Re: [gentoo-dev] ffmpeg vs libav choice of default

2015-02-06 Thread Ben de Groot
. And as a result, we can unmask the newest version of smplayer, which can now function as a GUI frontend for mpv as well. I would say this is an overall improvement for our end-users. I don't want to get into the politics of it, but just look at it from a practical perspective. -- Cheers, Ben | yngwin Gentoo

Re: [gentoo-dev] ffmpeg vs libav choice of default

2015-02-05 Thread Ben de Groot
a poll to the forum to ask them about their preference. https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-1010096.html They seem pretty strongly in favour of changing the default back to ffmpeg: https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-1010096-postdays-0-postorder-asc-vote-viewresult.html -- Cheers, Ben

Re: [gentoo-dev] ffmpeg vs libav choice of default

2015-02-04 Thread Ben de Groot
: https://github.com/mpv-player/mpv/wiki/FFmpeg-versus-Libav Based on that I would say we should switch back the default to ffmpeg. -- Cheers, Ben | yngwin Gentoo developer

Re: [gentoo-dev] ffmpeg vs libav choice of default

2015-02-04 Thread Ben de Groot
On 4 February 2015 at 17:55, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: Dnia 2015-02-04, o godz. 17:24:03 Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org napisał(a): From an upstream that I care about: https://github.com/mpv-player/mpv/wiki/FFmpeg-versus-Libav Based on that I would say we should switch back

Re: [gentoo-dev] Quick RFC: USE=libav vs FFMPEG_IMPL=libav|ffmpeg

2015-02-02 Thread Ben de Groot
on with business. :) -- Cheers, Ben | yngwin Gentoo developer

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Review: news item and script for CPU_FLAGS_X86

2015-01-23 Thread Ben Kohler
be properly handled. And bugs can be properly handled, etc etc. -Ben

Re: [gentoo-dev] git.gentoo.org/git.overlays.gentoo.org upgrades, 2014/12/24 2014/12/26: gitolite upgrade done

2014-12-28 Thread Ben de Groot
the repositories. What are the plans for returning that service? -- Cheers, Ben | yngwin Gentoo developer

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: glibc versions prior to 2.19-r1

2014-12-24 Thread Ben de Groot
, Ben | yngwin Gentoo developer

Re: [gentoo-dev] Make 'vaapi' USE flag global

2014-11-30 Thread Ben de Groot
/mpv media-video/vlc virtual/ffmpeg www-plugins/gnash Descriptions for that flag are pretty the same and we already have 'vdpau' USE flag, which is for someway similar technology. So, how about making this flag global too? Do it! -- Cheers, Ben | yngwin Gentoo developer

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: razorqt-base/*

2014-11-08 Thread Ben de Groot
On 8 November 2014 19:15, Jauhien Piatlicki jauh...@gentoo.org wrote: Hi Ben, Have you read comments on Qt overlay commit? Have you check reverse dependencies of packages you are masking? razorqt-base/libqtxdg is used by LXQt. So, please, unmask it. I will move it into lxqt-base category

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: razorqt-base/*

2014-11-07 Thread Ben de Groot
# Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org (7 Nov 2014) # Unmaintained, no longer supported, and starting to throw compilation # errors (bug #513906, bug #528372). Masked for removal in 30 days. # Update to lxqt-base/* packages. razorqt-base/libqtxdg razorqt-base/razorqt-appswitcher razorqt-base/razorqt

Re: [gentoo-dev] Add bc back to the stage3

2014-09-27 Thread Ben de Groot
is available through busybox already -- Cheers, Ben | yngwin Gentoo developer

Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-x86 tree cleanup for 'DESCRIPTION ends with a '.' character' warnings

2014-08-18 Thread Ben de Groot
'.' there? I completely support this argument. The warning is correct and should remain in place. -- Cheers, Ben | yngwin Gentoo developer

Re: [gentoo-dev] Supporting both Qt4 and Qt5 builds

2014-08-11 Thread Ben de Groot
respectively) or by slotting? What's your opinion on this? The Qt team has always recommended the useflag method for packages that support more than one major version of Qt. This is also what we implement ourselves. So for consistency's sake, please stick with the useflags. -- Cheers, Ben

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: news item for upower

2014-06-04 Thread Ben Kohler
it is to everyone else. No offense intended. -Ben

Re: [gentoo-dev] Anyone with access to genkernel repository? Or should genkernel be p.masked on amd64 profiles?

