-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 02/19/15 21:14, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> pro: improved security in daemons (often network) con: some
> packages might pull in libseccomp (~250KB)
>
> there shouldn't be measurable runtime overhead here as the
> filtering is done by a JIT in the ke
On 02/19/2015 03:43 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
>
> I believe the proposal was for this to be purely optional. As such I
> completely support it (though I think we should consider just using
> the -dev-help list if it is still functional).
Purely optional.
To correct my original email, the mailing
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 2:06 PM, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> Please explain this proposal in more detail. If code review is
> supposed to be mandatory for each commit, this will effectively stop
> development. If it is supposed to be used as an auxiliary but
> not mandatory tool, e.g. when people ar
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 1:30 PM, hasufell wrote:
> * teams in gentoo are a mess, because they mostly "work" without much
> communication and are sort of a "badge" for people to randomly touch
> ebuilds they are not familiar with
So, this is also something I don't like about our present structure.
On Wed, 18 Feb 2015 19:58:29 +0800
Ben de Groot wrote:
> The attached patch proposes two helper functions to be added to
> qmake-utils.eclass. These functions echo the correct directory where
> qt binaries such as moc and lrelease are located. They can be used in
> ebuilds when such binaries need
On Thu, 19 Feb 2015 14:14:37 -0500
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> pro: improved security in daemons (often network)
> con: some packages might pull in libseccomp (~250KB)
>
> there shouldn't be measurable runtime overhead here as the filtering
> is done by a JIT in the kernel itself. if the kernel lac
pro: improved security in daemons (often network)
con: some packages might pull in libseccomp (~250KB)
there shouldn't be measurable runtime overhead here as the filtering is done by
a JIT in the kernel itself. if the kernel lacks support for seccomp, daemons
generally should fallback at runtim
Rich Freeman:
>
> Devs should be communicating with maintainers when they touch their
> packages.
That's basically all I said.
The rest looks like imagination and flame about elephants and the end of
the world while I clearly didn't refer to any of that.
This isn't about "protocol", it's about
On Wed, 18 Feb 2015 15:13:31 -0500 Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> The topic of a review workflow comes up frequently, but Gitlab, Gerrit,
> etc. are blocked on a host of other problems that may never be resolved.
> It would still be nice to be able to request reviews somewhere, and for
> ebuilds, a mail
Hello, everyone.
One month from today, on 2015-03-20 we are celebrating the 2.5yr
anniversary of EAPI=5 being officially approved. For this occasion,
Python team has prepared something special for you. This day we are
going to ban support for EAPI=4 in new ebuilds.
Today I have committed a QA war
Patrick Lauer:
> On Thursday 19 February 2015 00:48:18 hasufell wrote:
>> Patrick Lauer:
>>> Why is this package metadata missing the python herd for no reason?
>>
>> Because the python herd doesn't currently maintain the package, nor did
>> they ask me to be co-maintainers.
>>
>
> So you put a py
Michael Orlitzky writes:
> Would anyone else find gentoo-review@lists.g.o useful? I think a lot
> of simple problems could be quickly caught with a second set of
> eyeballs.
+1
Many opensource projects successfully run code review on mailing lists.
Why not try that. But this should be loudly an
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 4:39 AM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> On 02/19/2015 10:31 AM, Patrick Lauer wrote:
>> On Thursday 19 February 2015 10:07:30 Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
>>> On 02/19/2015 09:57 AM, Markos Chandras wrote:
On 02/19/15 06:10, Mike Gilbert wrote: What saddens me the most
On 02/19/15 06:38, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Feb 2015 19:34:28 +0800
> Patrick Lauer wrote:
>
>> On Thursday 19 February 2015 12:31:27 Alexis Ballier wrote:
>>> On Wed, 18 Feb 2015 22:48:27 +0100
>>>
>>> Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2015-02-18, o godz. 16:11:53
"Mike Frysinge
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 02/19/15 13:38, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Feb 2015 19:34:28 +0800 Patrick Lauer
> wrote:
>
>> On Thursday 19 February 2015 12:31:27 Alexis Ballier wrote:
>>> On Wed, 18 Feb 2015 22:48:27 +0100
>>>
>>> Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 201
On Thu, 19 Feb 2015 19:34:28 +0800
Patrick Lauer wrote:
> On Thursday 19 February 2015 12:31:27 Alexis Ballier wrote:
> > On Wed, 18 Feb 2015 22:48:27 +0100
> >
> > Michał Górny wrote:
> > > Dnia 2015-02-18, o godz. 16:11:53
> > >
> > > "Mike Frysinger (vapier)" napisał(a):
> > > > vapier
On Thursday 19 February 2015 12:31:27 Alexis Ballier wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Feb 2015 22:48:27 +0100
>
> Michał Górny wrote:
> > Dnia 2015-02-18, o godz. 16:11:53
> >
> > "Mike Frysinger (vapier)" napisał(a):
> > > vapier 15/02/18 16:11:53
> > >
> > > Modified: fcaps.eclass
> >
On Wed, 18 Feb 2015 22:48:27 +0100
Michał Górny wrote:
> Dnia 2015-02-18, o godz. 16:11:53
> "Mike Frysinger (vapier)" napisał(a):
>
> > vapier 15/02/18 16:11:53
> >
> > Modified: fcaps.eclass
> > Log:
> > clarify USE=filecaps intention #540430
> >
> > Revision Changes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 02/19/2015 10:31 AM, Patrick Lauer wrote:
> On Thursday 19 February 2015 10:07:30 Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
>> On 02/19/2015 09:57 AM, Markos Chandras wrote:
>>> On 02/19/15 06:10, Mike Gilbert wrote: What saddens me the most
>>> is that these
On Thursday 19 February 2015 10:07:30 Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> On 02/19/2015 09:57 AM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> > On 02/19/15 06:10, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> > What saddens me the most is that these pointless threads are
> > becoming sort of a habit not because the reporter is really
> > offende
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 02/19/2015 09:57 AM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> On 02/19/15 06:10, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 7:08 PM, Patrick Lauer
>> wrote:
>>> On Wednesday 18 February 2015 18:43:59 hasufell wrote:
..
>
>
> What saddens me the most is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 02/19/15 06:10, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 7:08 PM, Patrick Lauer
> wrote:
>> On Wednesday 18 February 2015 18:43:59 hasufell wrote:
>>> Is there a communication problem?
>>>
>>> I don't remember getting either: * a bug report
22 matches
Mail list logo
