On Monday, March 23, 2009 23:35:00 Tiziano Müller wrote:
> Am Montag, den 23.03.2009, 23:08 +0100 schrieb Peter Alfredsen:
> > Since genstef has been .away for some time, I arranged with him that I'd
> > send a list of his ebuilds that need maintenance to be put up for grabs.
> > This list contains
make contact multiple times to understand the situation before
retiring anyone.
There is an important security aspect to retiring folks - commit abilities.
Perhaps in the case a dev wants to contribute but cannot in the near future
their commit privs can just be revoked until such time they a
make: *** [all] Error 2
>
>
> I'm going to try attaching the git patch to the version bump bug
> (send-email won't handle it )
I've had success building dev-db/mysql-community-5.0.77 some days ago. I
commented on your version bump bug[1]. Can we please take this discussion
there? Thanks.
[1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=260574
Gordon Malm (gengor)
RSBAC has been without a maintainer for some time and Hardened is
discontinuing support for RSBAC. As such, the following packages are going
into package.mask for eventual removal after January 31st, 2009.
sys-apps/rsbac-admin
sys-kernel/rsbac-sources
Gordon Malm (gengor)
Should be able to find which gcc was used by checking LDPATH in the
environment.bz2. I believe it is about the only gcc version information
recorded in /var/db/pkg/// though.
Gordon Malm (gengor)
On Monday, December 8, 2008 16:44:16 Federico Ferri wrote:
> Hello,
> today I hit this ann
On Monday, November 3, 2008 02:22:12 Peter Volkov wrote:
> В Вск, 02/11/2008 в 12:11 -0700, Gordon Malm пишет:
> > You can cry "abuse" all you want. You FAIL to offer any alternatives or
> > solutions. I'll ask again, how do you detect that you are compiling code
&g
On Sunday, November 2, 2008 03:26:14 Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sat, 1 Nov 2008 18:29:03 -0700
>
> Gordon Malm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You're the one assuming the only purpose would be to mask parallel
> > make problems. Apparently it does have a purpose
ou assumed it is a parallelism issue that people are trying to solve. I
haven't pointed to any user configuration issues. Using RESTRICT=distcc on
kernel modules is hardly overkill. This isn't openoffice. I know exactly
what the problem is, but since you have such a better grasp on i
On Saturday, November 1, 2008 15:11:16 Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sat, 1 Nov 2008 14:58:39 -0700
>
> Gordon Malm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I use madwifi-ng extensively and have experienced the same issue with
> > madwifi-ng as stated in that bug. For bug #167844,
On Saturday, November 1, 2008 14:28:06 Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sat, 1 Nov 2008 14:21:43 -0700
>
> Gordon Malm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If you're compiling an out-of-tree module that requires the kernel be
> > compiled with support for a particular item a
lso this doozie. -> #167844.
Thanks,
Gordon Malm (gengor)
On Saturday, November 1, 2008 14:00:17 Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sat, 1 Nov 2008 13:57:17 -0700
>
> Gordon Malm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > But in the case of out-of-tree kernel modules the idea
> > of d
fundamentally flawed IMO.
Additionally, there are a few packages in the tree already that will never
get fixed (or be fixable) and just have some check for FEATURES=distcc &&
die "disable distcc" type stuff.
Thanks,
Gordon Malm (gengor)
12 matches
Mail list logo