2014-05-30 Thread Ben Kohler
, exit, give it to the genkernel maintainer and we're done. -Ben Kohler

Re: [gentoo-dev] Anyone with access to genkernel repository? Or should genkernel be p.masked on amd64 profiles?

2014-05-30 Thread Ben Kohler
of separately packaging the kernel configs. -Ben

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Banning modification of pkg-config files

2014-05-09 Thread Ben de Groot
. Obviously, if upstream does not ship a .pc file or ships a broken one, we try to work with upstream to get it fixed on their end. If they are uncooperative, we fix it on our end. -- Cheers, Ben | yngwin Gentoo developer

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs / looking for new primary maintainers

2014-04-20 Thread Ben de Groot
as maintainer for these last three packages, if anyone is willing to take over. -- Cheers, Ben | yngwin Gentoo developer

Re: [gentoo-dev] Stable masks on multilib packages

2014-04-02 Thread Ben de Groot
On 1 April 2014 21:58, Alexandre Rostovtsev tetrom...@gentoo.org wrote: On Tue, 2014-04-01 at 13:13 +0800, Ben de Groot wrote: On 1 April 2014 06:16, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: Hello, all. The late multilib ppc issues made me re-check our stable masks on abi_x86_* flags

Re: [gentoo-dev] Stable masks on multilib packages

2014-04-02 Thread Ben de Groot
On 2 April 2014 07:38, Patrick Lauer patr...@gentoo.org wrote: On 04/01/2014 01:13 PM, Ben de Groot wrote: On 1 April 2014 06:16, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: Hello, all. The late multilib ppc issues made me re-check our stable masks on abi_x86_* flags and, honestly, I'm not sure

Re: [gentoo-dev] Stable masks on multilib packages

2014-03-31 Thread Ben de Groot
implementation to an overlay for the few people who would actually benefit from it. -- Cheers, Ben | yngwin Gentoo developer

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: GTK USE flag situation (gtk, gtk2, gtk3; relevant to bug #420493)

2014-02-18 Thread Ben de Groot
different preferences. That said, I'm not sure we absolutely need a policy. Though I would agree it would be more elegant if we can solve this matter, to make it easier to grasp by our users. In that case the QA proposal makes sense to me. -- Cheers, Ben | yngwin Gentoo developer

Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Feature Request: making thirdpartymirrors easier to manage

2014-01-09 Thread Ben Kohler
at thirdpartymirrors/mirrorname. -Ben

Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Feature Request: making thirdpartymirrors easier to manage

2014-01-09 Thread Ben Kohler
its own file, one server per line, with comments, etc... will be a huge help in using and maintaining these groups. -Ben

Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage QOS

2014-01-09 Thread Ben Kohler
that you think Gentoo has stopped. You have some great ideas but this is not a sinking ship scenario. -Ben

Re: [gentoo-dev] Recommend cronie instead of vixie-cron in handbook?

2013-12-13 Thread Ben Kohler
or in maillists. Define very long time? //Peter If you have some reason we should be sticking to vixie-cron, please stop being so mysterious and share it with the rest of us. Thanks! -Ben

Re: [gentoo-dev] Recommend cronie instead of vixie-cron in handbook?

