On 03/01/13 03:28, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/02/2013 06:11 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El lun, 29-10-2012 a las 10:39 -0400, Rich Freeman escribió:
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
wrote:
I'm confident no one woul
On 02/01/13 17:28, Matt Turner wrote:
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 4:11 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
i'd say never. there is no benefit in switching. pkg-config is the default
implementation from freedesktop.org.
pkg-config is now lighter and has less dependencies than before as the
switch
On 02/01/13 15:29, Luca Barbato wrote:
last I checked prefix didn't have issues with the pkg-config bootstrap
either. there is no circular deps either.
check glib deps iirc some non-glibc platforms have few problems with it.
not if you enable USE=internal-glib. i've added the USE flag on requ
On 01/01/13 23:01, Jeff Horelick wrote:
I would like to propose a switch of the order of DEPENDs in
virtual/pkgconfig to make dev-util/pkgconf[pkg-config] the default
choice for new installations.
dev-util/pkgconf has less external dependencies, is lighter and is
faster than dev-util/pkgconfig w
On 17/12/12 06:02, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 16/12/12 09:55 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 10:35:44PM -0500, Richard Yao wrote:
On 12/15/2012 10:03 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 07:10:22PM -0500, Richard Yao
On 16/12/12 18:57, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
3. Get off CVS for Christ's sake. Nobody wants to work with that. I
don't know how this fits into my bullet list, but it's important.
Meh. I actually like CVS and it's very suitable for gentoo-x86 tree.
However, if enough people want a change
On 16/12/12 01:02, William Hubbs wrote:
All,
what are the specific choices I made in udev that are distro choices vs
upstream choices. People have said to me a couple of times that there
were choices I made that are not upstream choices. If there is something
I can undo in udev to make it easier
On 01/12/12 23:50, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 01/12/12 12:55, Markos Chandras wrote:
Hi,
net-im/skype needs a maintainer. It's currently maintained by the
net-im team which is not very active.
If you look at the ChangeLog you will see that for the past few years
random developers are tryi
On 01/12/12 12:55, Markos Chandras wrote:
Hi,
net-im/skype needs a maintainer. It's currently maintained by the
net-im team which is not very active.
If you look at the ChangeLog you will see that for the past few years
random developers are trying to keep it
up to date ( and thanks for that! ).
On 23/11/12 16:03, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
Hi guys,
wayland: Enable dev-libs/wayland backend
vdpau: Enable the Video Decode and Presentation API for Unix
acceleration interface.
Cheers
Tom
+1. Please do.
On 19/11/12 16:59, William Hubbs wrote:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 09:39:59AM -0500, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 10:38 PM, Joshua Kinard wrote:
Correct me if wrong, but didn't the issue start with udev wanting to put the
PCI ID database/file into /usr/share from /etc?
Well, I ca
On 18/11/12 17:04, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
On 18/11/2012 03:11, Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov wrote:
[Just asking because all you angry answers to some devs make me think
that you're on SysD side, when tons of Gentoo users and Gentoo devs are
on "non-SysD-related udev" side.]
The fact you're as
On 18/11/12 16:11, hasufell wrote:
On 11/18/2012 03:08 PM, Peter Alfredsen wrote:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 10:43 AM, justin wrote:
On 16/11/12 09:48, Samuli Suominen wrote:
does this mean it puts the binary-only package, nvidia-cg-toolkit, to
the default search path when you call the linker
On 18/11/12 07:19, Greg KH wrote:
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 12:00:52AM -0500, Richard Yao wrote:
Having a builtin is a good idea, but the implementation as a mandatory
dependency on kmod is not. The plan is to reintroduce it as an optional
dependency, so that distributions (and Gentoo users) that
On 18/11/12 10:21, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
On 18/11/2012 00:08, Greg KH wrote:
But if this fork is now the "official Gentoo fork", owned by the Gentoo
Foundation, and it's the way forward that Gentoo the distro is going to
take with regards to how the boot process works on the system, then I
h
On 18/11/12 07:47, Doug Goldstein (cardoe) wrote:
cardoe 12/11/18 05:47:02
Modified: nvidia-driver.eclass
Log:
Update to support a new legacy series
Revision ChangesPath
1.16 eclass/nvidia-driver.eclass
file :
http://sources.gentoo.org/viewvc.cgi
# Samuli Suominen (16 Nov 2012)
# Unused in gentoo-x86 and fails to compile wrt bug #438894
# Removal in 30 days
dev-python/metacity-python
On 16/11/12 00:07, Justin Lecher (jlec) wrote:
jlec12/11/15 22:07:13
Modified: 80cgc-opt-2
Log:
media-gfx/nvidia-cg-toolkit: Version BUmp, #270480, thanks Myckel Habets,
Piotr Szymaniak and Jean-Marc Hengen working on the ebuild; add multilib
support, #262477, than
On 14/11/12 12:36, Peter Stuge wrote:
It also means that if I had strong interest in XFCE then I would work
on getting patches from other distribution upstream, so that Gentoo
did not need to have any patches at all.
I also want to clarify that *everything* we have for XFCE in gentoo-x86
now *
On 14/11/12 12:36, Peter Stuge wrote:
Samuli Suominen wrote:
I'm just afraid our XFCE port gets lagged behind because of this as
compared to other distros ...
