[gentoo-dev] Call for testing from toolchain team: glibc-2.34

2021-10-27 Thread Sam James
Hi,

toolchain@ would appreciate if folks could keyword glibc-2.34 locally
on non-production machines to help root out any bugs.

The tracker bug is doing pretty well at this point with most remaining
issues being in last-rited packages or being tracked upstream:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/803482.

There are no plans to keyword glibc-2.34 yet given there's
a few large changes and we've not yet got over the libxcrypt
hump (that's coming very shortly, stabilisation planned for
2021-11-01!). But you can't start planning too early ;)

I would not recommend doing this on a machine
with Chromium or anything Electron based for now
as I haven't had a chance to check if the sandbox stuff
has been updated. I _think_ Firefox is fine now (at least
in the latest versions >= 91?).

If you're able, please therefore keyword glibc-2.34 on
systems where you're up for a bit of experimentation,
and ideally rebuild (-ev @world) and report any bugs.

If you feel generous, run FEATURES=test on some/all
stuff too.

Please drop into #gentoo-toolchain if you have any
questions or issues we need to debug together.

Cheers!

Best,
sam



Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] 2021-10-27-upgrade-to-net-news_rssguard-4_0: add news item

2021-10-27 Thread Anna Vyalkova
On 2021-10-27 10:19, John Helmert III wrote:
> > +Display-If-Installed:  
> Why the version restriction? Seems unecessary to me, especially for
> anyone who might completely miss the mask who could upgrade straight
> to >=rssguard-4.0 due to when they sync.

Because users, who have already upgraded to 4.0, had seen ewarn in
pkg_pretend phase:

=> 
https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/tree/net-news/rssguard/rssguard-4.0.3.ebuild?id=026dfe93d6c7e9a5e5c51dc94d0364bfbf3a6b03#n34



Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] 2021-10-27-upgrade-to-net-news_rssguard-4_0: add news item

2021-10-27 Thread Joonas Niilola
On 27.10.2021 18.19, John Helmert III wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 10:53:10AM +0500, Anna Vyalkova wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Anna Vyalkova 
>> ---
>> Related to this version bump and unmask:
>> https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-proxy-maint/message/d86352b4ebad8c4ddd14fcd8ce37162f
>>
>>  ...27-upgrade-to-net-news_rssguard-4_0.en.txt | 29 +++
>>  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)
>>  create mode 100644 
>> 2021-10-27-upgrade-to-net-news_rssguard-4_0/2021-10-27-upgrade-to-net-news_rssguard-4_0.en.txt
>>
>> diff --git 
>> a/2021-10-27-upgrade-to-net-news_rssguard-4_0/2021-10-27-upgrade-to-net-news_rssguard-4_0.en.txt
>>  
>> b/2021-10-27-upgrade-to-net-news_rssguard-4_0/2021-10-27-upgrade-to-net-news_rssguard-4_0.en.txt
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000..35971f0
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ 
>> b/2021-10-27-upgrade-to-net-news_rssguard-4_0/2021-10-27-upgrade-to-net-news_rssguard-4_0.en.txt
>> @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
>> +Title: net-news/rssguard-4.0 upgrade
>> +Author: Anna Vyalkova 
>> +Posted: 2021-10-27
>> +Revision: 1
>> +News-Item-Format: 2.0
>> +Display-If-Installed:  
> Why the version restriction? Seems unecessary to me, especially for
> anyone who might completely miss the mask who could upgrade straight
> to >=rssguard-4.0 due to when they sync.
> 

(can't speak for the original author, but) I on the other hand liked it
more this way. Since >=4.0 has been available for quite some time
already (package.masked), people might've done the upgrade with the info
available in pkg_postinst(). And then again this news item seems useless
if you never had <4.0 installed anyway.

You should receive a notification about this news item after you sync,
before you world-update. I do prefer it like this, seems a bit clearer,
but no strong opinions either way...