2013-12-11 Thread Ben Kohler
in whatever direction even though they have nearly zero detailed understanding of the options they are choosing between. Suggesting cronie in the handbook seems like a no-brainer. Do you have some information on vixie-cron that we're all missing? -Ben

Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc 0.12 - netifrc/newnet mix-up

2013-12-06 Thread Ben Kohler
to warn veteran haven't used the handbook in years people. -Ben

Re: [gentoo-dev] Please consider removing use.stable.mask and package.use.stable.mask

2013-11-14 Thread Ben de Groot
little accountability. -- Cheers, Ben | yngwin Gentoo developer

Re: [gentoo-dev] Please consider removing use.stable.mask and package.use.stable.mask

2013-11-14 Thread Ben de Groot
On 14 November 2013 20:32, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote: On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 7:21 AM, Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote: On 14 November 2013 13:13, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: And how is it possible to discuss anything properly in Gentoo? That's because we have

Re: [gentoo-dev] Please consider removing use.stable.mask and package.use.stable.mask

2013-11-14 Thread Ben de Groot
On 14 November 2013 23:12, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote: On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 7:57 AM, Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote: I said As it is always happy to point out, Council doesn't see itself as leadership, just as a supreme court of appeal, when everything else seems to have

Re: [gentoo-dev] Please consider removing use.stable.mask and package.use.stable.mask

2013-11-14 Thread Ben de Groot
On 15 November 2013 01:32, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote: On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote: I was particularly hit by this as maintainer of freetype, see bugs 455070 and 459352 for some of the mess that could have been avoided. Looks like 455070

Re: [gentoo-dev] Policy-level discussion for minimum versions on dependencies

2013-11-08 Thread Ben de Groot
/ versions we don't support, they are on their own. That said, we can do it as a courtesy to users, when it is brought to our attention. But it's more of an enhancement than a bug, in my opinion. -- Cheers, Ben | yngwin Gentoo developer

Re: [gentoo-dev] Releng breakage with respect to move from dev-python/python-exec to dev-lang/python-exec

2013-11-03 Thread Ben de Groot
and it's implications between that and just -uD the difference is -N, it's in man emerge We really should change this recommendation to --changed-use instead of -N. But we also need a short option for that. -- Cheers, Ben | yngwin Gentoo developer

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: converting /etc/mtab to a symlink

2013-10-14 Thread Ben de Groot
I don't see a compelling case being made for why we should make this change apart from all the other distros are doing it, and quite a few reasons why we shouldn't. I'm open to being convinced, so please tell me why this is good for Gentoo users. -- Cheers, Ben | yngwin Gentoo developer

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: sys-kernel/tuxonice-sources up for grabs

2013-09-22 Thread Ben de Groot
. -- Cheers, Ben | yngwin Gentoo developer

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] git.eclass, git-2.eclass... git-r1.eclass?

2013-08-28 Thread Ben de Groot
for eclass versioning. But that would deserve it's own separate thread. As for naming, I recommend you do a +1 to avoid confusion, so git-3.eclass, or git-r3.eclass. Again, here it would be good to agree on a convention for everyone to follow. -- Cheers, Ben | yngwin Gentoo developer

Re: [gentoo-dev] Moving more arches to dev profiles

2013-08-22 Thread Ben de Groot
On 22 August 2013 18:01, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote: On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 1:39 AM, Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote: On 22 August 2013 01:19, Matt Turner matts...@gentoo.org wrote: On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 8:50 AM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote

Re: [gentoo-dev] Moving more arches to dev profiles

2013-08-21 Thread Ben de Groot
and ppc64 to that list. -- Cheers, Ben | yngwin Gentoo developer

Re: [gentoo-dev] Sets in the tree

2013-08-21 Thread Ben de Groot
Desktop-effects project lead Gentoo Qt project lead Gentoo Proxy maintainers project lead So let's get a proper spec and documentation! Because sets can be very useful, as I'm sure everyone will agree. -- Cheers, Ben | yngwin Gentoo developer

