[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-ruby/ruby-webkit-gtk and dev-ruby/ruby-webkit-gtk2

2017-03-02 Thread Hans de Graaff
# Hans de Graaff (03 Mar 2017) # Masked for removal in 30 days. # Bindings for old webkit versions that have open security # issues. No reverse dependencies. Bug #608608 dev-ruby/ruby-webkit-gtk dev-ruby/ruby-webkit-gtk2 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed

[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH v2] movefile: support in-kernel file copying on Linux (bug 607868)

2017-03-02 Thread Zac Medico
Perform in-kernel file copying when possible, and also support reflinks and sparse files. If the optimized implementation fails at runtime, gracefully fallback to a plain read/write loop. Compile-time and run-time fallbacks are implemented, so that any incompatiblities will be handled gracefully.

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: media-video/lives

2017-03-02 Thread Andreas Sturmlechner
# Andreas Sturmlechner (03 Mar 2017) # Masked for removal in 30 days. Reported to be broken; # QA issues, fails to build with GCC-5, ffmpeg-3 # Bugs #608408, #569958, #610746 media-video/lives

[gentoo-dev] Last-rites: x11-misc/andromeda

2017-03-02 Thread Andreas Sturmlechner
# Andreas Sturmlechner (03 Mar 2017) # Masked for removal in 30 days. Dead upstream, Qt4Webkit, # fails to build. Bug #602260 x11-misc/andromeda

Re: [gentoo-dev] new virtual -- virtual/go to fix go build time dependencies

2017-03-02 Thread Alexis Ballier
On Thu, 2 Mar 2017 17:36:16 -0500 Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 03/02/2017 04:53 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote: > >> > >> Back on topic: > >> > >> What kind of dependency do we need, anyway? William, are you saying > >> that if I upgrade dev-lang/go, then things will break, but if I >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Suggested sync method/Portage config for devs on ~arch?

2017-03-02 Thread Andrew Savchenko
On Tue, 28 Feb 2017 11:14:47 +0100 Thomas Deutschmann wrote: > On 2017-02-28 10:52, James Le Cuirot wrote: > > I use hasufell's repo too. I'm surprised we haven't made it more > > official. > > The public Gentoo git mirror is > > https://github.com/gentoo-mirror/gentoo Please note that this

Re: [gentoo-dev] new virtual -- virtual/go to fix go build time dependencies

2017-03-02 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 03/02/2017 04:53 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote: >> >> Back on topic: >> >> What kind of dependency do we need, anyway? William, are you saying >> that if I upgrade dev-lang/go, then things will break, but if I delete >> dev-lang/go, everything is fine? > > It's likely like ocaml: you link your

Re: [gentoo-dev] new virtual -- virtual/go to fix go build time dependencies

2017-03-02 Thread Alexis Ballier
On Thu, 2 Mar 2017 16:46:22 -0500 Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 03/02/2017 04:30 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > > > The point is to specify dependencies declaratively. A dependency > > expresses a dependency, not an action. If you can't express the > > kind of dependency you

Re: [gentoo-dev] new virtual -- virtual/go to fix go build time dependencies

2017-03-02 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 03/02/2017 04:30 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > The point is to specify dependencies declaratively. A dependency > expresses a dependency, not an action. If you can't express the kind of > dependency you need, then we need either labels or another *DEPEND > variable to take care of it, not a

Re: [gentoo-dev] new virtual -- virtual/go to fix go build time dependencies

2017-03-02 Thread Alexis Ballier
On Thu, 2 Mar 2017 13:06:45 -0800 Zac Medico wrote: > On 03/02/2017 11:24 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > > On 03/02/2017 02:05 PM, Zac Medico wrote: > >>> > >>> This is why we can't have nice things. > >> > >> For those that are interested, I'm planning to to make

Re: [gentoo-dev] new virtual -- virtual/go to fix go build time dependencies

2017-03-02 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Thu, 2 Mar 2017 16:25:54 -0500 Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 03/02/2017 04:06 PM, Zac Medico wrote: > >> > >> I agree with this ^ but I don't think portage should rebuild for > >> DEPEND at all. It creates one more dangerous "it works in > >> portage!" situation that will

Re: [gentoo-dev] new virtual -- virtual/go to fix go build time dependencies

2017-03-02 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 03/02/2017 04:06 PM, Zac Medico wrote: >> >> I agree with this ^ but I don't think portage should rebuild for DEPEND >> at all. It creates one more dangerous "it works in portage!" situation >> that will plague users of other package managers. >> >> (I'm not saying it couldn't be useful, but it

Re: [gentoo-dev] new virtual -- virtual/go to fix go build time dependencies

2017-03-02 Thread Zac Medico
On 03/02/2017 11:24 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 03/02/2017 02:05 PM, Zac Medico wrote: >>> >>> This is why we can't have nice things. >> >> For those that are interested, I'm planning to to make --with-bdeps >> automatically enabled when possible: >> > > > I agree with this ^ but I don't

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] movefile: support in-kernel file copying on Linux (bug 607868)

