single
category for all of it, instead? People
On Thu, 20 Feb 2014 11:26:18 +0200
Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
Bye bye distribution level consistency :-(
The last time we had distribution level consistency was the moment between the
first and second packages getting committed to the tree.
--
Ryan Hill
On 2/19/14, 8:05 AM, Roelof Wobben wrote:
Am I right I have to make a local repo to test if it's build.
Yeah, I suggest just using /usr/local/portage and adding it to
PORTDIR_OVERLAY in make.conf.
And does ebuild x.ebuild manifest also builds the package or do I have
to use emerge x for
On Thu, 20 Feb 2014 05:16:55 -0500
Alexandre Rostovtsev tetrom...@gentoo.org wrote:
The other unfortunate aspect of the gtk3 flag is that it encourages
using flags instead of slotting for libraries that can support both gtk
and gtk3, resulting in needless rebuilds of when one of the flags is
On Sat, 2014-02-22 at 14:57 -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
wxGTK not only splits up libraries by version and toolkit, but also by charset
and debug/release. If we had to use different SLOTs rather than USE flags we
would need eight of them for 2.8 alone. And I don't know how we would name
the
On Sat, 22 Feb 2014 16:09:53 -0500
Alexandre Rostovtsev tetrom...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sat, 2014-02-22 at 14:57 -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
wxGTK not only splits up libraries by version and toolkit, but also by
charset and debug/release. If we had to use different SLOTs rather than
USE flags
On Sat, 22 Feb 2014 15:50:17 -0600
Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sat, 22 Feb 2014 16:09:53 -0500
Alexandre Rostovtsev tetrom...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sat, 2014-02-22 at 14:57 -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
wxGTK not only splits up libraries by version and toolkit, but also by
On Sat, 2014-02-22 at 15:59 -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
On Sat, 22 Feb 2014 15:50:17 -0600
Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sat, 22 Feb 2014 16:09:53 -0500
Alexandre Rostovtsev tetrom...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sat, 2014-02-22 at 14:57 -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
wxGTK not only
Am Samstag, 22. Februar 2014, 19:02:54 schrieb Tom Wijsman:
On Sat, 22 Feb 2014 17:33:57 + (UTC)
(Or do we want a consistent 'mate-base' / 'mate-extra' approach?)
If there is a clear distinction between a core set of packages and extra stuff
(as in e.g. kde4), the combination mate-base
On Fri, 21 Feb 2014 16:34:47 -0800
Pavel Kazakov nullishz...@gentoo.org wrote:
---
pym/portage/emaint/main.py| 6 +-
pym/portage/emaint/modules/merges/__init__.py | 19
pym/portage/emaint/modules/merges/merges.py | 121
++
3 files
17 matches
Mail list logo