Re: [gentoo-dev] Moving more arches to dev profiles

2013-08-21 Thread Ben de Groot
related packages, and refuse stable keywords for GUI toolkits and their desktop reverse dependencies and the like. Ago is doing a fantastic job, but it would be good to lower his work-load and reduce the bus factor problem. -- Cheers, Ben | yngwin Gentoo developer

Re: [gentoo-dev] gtk2/gtk3 use flags

2013-08-20 Thread Ben de Groot
, Ben | yngwin Gentoo developer

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: stabilization policies

2013-08-20 Thread Ben de Groot
it on an x86 server as well, so I get to do it twice; I can't even copy/paste the list. Yes you can. Just leave out the actual keyword. It will assume ~arch. -- Cheers, Ben | yngwin Gentoo developer

Re: [gentoo-dev] gtk2/gtk3 use flags

2013-08-16 Thread Ben de Groot
-themes:gtk3 - Support GTK 3.x, too x11-wm/fvwm:gtk2-perl - Enable GTK2 Perl bindings -- Michael Weber Gentoo Developer web: https://xmw.de/ mailto: Michael Weber x...@gentoo.org As mentioned on IRC, there's this: https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Gnome_Team_Policies#gtk3 -- Cheers, Ben | yngwin Gentoo

Re: [gentoo-dev] desktop experience on smartphone: thoughts and plans against Ubuntu edge

2013-08-13 Thread Ben de Groot
be interested in such a project. -- Cheers, Ben | yngwin Gentoo developer

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gnome Stabilization 3.6 or 3.8

2013-08-10 Thread Ben Kohler
. People are running gnome-3.8 and systemd today, on gentoo. It's working great for tons of people out there. We're supporting it in #gentoo and on the forums today, with much success. If you (people out there, not you Tom) don't realize that yet, please pull your head out of the sand. -Ben

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gnome Stabilization 3.6 or 3.8

2013-08-09 Thread Ben de Groot
people oppose systemd. It doesn't help to keep so aggressively pushing it. -- Cheers, Ben | yngwin Gentoo developer

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gnome Stabilization 3.6 or 3.8

2013-08-08 Thread Ben de Groot
-candy as well. I raise the freedom of choice card here. And deliberately choosing an uncooperative version doesn't shine a good light. People are free to use a saner desktop environment... -- Cheers, Ben | yngwin Gentoo developer

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gnome Stabilization 3.6 or 3.8

2013-08-08 Thread Ben Kohler
this, rather than abusing keywords. -Ben

Re: [gentoo-dev] renaming gentoo-oldnet

2013-08-04 Thread Ben de Groot
, I had also suggested gentoo-networking. How about gen-net? It's nice, short and the name is more flexible if the pkg is picked up by other distros (something bantied about during previous discussions). ++ -- Cheers, Ben | yngwin Gentoo developer

Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: Kernel Team vanilla-sources policy

2013-08-04 Thread Ben de Groot
/Gentoo-sources/gentoo-sources/ supported version for Gentoo users. s/\. /. /g (or vice versa) -- Cheers, Ben | yngwin Gentoo developer

Re: [gentoo-dev] Vanilla sources stabilization policy change

2013-07-24 Thread Ben Kohler
. -Ben

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: font.eclass add Xorg FontPath elements for non-standard paths

2013-07-04 Thread Ben de Groot
with the number of installed fonts, and that adding your own fontpath entries is both trivial and documented everywhere. We should probably add this to our documentation, and link to that from a post-install message (using readme.gentoo.eclass). -- Cheers, Ben | yngwin Gentoo developer

Re: [gentoo-dev] Proper distribution integration of kernel *-sources, patches and configuration.

