if we wanted to be really
stupid, or we could just admit that we don't have to make a bunch of
anal terminology nerds happy and continue on using sane naming
--
Jon Portnoy
avenj/irc.freenode.net
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
? There are obviously reasons, as you're a very
talented person spending quite a bit of time on the project, but equally
obviously, I'm not familiar enough with them to make a good G/FBSD
representative, at this point.
I'll probably be using it sometime soon because ports is archaic at best
--
Jon
before handling this particular incident. I don't think
it's so unreasonable to have backup plans for preserving Gentoo when
devrel cannot respond in a timely manner
--
Jon Portnoy
avenj/irc.freenode.net
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
everyone wants to replace?
I agree some of the wording should be altered, but I do think it's
sensible for infra to cover when devrel falls on its rear.
--
Jon Portnoy
avenj/irc.freenode.net
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 02:10:20AM +0200, Jan Kundrát wrote:
Jon Portnoy wrote:
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 01:40:59AM +0200, Danny van Dyk wrote:
This is how it has been handled so far except in the ciaranm incident. This
is
how I personally think this should be handled in future
--
Jon Portnoy
avenj/irc.freenode.net
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 09:27:39PM -0500, Grant Goodyear wrote:
Jon Portnoy wrote: [Mon Apr 03 2006, 06:52:33PM CDT]
On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 07:35:52PM -0400, Aron Griffis wrote:
Clearly this sentence states that Infra has usurped the suspension
process. It's very disappointing since
of
the proposed code of conduct :)
--
Jon Portnoy
avenj/irc.freenode.net
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 12:30:29PM +0200, Jan Kundrát wrote:
Jon Portnoy wrote:
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 11:50:18AM +0200, Jan Kundrát wrote:
I feel really confused. Have you read the logs of the recent affair?
Devrel *hadn't* requested anything, infra made an action on their own
to progress... this is why we elect representatives.
Overall I think this would be a regression.
--
Jon Portnoy
avenj/irc.freenode.net
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
or not, anybody can contribute.
They don't need to be @gentoo.org to do so. What we really need is to
focus more on those outside contributions.
--
Jon Portnoy
avenj/irc.freenode.net
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 09:38:17AM -0500, Daniel Goller wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jon Portnoy wrote:
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 08:41:31AM -0500, Daniel Goller wrote:
inviting community) and why you think stricter test make for better
developers, why you think
issue from where I'm sitting...
--
Jon Portnoy
avenj/irc.freenode.net
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
.
Please don't change your wording on that. The feel really strongly
about the primary pkg manager of Gentoo needing remain under the full
control of Gentoo Linux.
Agreed, I'm of the opinion it would be inappropriate to let an outside
entity steer our primary package manager.
--
Jon
).
If the primary package manager is controlled by Gentoo, we exercise
somewhat more control over the direction it takes in the first place
and can avoid ever needing to fork or deal with any potentially poor
upstream relations.
--
Jon Portnoy
avenj/irc.freenode.net
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
very much object to using any gentoo.org infrastructure or
subdomains to do so. If someone is going to tackle that, it should be
done outside of Gentoo proper. We don't need to be stuck maintaining and
supporting a semiofficial overlay.
--
Jon Portnoy
avenj/irc.freenode.net
--
gentoo-dev
submitted the maintainer-wanted ebuilds?
And while we're talking collateral damage, could the Sunrise folks
please make sure it's abundantly clear that users shouldn't ask for
support in #gentoo after installing any Sunrise ebuilds?
Thanks,
Jon Portnoy
avenj/irc.freenode.net
--
gentoo-dev
developers for extended history of QA violations.
Not true, unfortunately these problems seem to very rarely get
communicated to devrel...
--
Jon Portnoy
avenj/irc.freenode.net
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
? You're the only one getting territorial about
it, I'm curious as to what the real issue is.
--
Jon Portnoy
avenj/irc.freenode.net
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 08:50:49AM +0300, Eray Aslan wrote:
Just replying randomly.
On 05.04.2010 04:33, Tobias Heinlein wrote:
I think this is a good starting point to get rid of the some important
questions are too hard to answer dilemma that can be implemented
relatively fast. On top
On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 05:50:49PM +0100, George Prowse wrote:
That assumes the system is working perfectly and the whole fact that
we are having this discussion would go against that.
From what i've read in the community, lots of people would have no
problems helping out maintaining
I've resigned the devrel lead position; dmwaters will be filling it. I'm
too unglued lately to deal with silly crap, and frankly Deedra's been
doing the vast majority of devrel managing for a long time anyway.
I'll be sticking around in devrel to maintain the quiz and provide
input.
