Alexandre Rostovtsev posted on Fri, 04 Sep 2015 10:05:31 -0400 as
excerpted:
> On Thu, 2015-09-03 at 16:00 +0200, George Shapovalov wrote:
>> 2. Is there some standard naming scheme? Should the new eclass be
>> called, say,
>> gnatbuild2.eclass or gnatbuild-ng.eclass? Of course this only matters
>
On 5 September 2015 at 06:51, Michał Górny wrote:
>> information. How else would we determine this?
>
> PGP key matching?
/.mailmap
git help shortlog -> MAPPING AUTHORS
This system allows displaying committers under spellings/aliases/email
addresses other than the one they committed as for an
On 09/04/2015 01:51 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> Dnia 2015-09-04, o godz. 19:43:41
> James Le Cuirot napisał(a):
>
>> On Fri, 4 Sep 2015 13:15:57 -0500
>> Matthew Thode wrote:
>>
>>> uh, this is wrong btw :P
>>>
>>> I am both mthode and prometheanfire
>>
>> Your fault for committing with the wrong
Dnia 2015-09-04, o godz. 19:43:41
James Le Cuirot napisał(a):
> On Fri, 4 Sep 2015 13:15:57 -0500
> Matthew Thode wrote:
>
> > uh, this is wrong btw :P
> >
> > I am both mthode and prometheanfire
>
> Your fault for committing with the wrong e-mail address? :P Perhaps
> they're linked in GitHu
On Fri, 4 Sep 2015 13:15:57 -0500
Matthew Thode wrote:
> uh, this is wrong btw :P
>
> I am both mthode and prometheanfire
Your fault for committing with the wrong e-mail address? :P Perhaps
they're linked in GitHub but I wouldn't want to use that as a source of
information. How else would we de
On 09/04/2015 03:53 AM, malc wrote:
> James - you're right - I hadn't paid attention to MTA wrapping...
> Patrice - even though it's counter to what James asked, I added short
> sha-1s [ i.e. the output of git rev-parse --short
> f1cb2b98f62fa9cbf1ef5a0f149dd47fee6964be ]
> Now the output looks lik
On 5 September 2015 at 01:12, Aaron W. Swenson wrote:
> Would you consider dropping the TZ offset? If the script were to translate
> the DT to UTC, that'd remove some noise and shorten the line by 5.
+1
> dev-java/antenna 2015-09-03 13:45:07Z monsieurp b4215f4
>
> And I know
On Thu, 2015-09-03 at 16:00 +0200, George Shapovalov wrote:
> 2. Is there some standard naming scheme? Should the new eclass be called,
> say,
> gnatbuild2.eclass or gnatbuild-ng.eclass? Of course this only matters if old
> eclass is there to stay. If not I'll just call the transitory eclass
>
On 2015-09-04 09:53, malc wrote:
> James - you're right - I hadn't paid attention to MTA wrapping...
> Patrice - even though it's counter to what James asked, I added short
> sha-1s [ i.e. the output of git rev-parse --short
> f1cb2b98f62fa9cbf1ef5a0f149dd47fee6964be ]
> Now the output looks like b
Patrice Clement posted on Fri, 04 Sep 2015 11:11:32 +0200 as excerpted:
> @infra: do you guys have a public git repo hosted under
> http://github.com/gentoo ?
This what you're looking for? See this thread:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/96933
While I didn't switch immediat
Friday 04 Sep 2015 09:59:07, James Le Cuirot wrote :
> On Fri, 4 Sep 2015 09:53:38 +0100
> malc wrote:
>
> > James - you're right - I hadn't paid attention to MTA wrapping...
> > Patrice - even though it's counter to what James asked, I added short
> > sha-1s [ i.e. the output of git rev-parse --
On Fri, 4 Sep 2015 09:53:38 +0100
malc wrote:
> James - you're right - I hadn't paid attention to MTA wrapping...
> Patrice - even though it's counter to what James asked, I added short
> sha-1s [ i.e. the output of git rev-parse --short
> f1cb2b98f62fa9cbf1ef5a0f149dd47fee6964be ]
> Now the outp
James - you're right - I hadn't paid attention to MTA wrapping...
Patrice - even though it's counter to what James asked, I added short
sha-1s [ i.e. the output of git rev-parse --short
f1cb2b98f62fa9cbf1ef5a0f149dd47fee6964be ]
Now the output looks like below (or attached txt file)
Removals:
dev-
13 matches
Mail list logo
