Signed-off-by: Michał Górny
---
sys-kernel/vanilla-kernel-bin/Manifest| 2 +
.../vanilla-kernel-bin-5.4.7-r1.ebuild| 52 +++
2 files changed, 54 insertions(+)
create mode 100644
sys-kernel/vanilla-kernel-bin/vanilla-kernel-bin-5.4.7-r1.ebuild
diff --git a/sys-k
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny
---
.../vanilla-kernel-5.4.7-r1.ebuild| 66 +++
1 file changed, 66 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 sys-kernel/vanilla-kernel/vanilla-kernel-5.4.7-r1.ebuild
diff --git a/sys-kernel/vanilla-kernel/vanilla-kernel-5.4.7-r1.ebuild
b/sys-kerne
Introduce a new eclass that contains common logic for building
distribution kernels from source.
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny
---
eclass/kernel-build.eclass | 175 +
1 file changed, 175 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 eclass/kernel-build.eclass
Changed in v2
Introduce a new eclass that contains common logic needed to test
and install distribution kernels. This is the eclass common both
to kernels built from source and installed from binary packages.
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny
---
eclass/kernel-install.eclass | 309 +
On Sat, 2020-01-04 at 18:41 -0500, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 4, 2020 at 4:24 PM Michał Górny wrote:
> > +# @FUNCTION: kernel-build_src_configure
> > +# @DESCRIPTION:
> > +# Prepare the toolchain for building the kernel, get the default .config
> > +# or restore savedconfig, and get build t
On Sat, Jan 4, 2020 at 9:33 PM Aaron Bauman wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 04, 2020 at 09:11:01PM -0500, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'd appreciate some code review of this before I commit.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Jason
> >
>
> Silence is consent.
Maybe. But there's quite a bit of this that I l
On Sat, Jan 04, 2020 at 09:11:01PM -0500, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd appreciate some code review of this before I commit.
>
> Thanks,
> Jason
>
Silence is consent. I also don't know the original authors are even Gentoo devs
anymore...
--
Cheers,
Aaron
signature.asc
Description:
Signed-off-by: William Hubbs
---
eclass/go-module.eclass | 4
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/eclass/go-module.eclass b/eclass/go-module.eclass
index 9c11959fdf8..89b32ed1201 100644
--- a/eclass/go-module.eclass
+++ b/eclass/go-module.eclass
@@ -59,6 +59,10 @@ BDEPEND=">=dev-la
Hi,
I'd appreciate some code review of this before I commit.
Thanks,
Jason
On Sat, Jan 4, 2020 at 4:24 PM Michał Górny wrote:
> +# @FUNCTION: kernel-build_src_configure
> +# @DESCRIPTION:
> +# Prepare the toolchain for building the kernel, get the default .config
> +# or restore savedconfig, and get build tree configured for modprep.
> +kernel-build_src_configure() {
> +
Before looking at the complete list, some words from me:
All packages have been carefully selected and checked.
Many packages have been abandoned by upstream and only live on user
provided patches.
I also looked at the Debian and Archlinux colleagues,
what they did in their repos.
The bug https://b
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny
---
sys-kernel/vanilla-kernel-bin/Manifest| 2 +
.../vanilla-kernel-bin-5.4.7-r1.ebuild| 52 +++
2 files changed, 54 insertions(+)
create mode 100644
sys-kernel/vanilla-kernel-bin/vanilla-kernel-bin-5.4.7-r1.ebuild
diff --git a/sys-k
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny
---
.../vanilla-kernel-5.4.7-r1.ebuild| 66 +++
1 file changed, 66 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 sys-kernel/vanilla-kernel/vanilla-kernel-5.4.7-r1.ebuild
diff --git a/sys-kernel/vanilla-kernel/vanilla-kernel-5.4.7-r1.ebuild
b/sys-kerne
Introduce a new eclass that contains common logic for building
distribution kernels from source.
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny
---
eclass/kernel-build.eclass | 173 +
1 file changed, 173 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 eclass/kernel-build.eclass
diff --git a/
Introduce a new eclass that contains common logic needed to test
and install distribution kernels. This is the eclass common both
to kernels built from source and installed from binary packages.
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny
---
eclass/kernel-install.eclass | 309 +
On Sat, Jan 4, 2020 at 3:13 PM Christopher Head wrote:
>
>
> Of course this would be a bad argument if V-S were lagging behind upstream
> significantly, and it’s a much better argument for packages that come with
> expectations of security team support than those that don’t, but it is
> somethi
On January 4, 2020 4:54:07 AM PST, Rich Freeman wrote:
>
>Uh, all it does is install kernel sources. They're useless unless you
>build a kernel using them.