--
Jon
On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 02:00:57PM +0200, Krzysiek Pawlik wrote:
Jon Portnoy wrote:
Symlink? If MIT == MetaKit, then:
^^
ln -s MIT MetaKit
I don't know about this specific case but generally speaking licenses
that're similar in language and intent have very small
you don't turn it on I'd have to say the only
way it'd get turned on is if your system is already compromised
--
Jon Portnoy
avenj/irc.freenode.net
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
deserve a different treatment.
AFAIK they still plan to go through devrel, just add a forums person to
the recruiters team so existing recruiters aren't flooded with new staff
all of a sudden
--
Jon Portnoy
avenj/irc.freenode.net
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 06:48:51AM -0400, Jon Portnoy wrote:
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 12:28:20PM +0200, Fernando J. Pereda wrote:
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 12:19:34PM +0200, Ioannis Aslanidis wrote:
I still don't see *WHY* you should be different from us. If you want to
manage your
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 01:00:21PM +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
On Tuesday 28 June 2005 12:48, Jon Portnoy wrote:
AFAIK they still plan to go through devrel, just add a forums person to
the recruiters team so existing recruiters aren't flooded with new staff
all of a sudden
assuming here). So what/where is
the big deal about it?
Maybe just that Developer sounds prettier than Staff. The rest is
exactly as you stated. Now let me ask developers this:
Does it really matter you if we are called developers instead of staff?
Yes. You don't develop anything
--
Jon
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 01:01:57PM +0200, Ioannis Aslanidis wrote:
On 6/28/05, Jon Portnoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Developers have CVS access; take the ebuild quiz and you're a developer,
take the staff quiz (the eight-question quiz some mods apparently don't
like for whatever bizarre
and think:
Am I making myself look like a bigger asshat than the other guy?
Please try to refrain from posting any more stupid flames to what is
supposed to be a productive development list. This is not USENET.
--
Jon Portnoy
avenj/irc.freenode.net
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 12:00:50PM -0400, Nathan L. Adams wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jon Portnoy wrote:
On Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 10:54:46AM -0400, Nathan L. Adams wrote:
So when can we discuss the salaries you're going to pay the team leads
to waste fairly
resolution reviewed
every time is a problem, maybe you should start there :)
--
Jon Portnoy
avenj/irc.freenode.net
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 11:31:30AM -0400, Nathan L. Adams wrote:
I really am curious here:
a) What are the team leads spending most of their time on?
Hopefully not reading this thread
--
Jon Portnoy
avenj/irc.freenode.net
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
point taken, working on it, don't impair our productivity more than that.
thank you
The only devs I've seen complain are yourself and Jon Portnoy. Nobody is
forcing you to read the thread...
I hate to be the bearer of bad news but that's because you don't realize
how many devs
, conflict resolution, disciplinary issues. I.e., 'managing
developers.'
--
Jon Portnoy
avenj/irc.freenode.net
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
by the QA
team
--
Jon Portnoy
avenj/irc.freenode.net
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
? Bwahahahah... err. :) )
--
Jon Portnoy
avenj/irc.freenode.net
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
). These are not closed groups.
Agreed.
We don't need a second devrel, rather we need to make sure QA isn't
ignored by devrel
--
Jon Portnoy
avenj/irc.freenode.net
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
think that the actual pain would be minimal.
^^^
Haven't been to #gentoo lately have you? :)
--
Jon Portnoy
avenj/irc.freenode.net
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
: someone who pays for goods or services [syn: {client}]
When did we start selling Gentoo?
(Admittedly we sell optical media via the Gentoo Store, but the software
is still free-as-in-beer)
--
Jon Portnoy
avenj/irc.freenode.net
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 01:52:18PM -0400, Richard Yao wrote:
The improvement is to the ebuild itself. It is a variable containing a
list of directories upon which the module's build system depends.
I spoke to naota and he doesn't have any problem sending this upstream,
so I sent an email
producing code for the project, trust me on that one.
Perhaps get involved in userrel then?
Plenty of ways to get involved without necessarily producing code
directly
--
Jon Portnoy
avenj/irc.freenode.net
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
is really concerned about; robbat2
has already laid claim to fortune-mod-gentoo-dev ;)
Later. It's been fun, it's been real, but it hasn't been real fun. :)
I'll be around #gentoo/#-dev.
--
Jon Portnoy
avenj/irc.freenode.net
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Sun, Jul 04, 2010 at 09:03:41PM -0400, Olivier Cr?te wrote:
On Sun, 2010-07-04 at 18:15 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
which is trivial to fix and anyone with commit privs could have done. it
certainly doesnt warrant a paniced the sky is falling message.
I think this is a great occasion
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 08:48:30PM +0400, Igor wrote:
Do we have an agreement on this one from everyone of the list?
Agreement on what, precisely...?
In open source, better implementations usually gain more mindshare.
If you think you can write one (and the project is interesting to you)
go
45 matches
Mail list logo