-- juippis



OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] 2021-10-27-upgrade-to-net-news_rssguard-4_0: add news item

2021-10-27 Thread John Helmert III
On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 10:53:10AM +0500, Anna Vyalkova wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Anna Vyalkova 
> ---
> Related to this version bump and unmask:
> https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-proxy-maint/message/d86352b4ebad8c4ddd14fcd8ce37162f
> 
>  ...27-upgrade-to-net-news_rssguard-4_0.en.txt | 29 +++
>  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 
> 2021-10-27-upgrade-to-net-news_rssguard-4_0/2021-10-27-upgrade-to-net-news_rssguard-4_0.en.txt
> 
> diff --git 
> a/2021-10-27-upgrade-to-net-news_rssguard-4_0/2021-10-27-upgrade-to-net-news_rssguard-4_0.en.txt
>  
> b/2021-10-27-upgrade-to-net-news_rssguard-4_0/2021-10-27-upgrade-to-net-news_rssguard-4_0.en.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 000..35971f0
> --- /dev/null
> +++ 
> b/2021-10-27-upgrade-to-net-news_rssguard-4_0/2021-10-27-upgrade-to-net-news_rssguard-4_0.en.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
> +Title: net-news/rssguard-4.0 upgrade
> +Author: Anna Vyalkova 
> +Posted: 2021-10-27
> +Revision: 1
> +News-Item-Format: 2.0
> +Display-If-Installed: =rssguard-4.0 due to when they sync.

> +
> +RSS Guard database files created by RSS Guard version 3.9.x are
> +incompatible with RSS Guard version 4.0 or later [0].
> +
> +Configuration file (config.ini) is fully backwards compatible according
> +to the upstream. You can save it (File -> Backup settings) before an
> +upgrade and restore it later (File -> Restore settings).
> +
> +There is no reliable way to automate the database format conversion, so
> +action from the user is required before an upgrade can take place.
> +
> +The first option would be to export your feeds as an OMPL file
> +(Accounts -> Export feeds) before an upgrade and import them later
> +(Account -> Import feeds).
> +
> +The second option would be to manually update your database.db file to
> +4.x.x format following a guide by the upstream developer [1].
> +
> +Keep in mind that application data directory has been renamed from
> +"~/.config/RSS Guard" to "~/.config/RSS Guard 4".
> +
> +[0] https://github.com/martinrotter/rssguard/releases/tag/4.0.0
> +[1] 
> https://github.com/martinrotter/rssguard/blob/master/resources/docs/Documentation.md#migratt
> -- 
> 2.33.1
> 
> 


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Removing separate "security supported" arch list

2021-10-27 Thread John Helmert III
On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 10:05:20AM +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Splitting from the discussion in [1] (moving more arhitectures to
> ~arch), I'd like to propose that we remove the "security supported"
> architecture list from [2] and instead level security support with
> the general architecture support in Gentoo, e.g. by having all
> architectures with stable profiles be "security supported".

This will better align the written policy with what actually happens
in reality, so I'm all for it! Thanks for bringing this up.

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] 2021-10-27-upgrade-to-net-news_rssguard-4_0: add news item

2021-10-27 Thread Anna Vyalkova
Signed-off-by: Anna Vyalkova 
---
Related to this version bump and unmask:
https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-proxy-maint/message/d86352b4ebad8c4ddd14fcd8ce37162f

 ...27-upgrade-to-net-news_rssguard-4_0.en.txt | 29 +++
 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 
2021-10-27-upgrade-to-net-news_rssguard-4_0/2021-10-27-upgrade-to-net-news_rssguard-4_0.en.txt

diff --git 
a/2021-10-27-upgrade-to-net-news_rssguard-4_0/2021-10-27-upgrade-to-net-news_rssguard-4_0.en.txt
 
b/2021-10-27-upgrade-to-net-news_rssguard-4_0/2021-10-27-upgrade-to-net-news_rssguard-4_0.en.txt
new file mode 100644
index 000..35971f0
--- /dev/null
+++ 
b/2021-10-27-upgrade-to-net-news_rssguard-4_0/2021-10-27-upgrade-to-net-news_rssguard-4_0.en.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+Title: net-news/rssguard-4.0 upgrade
+Author: Anna Vyalkova 
+Posted: 2021-10-27
+Revision: 1
+News-Item-Format: 2.0
+Display-If-Installed:  Backup settings) before an
+upgrade and restore it later (File -> Restore settings).
+
+There is no reliable way to automate the database format conversion, so
+action from the user is required before an upgrade can take place.
+
+The first option would be to export your feeds as an OMPL file
+(Accounts -> Export feeds) before an upgrade and import them later
+(Account -> Import feeds).
+
+The second option would be to manually update your database.db file to
+4.x.x format following a guide by the upstream developer [1].
+
+Keep in mind that application data directory has been renamed from
+"~/.config/RSS Guard" to "~/.config/RSS Guard 4".
+
+[0] https://github.com/martinrotter/rssguard/releases/tag/4.0.0
+[1] 
https://github.com/martinrotter/rssguard/blob/master/resources/docs/Documentation.md#migratt
-- 
2.33.1