>
>Apparently git and tar are too complicated for Gentoo users, but
>managing symlinks, using make, managing a bootloader, dealing with the
>
Am Samstag, 4. Januar 2020, 19:41:05 CET schrieb William Hubbs:
> On Fri, Jan 03, 2020 at 09:55:31AM -0500, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> > On 1/3/20 9:52 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> > > But here we are. Do we make OpenRC Linux-only and steal the fix from
> > > systemd? Or pretend to support other op
# Mike Gilbert (2020-01-04)
# Un-fetchable distfile, bug 704782.
# No maintainer.
# Removal in 30 days.
net-misc/chrome-remote-desktop
On Sat, 2020-01-04 at 12:41 -0600, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 03, 2020 at 09:55:31AM -0500, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> > On 1/3/20 9:52 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> > > But here we are. Do we make OpenRC Linux-only and steal the fix from
> > > systemd? Or pretend to support other operating
On Fri, Jan 03, 2020 at 09:55:31AM -0500, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 1/3/20 9:52 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> >
> > But here we are. Do we make OpenRC Linux-only and steal the fix from
> > systemd? Or pretend to support other operating systems, but leave them
> > insecure?
> >
>
> Or the grip
On Sat, 2020-01-04 at 08:38 +0100, Hanno Böck wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Jan 2020 15:48:54 +0100
> Toralf Förster wrote:
>
> > # Restrict potential illegal access via links
> > #
> > fs.protected_hardlinks = 1
> > fs.protected_symlinks = 1
>
> Given the issues with openrc:
> Wouldn't it be a goo
On Sat, Jan 04, 2020 at 08:38:59AM +0100, Hanno Böck wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Jan 2020 15:48:54 +0100
> Toralf Förster wrote:
>
> > # Restrict potential illegal access via links
> > #
> > fs.protected_hardlinks = 1
> > fs.protected_symlinks = 1
>
> Given the issues with openrc:
> Wouldn't it b
Currently the devmanual git repository contains the history (converted
from subversion) back to 2006-02-20, but apart from two snapshots in
July and August 2005, we don't have anything from before. The wayback
machine has only an incomplete archive of the generated html [1].
Can anybody help? Any
On 2020-01-04 12:01, Rich Freeman wrote:
> Packages without security support should be masked. Really I don't
> see the point of even having this in the repo.
THIS! +infinite
And arches without security support in general can't have stable keywords.
But this is a dream. :-/
--
Regards,
Thoma
On 2020-01-04 14:08, Roy Bamford wrote:
> emerge -1 vanilla-sources
> eselect kernel ...
> genkernel all
> ...
Please tell user to do
genkernel --kernel-config=/proc/config.gz all
by default which will give them a better experience because new kernel
will be build based on kernel configuration f
Am Samstag, 4. Januar 2020, 12:25:07 CET schrieb Michael 'veremitz' Everitt:
> On 04/01/20 11:09, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
> > Am Freitag, 3. Januar 2020, 11:00:14 CET schrieb Rolf Eike Beer:
> >> Am Freitag, 3. Januar 2020, 03:40:35 CET schrieb Aaron Bauman:
> >>> On January 2, 2020 6:35:08 PM EST, R
On 2020.01.04 12:54, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 4, 2020 at 6:42 AM Roy Bamford
> wrote:
[snip]
>
> Apparently git and tar are too complicated for Gentoo users, but
> managing symlinks, using make, managing a bootloader, dealing with the
> kernel's configuration system, and so on are just
On Sat, Jan 4, 2020 at 6:42 AM Roy Bamford wrote:
>
> On 2020.01.04 11:01, Rich Freeman wrote:
> >
> > Is there some reason that we should keep vanilla sources despite not
> > getting security handling?
> >
>
> Gentoo had this discussion before. The outcome was that
> vanilla-sources is just as Li
On 2020.01.04 11:01, Rich Freeman wrote:
>
> Is there some reason that we should keep vanilla sources despite not
> getting security handling?
>
> --
> Rich
>
Rich,
Gentoo had this discussion before. The outcome was that
vanilla-sources is just as Linus intended.
If Gentoo did anything to it,
On 04/01/20 11:09, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
> Am Freitag, 3. Januar 2020, 11:00:14 CET schrieb Rolf Eike Beer:
>> Am Freitag, 3. Januar 2020, 03:40:35 CET schrieb Aaron Bauman:
>>> On January 2, 2020 6:35:08 PM EST, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
Am Freitag, 3. Januar 2020, 00:25:06 CET schrieb Mike Paga
Am Freitag, 3. Januar 2020, 11:00:14 CET schrieb Rolf Eike Beer:
> Am Freitag, 3. Januar 2020, 03:40:35 CET schrieb Aaron Bauman:
> > On January 2, 2020 6:35:08 PM EST, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
> > >Am Freitag, 3. Januar 2020, 00:25:06 CET schrieb Mike Pagano:
> > >> hppa is making us keep old kernel
On Fri, Jan 3, 2020 at 11:28 AM Aaron Bauman wrote:
> On January 3, 2020 9:55:31 AM EST, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> >On 1/3/20 9:52 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> >>
> >> But here we are. Do we make OpenRC Linux-only and steal the fix from
> >> systemd? Or pretend to support other operating systems
The following package is now up for grabs:
net-misc/mosh
--
Patrice Clement
Gentoo Linux developer
http://www.gentoo.org
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
34 matches
Mail list logo