2017-03-02 Thread Zac Medico
On 03/02/2017 08:24 AM, Michał Górny wrote: >> +if (copyfunc_ret < 0) { >> +if ((errno == EXDEV || errno == ENOSYS) && >> +copyfunc == cfr_wrapper) { >> +/* Use sendfile instead of copy_file_range for >> + *

Re: [gentoo-dev] new virtual -- virtual/go to fix go build time dependencies

2017-03-02 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 03/02/2017 02:05 PM, Zac Medico wrote: >> >> This is why we can't have nice things. > > For those that are interested, I'm planning to to make --with-bdeps > automatically enabled when possible: > I agree with this ^ but I don't think portage should rebuild for DEPEND at all. It creates one

Re: [gentoo-dev] new virtual -- virtual/go to fix go build time dependencies

2017-03-02 Thread Zac Medico
On 03/02/2017 06:47 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 03/02/2017 09:24 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote: >>> >>> In other words, the ":=" only does something special in RDEPEND. That >>> makes sense when you think of it as meaning "the thing will break" >>> rather than "I want to do a rebuild." The only

Re: [gentoo-dev] profiles/arch/amd64/no-multilib cleanup WAS: [PATCH 1/8] profiles/hardened: Include base amd64-multilib profile in subprofile

2017-03-02 Thread Michał Górny
W dniu 02.03.2017, czw o godzinie 15∶09 +0100, użytkownik Michael Haubenwallner napisał: > On 01/21/2017 11:59 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > > Include arch/amd64/no-multilib in the hardened no-multilib amd64 > > variant. Confirmed with profile-dumper that it does not currently change > > anything. > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] new virtual -- virtual/go to fix go build time dependencies

2017-03-02 Thread Alexis Ballier
On Thu, 2 Mar 2017 14:56:37 + Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Thu, 2 Mar 2017 09:47:35 -0500 > Michael Orlitzky wrote: > > On 03/02/2017 09:24 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > > >> > > >> In other words, the ":=" only does something special in

Re: [gentoo-dev] new virtual -- virtual/go to fix go build time dependencies

2017-03-02 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Thu, 2 Mar 2017 09:47:35 -0500 Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 03/02/2017 09:24 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > >> > >> In other words, the ":=" only does something special in RDEPEND. > >> That makes sense when you think of it as meaning "the thing will > >> break" rather than "I want

Re: [gentoo-dev] new virtual -- virtual/go to fix go build time dependencies

2017-03-02 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 03/02/2017 09:24 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote: >> >> In other words, the ":=" only does something special in RDEPEND. That >> makes sense when you think of it as meaning "the thing will break" >> rather than "I want to do a rebuild." The only reason it's not an error >> to put them in DEPEND is

Re: [gentoo-dev] new virtual -- virtual/go to fix go build time dependencies

2017-03-02 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 9:03 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 03/02/2017 04:58 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote: >> >> Is it really abusing ? >> := deps in DEPEND only would also make sense for e.g. code generators >> > > Slot operator dependencies are ignored in DEPEND: > > Indicates

[gentoo-dev] profiles/arch/amd64/no-multilib cleanup WAS: [PATCH 1/8] profiles/hardened: Include base amd64-multilib profile in subprofile

2017-03-02 Thread Michael Haubenwallner
On 01/21/2017 11:59 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > Include arch/amd64/no-multilib in the hardened no-multilib amd64 > variant. Confirmed with profile-dumper that it does not currently change > anything. > --- > profiles/hardened/linux/amd64/no-multilib/parent | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >

Re: [gentoo-dev] new virtual -- virtual/go to fix go build time dependencies

2017-03-02 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 03/02/2017 04:58 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote: > > Is it really abusing ? > := deps in DEPEND only would also make sense for e.g. code generators > Slot operator dependencies are ignored in DEPEND: Indicates that any slot value is acceptable. In addition, for runtime dependencies, indicates

[gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH 1/4] profiles/prefix: Add arch/base to parent

2017-03-02 Thread Michael Haubenwallner
On 02/13/2017 03:40 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > --- > profiles/prefix/parent | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/profiles/prefix/parent b/profiles/prefix/parent > index 8f0e9fd7471d..3eaf2c441360 100644 > --- a/profiles/prefix/parent > +++ b/profiles/prefix/parent > @@ -1 +1,2

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/1] eclass/kernel-2: Add additional help text when K_SECURITY_UNSUPPORTED is set

2017-03-02 Thread Alice Ferrazzi
On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 9:09 AM, Mike Pagano wrote: > This patch will add some additional text to bring some additional notice > to users > about the security considerations of a specific kernel and direct them > to the > upstream website for further information. See bug

Re: [gentoo-dev] new virtual -- virtual/go to fix go build time dependencies

2017-03-02 Thread Alexis Ballier
On Wed, 1 Mar 2017 18:18:01 -0600 William Hubbs wrote: > To avoid abusing slot dependencies for dev-lang/go since it is not > needed at runtime I need to do the following. Is it really abusing ? := deps in DEPEND only would also make sense for e.g. code generators