On Sat, 2009-04-18 at 12:55 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Thursday 16 April 2009 19:05:46 Ned Ludd wrote: > > On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 10:50 -0700, Ned Ludd wrote: > > > On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 13:27 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > > On Tuesday 17 March 2009 12:59:58 Ned Ludd wrote: > > > > > There is also a bug with atom parsing iirc on 32bit platforms. gradm > > > > > was the test case. Think we need to change from int to long. > > > > > > > > the code is documented as having 64bit limitations for any specific > > > > component. the last release doesnt have the updated work i did in qatom > > > > to handle the latest atom spec though, and that includes moving from > > > > 32bit to 64bit for components ... > > > > > > Sounds good. > > > > > > > > Maybe another with -rX parsing. > > > > > > > > if you're thinking of the open bug, that's an eprefix specific > > > > extension. they turned the X in -rX into a floating point #. which > > > > isnt supported currently. > > > > > > I don't think that was it. But I can't recall well enough off the top of > > > my head the problem that somebody pointed out to me one day on irc while > > > I was probably too busy. > > > > The error was pointed out to me again today on irc by jmbsvicetto and > > hoffie, which reminded me of what I had forgot before in this thread. > > > > The problem was/is that qpkg is not handling -rX extensions properly. > > you'll have to be more specific. like i said, -rX extensions are a prefix > extension and not part of the standard tree and/or spec. i'm not going to > implement every random thing that someone feels like adding. > -mike
Heh. I don't think you understand the problem yet. Not a feature request.. It's a real bug/regression. See the bug# that jmbsvicetto filed this morn about it. https://bugs.gentoo.org/266646