2013-07-01 Thread Ben de Groot
in the menuconfig, we can provide options that enable minimal Gentoo requirements by default (DEVTMPFS, making Gentoo systems bootable since an udev release a long time ago) and other distribution stuff. Sounds like a great idea to me! -- Cheers, Ben | yngwin Gentoo developer

Re: [gentoo-dev] Going against co-maintainer's wishes (ref. bug 412697)

2013-05-26 Thread Ben de Groot
On 26 May 2013 02:13, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 05/25/2013 05:14 PM, Ben de Groot wrote: But if a co-maintainer pushes through a change that I oppose, then working together becomes quite difficult. In this case I opted

Re: [gentoo-dev] Going against co-maintainer's wishes (ref. bug 412697)

2013-05-26 Thread Ben de Groot
that systemd is a bad implementation of a bad idea, and to boycott it distro-wide. But you know what they say about common sense... -- Cheers, Ben | yngwin Gentoo developer

Re: [gentoo-dev] Going against co-maintainer's wishes (ref. bug 412697)

2013-05-26 Thread Ben de Groot
On 26 May 2013 00:48, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: On Sun, 26 May 2013 00:14:36 +0800 Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote: Unless I am mistaken, we did NOT agree anywhere that Gentoo maintainers MUST add systemd support when upstream does not ship such files. We did agree

Re: [gentoo-dev] Reusing systemd unit file format / forking systemd (was: Going against co-maintainer's wishes (ref. bug 412697))

2013-05-26 Thread Ben de Groot
On 26 May 2013 15:37, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: On Sun, 26 May 2013 00:14:36 +0800 Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote: Systemd is diametrically opposed to the FreeBSD, customization, extreme configurability, and top-notch developer community aspects of that. Systemd upstream

Re: [gentoo-dev] Going against co-maintainer's wishes (ref. bug 412697)

2013-05-26 Thread Ben de Groot
On 26 May 2013 18:04, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote: On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 3:43 AM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: On Sun, 26 May 2013 15:23:44 +0800 Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote: Where is this policy documented? Nowhere, I think. I've seen it coming in the late

[gentoo-dev] Going against co-maintainer's wishes (ref. bug 412697)

2013-05-25 Thread Ben de Groot
. At least not until we get eselect init sorted out... :) -- Cheers, Ben | yngwin Gentoo developer

Re: [gentoo-dev] Making systemd more accessible to normal users

2013-05-15 Thread Ben de Groot
not a sarcastic question). I hope that everybody does their own reality check. We say that Gentoo stands for choice. That is why we should resist allowing systemd (and Gnome) to take those choices away with their mistaken idea of vertical integration. We do have other options. -- Cheers, Ben | yngwin Gentoo

Re: [gentoo-dev] devmanual moved to github

2013-05-12 Thread Ben de Groot
discussed the move with them already and that any concerns of theirs were understood. //Peter Just push to two remotes, like we have been doing for the qt overlay. -- Cheers, Ben | yngwin Gentoo developer Gentoo Qt project lead, Gentoo Wiki admin

Re: [gentoo-dev] Making systemd more accessible to normal users

2013-05-08 Thread Ben de Groot
users would need them anyway. I would think it is better to add them to a separate systemd-units package. -- Cheers, Ben | yngwin Gentoo developer Gentoo Qt project lead, Gentoo Wiki admin

Re: [gentoo-dev] Making systemd more accessible to normal users

2013-05-08 Thread Ben de Groot
On 8 May 2013 23:39, Fabio Erculiani lx...@gentoo.org wrote: On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 5:26 PM, Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote: On 1 May 2013 18:04, Fabio Erculiani lx...@gentoo.org wrote: It looks like there is some consensus on the effort of making systemd more accessible, while

Re: [gentoo-dev] Making systemd more accessible to normal users

2013-05-08 Thread Ben de Groot
On 8 May 2013 23:49, Fabio Erculiani lx...@gentoo.org wrote: On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 5:39 PM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn chith...@gentoo.org wrote: Ben de Groot schrieb: On 1 May 2013 18:04, Fabio Erculiani lx...@gentoo.org wrote: It looks like there is some consensus on the effort of making

