Re: [gentoo-dev] Why you use Gentoo

2006-09-08 Thread David Grant
On 9/7/06, Chris White [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All responses off list please. Please people, it's common sense to read emails before you reply to them. :-)-- David Granthttp://www.davidgrant.ca

Re: [gentoo-dev] New dev: dev-zero

2006-09-27 Thread David Grant
On 9/27/06, Simon Stelling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all,It is with great pleasure that I announce the devification of Tiziano'dev-zero' Müller. He writes us:I'm from Zurich, Switzerland. Born here and still living here:-)I'm studying physics at the University of Zurich and working in a small

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: treecleaner removals

2006-09-28 Thread David Grant
On 9/28/06, Michael Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +++ Mark Stier [28/09/06 15:35 +0200]:How about entering the removed ebuilds into bugzilla under an adequatesection?I think my original reply got lost, so just in case - seems like a time forsunset overlays ;0 or sunrise rather...-- David

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: treecleaner removals

2006-10-01 Thread David Grant
On 9/28/06, Alec Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Christian 'Opfer' Faulhammer wrote: Tach David,0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID) David Grant schrieb: On 9/28/06, Michael Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +++ Mark Stier [28/09/06 15:35 +0200]: How about entering the removed ebuilds into bugzilla under

Re: [gentoo-dev] comments on how flamewars are handled elsewhere

2007-03-08 Thread David Grant
be considered bad netiquette, but that's just me. At least Tom Wesley's comment could have been sent off-list. -- David Grant http://www.davidgrant.ca