On Mon, 2020-08-10 at 21:55 -0400, Joshua Kinard wrote:
> On 8/10/2020 11:22, William Hubbs wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 12:00:44AM -0400, Joshua Kinard wrote:
> > > On 8/8/2020 14:51, William Hubbs wrote:
> > > > All,
> > > >
> > > > I would like to propose that we switch the default udev
On Tue, 2020-08-11 at 10:59 +0800, Benda Xu wrote:
> Hi William,
>
> William Hubbs writes:
>
> > No one has offered to switch from eudev to udev and look at
> > regressions. People are asking me to show what features exist in udev
> > that aren't in eudev. I stuck with udev. I don't use eudev
Hi William,
William Hubbs writes:
> No one has offered to switch from eudev to udev and look at
> regressions. People are asking me to show what features exist in udev
> that aren't in eudev. I stuck with udev. I don't use eudev so I don't
> know.
I don't think imposing a personal preference
On 8/10/2020 22:08, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 9:55 PM Joshua Kinard wrote:
>>
>> On 8/10/2020 11:22, William Hubbs wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 12:00:44AM -0400, Joshua Kinard wrote:
If eudev is not broken, then why your proposed fix?
>>>
>>> bitrot and bus
On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 9:55 PM Joshua Kinard wrote:
>
> On 8/10/2020 11:22, William Hubbs wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 12:00:44AM -0400, Joshua Kinard wrote:
> >>
> >> If eudev is not broken, then why your proposed fix?
> >
> > bitrot and bus factor.
>
> Examples?
The sole maintainer of
On 8/10/2020 11:22, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 12:00:44AM -0400, Joshua Kinard wrote:
>> On 8/8/2020 14:51, William Hubbs wrote:
>>> All,
>>>
>>> I would like to propose that we switch the default udev provider on new
>>> systems from eudev to udev.
>>>
>>> This is not a
Hi,
To summarize
- There's no known bugs in eudev that are not in udev
- There's no bug that would be fixed by switch from eudev to udev
- There's no new feature that would change eudev to udev bring
- Currently musl and glibc profiles uses common eudev, after change we
whould have musl profile
On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 05:47:52PM +0200, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On Sat, 8 Aug 2020 13:51:41 -0500
> William Hubbs wrote:
>
> > All,
> >
> > I would like to propose that we switch the default udev provider on
> > new systems from eudev to
On 2020.08.10 16:22, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 12:00:44AM -0400, Joshua Kinard wrote:
> > On 8/8/2020 14:51, William Hubbs wrote:
> > > All,
> > >
> > > I would like to propose that we switch the default udev provider
> on new
> > > systems from eudev to udev.
> > >
> > >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Sat, 8 Aug 2020 13:51:41 -0500
William Hubbs wrote:
> All,
>
> I would like to propose that we switch the default udev provider on
> new systems from eudev to udev.
>
> This is not a lastrites, and it will not affect current systems since
>
On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 12:00:44AM -0400, Joshua Kinard wrote:
> On 8/8/2020 14:51, William Hubbs wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > I would like to propose that we switch the default udev provider on new
> > systems from eudev to udev.
> >
> > This is not a lastrites, and it will not affect current
On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 08:49:20AM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 8:16 AM Thomas Deutschmann wrote:
> >
> > On 2020-08-10 14:07, Michał Górny wrote:
> > > ...or a revert of a change made for change's sake.
> >
> > That's a bold statement for an unambiguous 7-0 decision as
On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 8:16 AM Thomas Deutschmann wrote:
>
> On 2020-08-10 14:07, Michał Górny wrote:
> > ...or a revert of a change made for change's sake.
>
> That's a bold statement for an unambiguous 7-0 decision as seen in
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/575718.
As one who voted yes, my
On 2020-08-10 14:07, Michał Górny wrote:
> ...or a revert of a change made for change's sake.
That's a bold statement for an unambiguous 7-0 decision as seen in
https://bugs.gentoo.org/575718.
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D
On Mon, 2020-08-10 at 09:35 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > > > > > On Sun, 09 Aug 2020, William Hubbs wrote:
> > There are roughly 100 commits in the udev master branch since the date
> > of this sync:
> > https://github.com/systemd/systemd/commits/master/src/udev
>
> And what does this tell
On Mon, 2020-08-10 at 13:52 +0200, Thomas Deutschmann wrote:
> On 2020-08-09 23:14, William Hubbs wrote:
> > Here is something else to consider.
> >
> > Blueness and any of the other eudev maintainers are doing good work
> > for alternative c library support such as musl. In fact, the musl
> >
On 2020-08-09 23:14, William Hubbs wrote:
> Here is something else to consider.
>
> Blueness and any of the other eudev maintainers are doing good work
> for alternative c library support such as musl. In fact, the musl
> profiles hard mask sys-fs/udev, so they are covered no matter what
>
> On Sun, 09 Aug 2020, William Hubbs wrote:
> There are roughly 100 commits in the udev master branch since the date
> of this sync:
> https://github.com/systemd/systemd/commits/master/src/udev
And what does this tell us? Commit count isn't very useful as a metric.
Do these commits fix any
18 matches
Mail list logo