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages using -Werror

2013-05-03 Thread Ben de Groot
is a mistake in release code, but was accepted practice. I've almost never actively removed it from packages I maintain. That will change now, upon learning of this policy. -- Cheers, Ben | yngwin Gentoo developer Gentoo Qt project lead, Gentoo Wiki admin

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages using -Werror

2013-05-03 Thread Ben de Groot
On 3 May 2013 16:36, Kacper Kowalik xarthis...@gentoo.org wrote: On 03.05.2013 10:06, Ben de Groot wrote: On 3 May 2013 12:09, Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org wrote: Most of the bugs filed on the gcc 4.8 tracker so far have been caused by packages being built with -Werror. I just noticed one

Re: [gentoo-dev] FYI: emul-linux-x86-xlibs deps being replaced in gx86

2013-04-22 Thread Ben de Groot
On 22 April 2013 21:51, Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote: On Mon, 22 Apr 2013 20:21:55 +0800 Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote: It should come as no surprise that I am not happy with this. While I applaud your efforts to attempt to improve the multilib situation, I don't think

Re: [gentoo-dev] libpng 1.6 upgrade and subslotting (and misuse of subslotting when there is also normal slotting)

2013-04-05 Thread Ben de Groot
On 6 Apr, 2013 4:46 AM, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote: libpng 1.6 is in portage, but temporarily without KEYWORDS, pending on testign and this conversion, help would be much appericiated with converting the tree to use automatic rebuilds for the upgrade Because there is

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Expanding categories' descriptions

2013-04-04 Thread Ben de Groot
more precise descriptions for all categories. So please come with some suggestions to get the ball rolling! -- Cheers, Ben | yngwin Gentoo developer Gentoo Qt project lead, Gentoo Wiki admin

Re: [gentoo-dev] bash-3.1 stable

2013-04-02 Thread Ben Kohler
sick of hearing about it, I'll stop following the thread. -Ben

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-text/cuneiform

2013-03-25 Thread Ben de Groot
/treeclean.txt It needs some work, and guidexmlification. However, I tried to hit some of the alternatives. I don't think we need to create a new page for that. Just put all this text into the treecleaners page. I suggest putting it in the wiki instead. -- Cheers, Ben | yngwin Gentoo

Re: [gentoo-dev] New install isos needed

2013-03-25 Thread Ben Kohler
paragraph because I definitely agree with everything else you said. -Ben

Re: [gentoo-dev] New install isos needed

2013-03-24 Thread Ben Kohler
, or as-needed based on new features that show up. -Ben

Re: [gentoo-dev] New install isos needed

2013-03-24 Thread Ben Kohler
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Alexander Berntsen alexan...@plaimi.netwrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 24/03/13 20:32, Ben Kohler wrote: I really feel like we should still have an official minimal iso Feelings do not matter. - -- Alexander As a very active

Re: [gentoo-dev] New install isos needed

2013-03-24 Thread Ben Kohler
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Alexander Berntsen alexan...@plaimi.netwrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 24/03/13 20:32, Ben Kohler wrote: I really feel like we should still have an official minimal iso Feelings do not matter. - -- Alexander Just to add a bit

Re: [gentoo-dev] New install isos needed

2013-03-23 Thread Ben de Groot
browser for documentation), and our DVD too heavy. SystemRescueCD seems to hit the sweet spot. Maybe we could do a co-branded edition once in a while? -- Cheers, Ben | yngwin Gentoo developer Gentoo Qt project lead, Gentoo Wiki admin

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Last rites: media-tv/tvtime

2013-03-23 Thread Ben de Groot
tree-cleaning. Users who want to keep this in portage need to step up for proxy-maintainership and address the open bugs. -- Cheers, Ben | yngwin Gentoo developer Gentoo Qt project lead, Gentoo Wiki admin

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New category for LeechCraft

2013-03-06 Thread Ben de Groot
with adding new category? I don't see why not. 2) How should we call it: app-leechcraft, leechcraft-base or anything else? Yes, something like that. -- Cheers, Ben | yngwin Gentoo developer Gentoo Qt project lead, Gentoo Wiki admin

Re: [gentoo-dev] The Gentoo Qt Project wants your help!

