.
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
shouldnt be ignoring these sort of problems, we
should be fixing them
Seems a forced ignore would fix them. (problem solved! next bug..)
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Sun, 2007-10-21 at 15:12 +0200, Marius Mauch wrote:
On Sun, 21 Oct 2007 05:23:45 -0700
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2007-10-21 at 13:01 +0200, Marius Mauch wrote:
So, what do people think about removing (some) of the special
treatment for the system and world targets
time for me to leave the Gentoo train.
Marius
I will always remember you as the guy who provided us with the much
needed glsa*.py (thank you again)
Take care and I wish you the best in all your future endeavors.
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
that FEATURES='strict' is enabled per default in all
profiles. It's rather vital that things remain the way they are now.
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
not if you are hitting it.
http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-projects/portage-utils/libq/vdb_get_next_dir.c?r1=1.2r2=1.3
--
Ned Ludd so...@gentoo.org
Gentoo Linux
On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 17:05 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday 16 March 2009 14:35:15 Ned Ludd wrote:
On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 18:34 +0200, Amit Dor-Shifer wrote:
Hi all.
While working on my overlay, I stumbled on an issue where qfile refused
to acknowledge an installed file
On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 19:45 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday 16 March 2009 18:49:04 Ned Ludd wrote:
On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 17:05 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday 16 March 2009 14:35:15 Ned Ludd wrote:
On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 18:34 +0200, Amit Dor-Shifer wrote:
Hi all
On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 13:27 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Tuesday 17 March 2009 12:59:58 Ned Ludd wrote:
There is also a bug with atom parsing iirc on 32bit platforms. gradm was
the test case. Think we need to change from int to long.
the code is documented as having 64bit limitations
problem in the embedded world with cross compiling via
portage. 222895 If that is the case, then I owe you a beer. one about
the size of a keg.
--
Ned Ludd so...@gentoo.org
Gentoo Linux
On Thu, 2009-03-26 at 08:26 +0100, Markus Duft wrote:
On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 11:44 -0700, Ned Ludd wrote:
[snip]
While much of what you are talking about here mainly applies to prefix,
it looks to me from glancing over the code that you might of solved a
long standing problem
On Sat, 2009-04-18 at 12:55 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Thursday 16 April 2009 19:05:46 Ned Ludd wrote:
On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 10:50 -0700, Ned Ludd wrote:
On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 13:27 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Tuesday 17 March 2009 12:59:58 Ned Ludd wrote:
There is also
-[2.1.6.11]
Quick work around that should be safe would be to
tr '[,]' ' , ' |awk '{print $3-$4}'
It is expected however that -q vs no -q will result in the atoms being
at the same index.
--
Ned Ludd so...@gentoo.org
Gentoo Linux
On Thu, 2009-05-07 at 13:18 -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ned Ludd wrote:
On Thu, 2009-05-07 at 10:00 +0300, Amit Dor-Shifer wrote:
Hi.
Seems like --columns depends on -q to work:
amit0 ~ # emerge -p --color=n --columns -O -q portage
R
On Sun, 2010-02-14 at 12:11 -0800, Zac Medico wrote:
On 02/14/2010 04:36 AM, Brian Harring wrote:
This gets nasty... you're basically talking about the rpm equivalent
of EPOCH.
Not a fan of an adhoc UUID (especially since it'll become standard
via portage doing it), but a *timestamp*
to map each binpkg into the url space
for it.
~harring
--
Ned Ludd so...@gentoo.org
Gentoo Linux
201 - 216 of 216 matches
Mail list logo
