Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in x11-plugins/wmfishtime/files: wmfishtime-1.24-gtk.patch

2014-06-22 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 23/06/14 05:01, Jeroen Roovers wrote: > On Sun, 22 Jun 2014 20:08:41 +0300 > Samuli Suominen wrote: > >> LIBS = `$(PKG_CONFIG) gtk+-2.0 --libs` -lm -X11 > No, it should be > > LIBS = $(shell $(PKG_CONFIG) ...) > > or PKG_CONFIG will be called every time LIBS is evaluated. > > And while you're

[gentoo-dev] Re: perl-module.eclass: respect CFLAGS, LDFLAGS - please review

2014-06-22 Thread Duncan
Andreas K. Huettel posted on Sun, 22 Jun 2014 20:13:59 +0200 as excerpted: > Offhand I don't know any way how the eclass could "know" whether a perl > package requires C building or not. Any heuristics would be a hack at > best. It might even be preferable to manually add some variable to 300 > pa

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in x11-plugins/wmfishtime/files: wmfishtime-1.24-gtk.patch

2014-06-22 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Sun, 22 Jun 2014 20:08:41 +0300 Samuli Suominen wrote: > LIBS = `$(PKG_CONFIG) gtk+-2.0 --libs` -lm -X11 No, it should be LIBS = $(shell $(PKG_CONFIG) ...) or PKG_CONFIG will be called every time LIBS is evaluated. And while you're at it, why not call PKG_CONFIG on x11, too? LIBS = $(shel

[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2014-06-22 23h59 UTC

2014-06-22 Thread Robin H. Johnson
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed from the tree, for the week ending 2014-06-22 23h59 UTC. Removals: net-mail/fetchyahoo 2014-06-16 09:00:26 eras app-emacs/redo 2014-06-17 06:15:03 ulm games-e

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: perl-module.eclass: respect CFLAGS, LDFLAGS - please review

2014-06-22 Thread Kent Fredric
On 23 June 2014 07:10, Kent Fredric wrote: > I'd probably go with PERL_C_BINDINGS=yes or PERL_XS=yes or similar. > > Because there's probably other things that we can infer from that property > and use for other things. > > > And its reasonably straight forward to automatically identify things

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: perl-module.eclass: respect CFLAGS, LDFLAGS - please review

2014-06-22 Thread Kent Fredric
On 23 June 2014 06:13, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > > PERL_CFLAGS_HANDLING=yes > inherit perl-module > I'd probably go with PERL_C_BINDINGS=yes or PERL_XS=yes or similar. Because there's probably other things that we can infer from that property and use for other things. And its reasonably

Re: [gentoo-dev] perl-module.eclass: respect CFLAGS, LDFLAGS - please review

2014-06-22 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
Am Sonntag, 22. Juni 2014, 11:54:33 schrieb Michał Górny: > > Also, how about fixing CC and CXX? That's more important to me than > some disrespected CFLAGS :P. Easily doable, I'll come up with an extended patch. > > + --config "lddlflags=-shared ${LDFLAGS}" \ > > Tadaam, you

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: perl-module.eclass: respect CFLAGS, LDFLAGS - please review

2014-06-22 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
Am Sonntag, 22. Juni 2014, 15:31:43 schrieb Rich Freeman: > On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 9:11 AM, Kent Fredric wrote: > > On 23 June 2014 01:02, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > >> The usual conditional for that is USE=custom-cflags or a similar variant [...] > > The problem with a USE flag here

[gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH] qt4-r2.eclass: simplify doc handling

2014-06-22 Thread Davide Pesavento
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 12:43 PM, Sergey Popov wrote: > As we should not do anything crazy with DOCS and HTML_DOCS, let's > simplify our eclass > It's not about doing "anything crazy"... einstalldocs simply didn't exist at the time. Anyway, ACK from me. And please remember to update the qt overl

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in x11-plugins/wmfishtime/files: wmfishtime-1.24-gtk.patch

2014-06-22 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 22/06/14 19:25, Bernard Cafarelli (voyageur) wrote: > voyageur14/06/22 16:25:10 > > Modified: wmfishtime-1.24-gtk.patch > Log: > Link with libm, spotted by patrick in bug #513908 > > (Portage version: 2.2.10/cvs/Linux x86_64, signed Manifest commit with key > C74525F

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: perl-module.eclass: respect CFLAGS, LDFLAGS - please review

2014-06-22 Thread Rich Freeman
On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 9:11 AM, Kent Fredric wrote: > On 23 June 2014 01:02, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: >> >> >> The usual conditional for that is USE=custom-cflags or a similar variant >> like custom-optimization. See the firefox ebuilds, which use both. >> >> $ equery -N u firefox |

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: perl-module.eclass: respect CFLAGS, LDFLAGS - please review

2014-06-22 Thread Kent Fredric
On 23 June 2014 01:02, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > > The usual conditional for that is USE=custom-cflags or a similar variant > like custom-optimization. See the firefox ebuilds, which use both. > > $ equery -N u firefox | grep custom > - - custom-cflags: Build with user-speci

[gentoo-dev] Re: perl-module.eclass: respect CFLAGS, LDFLAGS - please review

2014-06-22 Thread Duncan
Andreas K. Huettel posted on Sun, 22 Jun 2014 11:41:01 +0200 as excerpted: > Also people familiar with Perl have voiced doubts if we should meddle > with the perl-module CFLAGS and LDFLAGS at all, maybe making these > changes conditional on something like I_KNOW_WHAT_I_AM_DOING. Hoping for > comme

Re: [gentoo-dev] perl-module.eclass: respect CFLAGS, LDFLAGS - please review

2014-06-22 Thread Michał Górny
Dnia 2014-06-22, o godz. 11:41:01 "Andreas K. Huettel" napisał(a): > Also people familiar with Perl have voiced doubts if we should meddle with > the > perl-module CFLAGS and LDFLAGS at all, maybe making these changes conditional > on something like I_KNOW_WHAT_I_AM_DOING. Hoping for comments.

[gentoo-dev] perl-module.eclass: respect CFLAGS, LDFLAGS - please review

2014-06-22 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
TL;DR: Please review and test (also in exotic settings, arches, prefix?) the patch below for perl-module.eclass Sending this to the list since perl is pretty deep down in the system, and since I'm not 100% sure of this stuff. Needs review. Also people familiar with Perl have voiced doubts if

Re: [gentoo-dev] Making an overlay publicly available?

2014-06-22 Thread Sergey Popov
21.06.2014 01:17, Norman Rieß пишет: > Am 20.06.2014 23:05, schrieb Jauhien Piatlicki: >> Hi, >> >> I was not able to google instructions, but you need to file a bug, >> something like https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=510028 >> >> Ask on gentoo-infra IRC channel for more information. >> >> I