2013-03-03 Thread Ben de Groot
On 2 March 2013 15:57, Diego Elio Pettenò flamee...@flameeyes.eu wrote: On 02/03/2013 07:54, Ben de Groot wrote: 1. Get Qt5 ready for inclusion in the tree. This includes writing and improving ebuilds and eclasses, testing to build those, filing bug reports on failure, finding fixes for those

Re: [gentoo-dev] The Gentoo Qt Project wants your help!

2013-03-03 Thread Ben de Groot
On 2 March 2013 20:26, Jauhien Piatlicki jpiatli...@gmail.com wrote: 02.03.13 07:54, Ben de Groot написав(ла): app-admin/keepassx app-text/goldendict If these two packages need a maintainer, I could proxy-maintain them. I'm not a developer, but I have some experience with ebuild writing

Re: [gentoo-dev] The Gentoo Qt Project wants your help!

2013-03-03 Thread Ben de Groot
On 2 March 2013 20:33, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote: On 02/03/13 08:54, Ben de Groot wrote: The Gentoo Qt Project wants your help! sci-calculators/qalculator This project died after the first betas. I propose treecleaning it. We have plenty of more maintained calculators

Re: [gentoo-dev] The Gentoo Qt Project wants your help!

2013-03-02 Thread Ben de Groot
don't have the time to maintain this. Thanks for stepping up. -- Cheers, Ben | yngwin Gentoo developer Gentoo Qt project lead, Gentoo Wiki admin

[gentoo-dev] The Gentoo Qt Project wants your help!

2013-03-01 Thread Ben de Groot
-misc/qps x11-misc/qsynergy x11-misc/tinymount -- Cheers, Ben | yngwin Gentoo developer Gentoo Qt project lead, Gentoo Wiki admin

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] RFC: Graveyard project

2013-02-15 Thread Ben Kohler
) There are also commands like eix --installed-from-overlay to see at a glance what questionable packages may be in play. Clearly we have a dev or 2 with some overlay hate, but I don't really think that's relevant to this project discussion. It certainly shouldn't be a show stopper. -Ben

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] RFC: Graveyard project

2013-02-15 Thread Ben de Groot
these packages. We're just facilitating them with a more centralized solution for this, as there is obvious demand for it. Plus, this may be a stepping stone for users fixing those packages and taking up proxy-maintainership. -- Cheers, Ben | yngwin Gentoo developer Gentoo Qt project lead, Gentoo Wiki admin

Re: Graveyard overlay (was: Re: [gentoo-dev] last rites: games-strategy/x2, games-strategy/x2-demo)

2013-02-14 Thread Ben de Groot
is specifically for Qt3/KDE3. But I guess we could consider merging kde-sunset with graveyard. -- Cheers, Ben | yngwin Gentoo developer Gentoo Qt project lead, Gentoo Wiki admin

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] please sign your manifests

2013-02-13 Thread Ben de Groot
. There is no reason to keep this scattered over multiple locations. -- Cheers, Ben | yngwin Gentoo developer Gentoo Qt project lead, Gentoo Wiki admin

Graveyard overlay (was: Re: [gentoo-dev] last rites: games-strategy/x2, games-strategy/x2-demo)

2013-02-13 Thread Ben de Groot
volunteering some time to keep this running 2. Agreement on a place to host tarballs no longer hosted upstream People who are interested can contact me in the #gentoo-dev-help channel on Freenode. -- Cheers, Ben | yngwin Gentoo developer Gentoo Qt project lead, Gentoo Wiki admin

Re: [gentoo-dev] New, shiny EAPI=5 profiles: volunteer, procedure, preparations

2013-02-10 Thread Ben de Groot
. -- Cheers, Ben | yngwin Gentoo developer Gentoo Qt project lead, Gentoo Wiki admin

