[gentoo-dev] Re: gnatbuild.eclass refactoring: new/transitory eclass?

2015-09-04 Thread Duncan
Alexandre Rostovtsev posted on Fri, 04 Sep 2015 10:05:31 -0400 as excerpted: > On Thu, 2015-09-03 at 16:00 +0200, George Shapovalov wrote: >> 2. Is there some standard naming scheme? Should the new eclass be >> called, say, >> gnatbuild2.eclass or gnatbuild-ng.eclass? Of course this only matters >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2015-08-30 23:59 UTC

2015-09-04 Thread Kent Fredric
On 5 September 2015 at 06:51, Michał Górny wrote: >> information. How else would we determine this? > > PGP key matching? /.mailmap git help shortlog -> MAPPING AUTHORS This system allows displaying committers under spellings/aliases/email addresses other than the one they committed as for an

Re: [gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2015-08-30 23:59 UTC

2015-09-04 Thread Matthew Thode
On 09/04/2015 01:51 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > Dnia 2015-09-04, o godz. 19:43:41 > James Le Cuirot napisał(a): > >> On Fri, 4 Sep 2015 13:15:57 -0500 >> Matthew Thode wrote: >> >>> uh, this is wrong btw :P >>> >>> I am both mthode and prometheanfire >> >> Your fault for committing with the wrong

Re: [gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2015-08-30 23:59 UTC

2015-09-04 Thread Michał Górny
Dnia 2015-09-04, o godz. 19:43:41 James Le Cuirot napisał(a): > On Fri, 4 Sep 2015 13:15:57 -0500 > Matthew Thode wrote: > > > uh, this is wrong btw :P > > > > I am both mthode and prometheanfire > > Your fault for committing with the wrong e-mail address? :P Perhaps > they're linked in GitHu

Re: [gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2015-08-30 23:59 UTC

2015-09-04 Thread James Le Cuirot
On Fri, 4 Sep 2015 13:15:57 -0500 Matthew Thode wrote: > uh, this is wrong btw :P > > I am both mthode and prometheanfire Your fault for committing with the wrong e-mail address? :P Perhaps they're linked in GitHub but I wouldn't want to use that as a source of information. How else would we de

Re: [gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2015-08-30 23:59 UTC

2015-09-04 Thread Matthew Thode
On 09/04/2015 03:53 AM, malc wrote: > James - you're right - I hadn't paid attention to MTA wrapping... > Patrice - even though it's counter to what James asked, I added short > sha-1s [ i.e. the output of git rev-parse --short > f1cb2b98f62fa9cbf1ef5a0f149dd47fee6964be ] > Now the output looks lik

Re: [gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2015-08-30 23:59 UTC

2015-09-04 Thread Kent Fredric
On 5 September 2015 at 01:12, Aaron W. Swenson wrote: > Would you consider dropping the TZ offset? If the script were to translate > the DT to UTC, that'd remove some noise and shorten the line by 5. +1 > dev-java/antenna 2015-09-03 13:45:07Z monsieurp b4215f4 > > And I know

Re: [gentoo-dev] gnatbuild.eclass refactoring: new/transitory eclass?

2015-09-04 Thread Alexandre Rostovtsev
On Thu, 2015-09-03 at 16:00 +0200, George Shapovalov wrote: > 2. Is there some standard naming scheme? Should the new eclass be called, > say, > gnatbuild2.eclass or gnatbuild-ng.eclass? Of course this only matters if old > eclass is there to stay. If not I'll just call the transitory eclass >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2015-08-30 23:59 UTC

2015-09-04 Thread Aaron W. Swenson
On 2015-09-04 09:53, malc wrote: > James - you're right - I hadn't paid attention to MTA wrapping... > Patrice - even though it's counter to what James asked, I added short > sha-1s [ i.e. the output of git rev-parse --short > f1cb2b98f62fa9cbf1ef5a0f149dd47fee6964be ] > Now the output looks like b

[gentoo-dev] Re: Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2015-08-30 23:59 UTC

2015-09-04 Thread Duncan
Patrice Clement posted on Fri, 04 Sep 2015 11:11:32 +0200 as excerpted: > @infra: do you guys have a public git repo hosted under > http://github.com/gentoo ? This what you're looking for? See this thread: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/96933 While I didn't switch immediat

Re: [gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2015-08-30 23:59 UTC

2015-09-04 Thread Patrice Clement
Friday 04 Sep 2015 09:59:07, James Le Cuirot wrote : > On Fri, 4 Sep 2015 09:53:38 +0100 > malc wrote: > > > James - you're right - I hadn't paid attention to MTA wrapping... > > Patrice - even though it's counter to what James asked, I added short > > sha-1s [ i.e. the output of git rev-parse --

Re: [gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2015-08-30 23:59 UTC

2015-09-04 Thread James Le Cuirot
On Fri, 4 Sep 2015 09:53:38 +0100 malc wrote: > James - you're right - I hadn't paid attention to MTA wrapping... > Patrice - even though it's counter to what James asked, I added short > sha-1s [ i.e. the output of git rev-parse --short > f1cb2b98f62fa9cbf1ef5a0f149dd47fee6964be ] > Now the outp

Re: [gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2015-08-30 23:59 UTC

2015-09-04 Thread malc
James - you're right - I hadn't paid attention to MTA wrapping... Patrice - even though it's counter to what James asked, I added short sha-1s [ i.e. the output of git rev-parse --short f1cb2b98f62fa9cbf1ef5a0f149dd47fee6964be ] Now the output looks like below (or attached txt file) Removals: dev-