Le 26/02/2015 17:08, Michael Mair-Keimberger a écrit :
net-misc/qtnx net-misc/nxcl (bug #537774 #537778)
Both ebuilds fetch the same source code and my first though was we have
the same package under two different names. I might be wrong here as i
didn't looked into it. However since the last
I wonder if it would be possible to use the script from
sys-apps/getent(included below)
to impl. getent instead of using glibc's getent? I cannot see any downside, is
there one?
This would help a lot(just seed your groups/users is in ROOT/etc/{passwd,group
...} first)
when cross building or
On 03/03/2015 04:14 AM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
Another week, another service...
The Gentoo Infra team now presents the relaunched Git web interface, now
hosted at: gitweb.gentoo.org.
It's cgit-based, but has working redirects for all prior gitweb
locations:
Hi,
We currently have two mechanisms to influence building of packages
that cannot be binary redistributed. Some 150 packages have
RESTRICT=bindist (unconditional, or USE conditional), whereas
27 packages have the bindist flag in their IUSE. Until very recently,
the two sets were practically
On Tue, 3 Mar 2015 12:59:55 -0800
Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote:
This can be useful for making settings, such as PKGDIR, relative
to PORTAGE_CONFIGROOT.
X-Gentoo-Bug: 511806
X-Gentoo-Bug-URL: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=511806
---
pym/portage/package/ebuild/config.py |
This can be useful for making settings, such as PKGDIR, relative
to PORTAGE_CONFIGROOT.
X-Gentoo-Bug: 511806
X-Gentoo-Bug-URL: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=511806
---
pym/portage/package/ebuild/config.py | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git
On 03/03/2015 10:39 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
I wonder if it would be possible to use the script from
sys-apps/getent(included below)
to impl. getent instead of using glibc's getent? I cannot see any downside,
is there one?
Please re-send to the gentoo-dev mailing list.
--
Thanks,
Zac
On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 10:12:07PM +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
So a few days ago I filed bug 541408 and dependent bugs, with the goal
that ebuilds with the bindist flag in their IUSE should also add
RESTRICT=!bindist? ( bindist ). However, it turned out that some 10
packages are using the
On Wed, 4 Mar 2015, Robin H Johnson wrote:
On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 10:12:07PM +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
However, it turned out that some 10 packages are using the bindist
flag only in REQUIRED_USE but nowhere else [2] (with foo being some
feature flag):
IUSE=bindist foo
On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 11:57:40PM +0200, Markos Chandras wrote:
One that that I miss though is the git (+ssh) links for rw access to the
repositories. It's not obvious what url to use to clone a repository for
rw access. Is there a way to generate such urls on the web interface?
It does
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 4:12 PM, Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote:
IMHO, the bindist USE flag is redundant in these cases. So we should
get rid of the REQUIRED_USE and add a restriction instead:
IUSE=foo
RESTRICT=foo? ( bindist )
What do you think? Should we proceed in this
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 7:10 PM, Mike Gilbert flop...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 4:12 PM, Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote:
IMHO, the bindist USE flag is redundant in these cases. So we should
get rid of the REQUIRED_USE and add a restriction instead:
IUSE=foo
12 matches
Mail list logo