Re: [gentoo-dev] Lastrites: media-gfx/picasa, dev-python/papyon, net-voip/telepathy-butterfly, sci-visualization/paraview, x11-misc/xdaf

2013-02-10 Thread Ben de Groot
and keep those packages in the main tree. -- Cheers, Ben | yngwin Gentoo developer Gentoo Qt project lead, Gentoo Wiki admin

Re: News item (was: Re: [gentoo-dev] New, shiny EAPI=5 profiles: volunteer, procedure, preparations)

2013-02-10 Thread Ben de Groot
, but otherwise nothing changes. -- Andreas K. Huettel Gentoo Linux developer dilfri...@gentoo.org http://www.akhuettel.de/ Looks good to me! -- Cheers, Ben | yngwin Gentoo developer Gentoo Qt project lead, Gentoo Wiki admin

Re: [gentoo-dev] Rename Creative Commons license files?

2013-02-08 Thread Ben de Groot
effort. Ulrich [1] http://www.spdx.org/licenses/ Yes please! -- Cheers, Ben | yngwin Gentoo developer Gentoo Qt project lead, Gentoo Wiki admin

Re: [gentoo-dev] New eclass: cmake-multilib for cmake multilib package builds

2013-02-07 Thread Ben de Groot
the same header consistency check as autotools-multilib (therefore, I move the function to multilib-build). I'm attaching an ebuild for virtualgl as an example of use. I see no attachments... -- Cheers, Ben | yngwin Gentoo developer Gentoo Qt project lead, Gentoo Wiki admin

Re: [gentoo-dev] New eclass: cmake-multilib for cmake multilib package builds

2013-02-07 Thread Ben de Groot
On 7 February 2013 16:36, Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote: On 6 February 2013 04:19, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: The idea is the same as in autotools-multilib. The eclass is a straightfoward wrapper for cmake-utils which inherits multilib-build and runs cmake phase functions

Re: readme.gentoo.eclass: use echo -e instead of plain echo (Was: Re: [gentoo-dev] readme.gentoo.eclass: Add a DISABLE_AUTOFORMATTING variable=

2013-02-01 Thread Ben de Groot
patch attached This will add an option to disabling autoformatting to let people get their doc_contents 100% respected if they want How about using an as-is argument to readme.gentoo_create_doc? That would be more concise. :-) -- Cheers, Ben | yngwin Gentoo developer Gentoo Qt project lead

Re: readme.gentoo.eclass: use echo -e instead of plain echo (Was: Re: [gentoo-dev] readme.gentoo.eclass: Add a DISABLE_AUTOFORMATTING variable=

2013-01-30 Thread Ben de Groot
On 30 January 2013 05:47, Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote: El mar, 29-01-2013 a las 14:03 +0800, Ben de Groot escribió: On 29 January 2013 03:30, Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote: El lun, 28-01-2013 a las 14:37 +0800, Ben de Groot escribió: I've started using this eclass

Re: readme.gentoo.eclass: use echo -e instead of plain echo (Was: Re: [gentoo-dev] readme.gentoo.eclass: Add a DISABLE_AUTOFORMATTING variable=

2013-01-28 Thread Ben de Groot
On 29 January 2013 03:30, Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote: El lun, 28-01-2013 a las 14:37 +0800, Ben de Groot escribió: I've started using this eclass, but with README files, not the variable, because this is currently the only way I can make sure it honours my formatting. Couldn't

Re: readme.gentoo.eclass: use echo -e instead of plain echo (Was: Re: [gentoo-dev] readme.gentoo.eclass: Add a DISABLE_AUTOFORMATTING variable=

2013-01-27 Thread Ben de Groot
I've started using this eclass, but with README files, not the variable, because this is currently the only way I can make sure it honours my formatting. -- Cheers, Ben | yngwin Gentoo developer Gentoo Qt project lead, Gentoo Wiki admin

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   >