[gentoo-dev] Re: metadata.xml un-ization, v2

2014-12-10 Thread Michael Palimaka
On 10/12/14 06:35, Luca Barbato wrote: > On 09/12/14 17:34, Michał Górny wrote: > >> I'm all for keeping it simple. However, backwards compatibility makes >> it hard to keep things simple. I'd love to do, say, metadata.yml >> supporting stuff like: >> >> - maintainer: f...@gentoo.org, b...@gentoo.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: sys-devel/gcc::mgorny up for testing

2014-12-10 Thread viv...@gmail.com
Il 09/12/2014 15:26, Martin Vaeth ha scritto: > viv...@gmail.com wrote: >> - The project only has 20 commit, last one 8 months ago >> https://github.com/m-click/mcpdf.git > The "project" is just a few lines anyway: merely a wrapper to the library. > All the work happens in the itext library whic

Re: [gentoo-dev] metadata.xml un-ization, v2

2014-12-10 Thread Rich Freeman
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 11:04 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > Dnia 2014-12-09, o godz. 12:59:26 > Ulrich Mueller napisał(a): > >> >> As the previously stated goal was to get rid of herds, I don't >> understand why you want to reintroduce them as a value of the >> type attribute. The existing herd elemen

Re: [gentoo-dev] metadata.xml un-ization, v2

2014-12-10 Thread Rich Freeman
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 2:06 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >> On Tue, 9 Dec 2014, Rich Freeman wrote: > >> I thought we were generally agreed we wanted to get rid of herds. >> The goal wasn't to rename them, but to get rid of them. > >> We could have email aliases for bugs so that people can sign

Re: [gentoo-dev] metadata.xml un-ization, v2

2014-12-10 Thread Sergey Popov
09.12.2014 14:59, Ulrich Mueller пишет: > "proxy-maintainer" is very confusing because you won't put the proxy > maintainer there, but the user who is being proxied. Please rename > to something like "proxied" (assuming that this exists as a word in > English) or "by-proxy". +1 for that. Proxy ma

Re: [gentoo-dev] metadata.xml un-ization, v2

2014-12-10 Thread Michał Górny
Dnia 2014-12-09, o godz. 00:46:28 Michał Górny napisał(a): > So considering the previous thread, the Council and QA discussions, I > have prepared a new version of the metadata.xml update. To hopefully > make everyone happy, I come with this three-step process: And the Council meeting brought a

Re: [gentoo-dev] New portage-9999 plugin-sync system

2014-12-10 Thread Ultrabug
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 06/12/2014 07:11, Brian Dolbec wrote: > > For those people running portage-. I've now merged the new > plugin-sync system into the master branch. I've just added the > following einfo block to the .ebuild. I will be preparing a > new

Re: [gentoo-dev] metadata.xml un-ization, v2

2014-12-10 Thread Luca Barbato
On 09/12/14 17:34, Michał Górny wrote: I'm all for keeping it simple. However, backwards compatibility makes it hard to keep things simple. I'd love to do, say, metadata.yml supporting stuff like: - maintainer: f...@gentoo.org, b...@gentoo.org - maintainer: - name: Foo Bar email: f...@

Re: [gentoo-dev] metadata.xml un-ization, v2

2014-12-10 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Tue, 9 Dec 2014, Rich Freeman wrote: > I thought we were generally agreed we wanted to get rid of herds. > The goal wasn't to rename them, but to get rid of them. > We could have email aliases for bugs so that people can sign up for > notifications, but they would NOT be considered maint