I am, as you know, a strong proponent of doing things right, rather
than doing them fast.
In this case that means that it is no
Everything printed by ...
http://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/genrdeps/rindex/xfce-base/libxfcegui4
... if not fixed already by an ~arch version needs a patch that ports it
from libxfcegui4 to libxfce4ui
These patches are available mainly at ...
http://bugzilla.xfce.org/ (anything submitted
On 30/10/12 19:02, Steev Klimaszewski wrote:
On Mon, 2012-10-29 at 09:50 +, Markos Chandras wrote:
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
Hello
I would like to know about mobile team status and also show that this
team has important bugs assigned to them for a long time, som
On 31/10/12 20:17, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 12:15 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
eclass/ handling should go to repoman and the automated ChangeLog process,
should be rather straight forward for knowing person.
Perhaps, but right now the policy is to update it, so do it. The
On 31/10/12 17:04, Alexis Ballier wrote:
On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 23:22:01 +0200
Samuli Suominen wrote:
[...]
One of the commits was before anything was said to ML (the EAPI
change), the comment was later but the commenter didn't notice it
just got fixed minutes before that.
I didn
On 31/10/12 17:39, Alexis Ballier wrote:
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 11:35:41 -0400
Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 31/10/12 11:26 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 18:39:44 -0600 Ryan Hill
wrote: [...]
The file is pointless if not everyone is
On 31/10/12 10:56, Fabian Groffen wrote:
On 31-10-2012 09:51:51 +0200, Samuli Suominen wrote:
I don't do prefix and I'm _always_ expecting a patch from prefix@ for
prefix issues.
In that case, please don't invent prefix things yourself. Thanks.
Thank you for reviewing
On 31/10/12 17:09, Michał Górny wrote:
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 11:57:49 -0300
Alexis Ballier wrote:
On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 21:18:02 +0100
Michał Górny wrote:
[...]
Don't even try to touch any of my eclasses without prior asking.
A bit aggressive but its rather obvious that this is the norm not th
On 31/10/12 09:50, Fabian Groffen wrote:
On 30-10-2012 23:22:01 +0200, Samuli Suominen wrote:
So exactly what is (your) problem with the current eclass now?
Your eclass pretends to support Prefix, but it is broken in that
respect, and because some other eclass does it the same way (your
claim
We have been in this situation before where I've had to clean out old
boost versions because the toolchain went forward as it should.
22 Apr 2010; Samuli Suominen
-boost-1.36.0-r1.ebuild:
Remove boost-1.36.0 for gcc-porting wrt #287638.
So all of this should come as no suprise to anyone.
- Samuli
On 30/10/12 23:24, Michał Górny wrote:
On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 20:17:25 +0100
Fabian Groffen wrote:
On 30-10-2012 19:08:39 +, Samuli Suominen wrote:
Added: udev.eclass
Log:
New eclass to determine udevdir from udev.pc pkg-config file as requested by
many people, without ML review due to
On 30/10/12 23:16, Fabian Groffen wrote:
On 30-10-2012 15:47:51 -0500, Doug Goldstein wrote:
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
On 30-10-2012 19:08:39 +, Samuli Suominen wrote:
Added: udev.eclass
Log:
New eclass to determine udevdir from udev.pc pkg-config file as
On 30/10/12 22:49, Michael Mol wrote:
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò
mailto:flamee...@flameeyes.eu>> wrote:
On 30/10/2012 13:39, Michael Mol wrote:
> In general, I agree...but Boost wasn't intended to be a shared
library,
> so there shouldn't be a conflict
On 30/10/12 22:18, Michał Górny wrote:
On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 17:08:07 -0300
Alexis Ballier wrote:
On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 21:57:11 +0200
Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 30/10/12 21:56, Alexis Ballier wrote:
On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 19:08:39 + (UTC)
"Samuli Suominen (ssuominen)" wrote:
[.
On 30/10/12 22:06, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 30/10/12 03:56 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 19:08:39 + (UTC) "Samuli Suominen
(ssuominen)" wrote:
[...]
case ${EAPI:-0} in 0|1|2|3|4) ;; *) die "${ECLASS}.ecl
On 30/10/12 22:02, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 30/10/12 04:00 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 15:56:21 -0400 Ian Stakenvicius
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256
On 30/10/12 03:45 PM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
Dne Ú
On 30/10/12 21:56, Alexis Ballier wrote:
On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 19:08:39 + (UTC)
"Samuli Suominen (ssuominen)" wrote:
[...]
case ${EAPI:-0} in
0|1|2|3|4) ;;
*) die "${ECLASS}.eclass API in EAPI ${EAPI} not yet
established." esac
sounds like a useless an
On 30/10/12 21:17, Fabian Groffen wrote:
On 30-10-2012 19:08:39 +, Samuli Suominen wrote:
Added: udev.eclass
Log:
New eclass to determine udevdir from udev.pc pkg-config file as requested by
many people, without ML review due to unproductive feedback
Uhm...
Please, stop doing this
On 30/10/12 21:24, Michał Górny wrote:
On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 11:30:16 -0700
So given that it's a PITA for the maintainers, a PITA for the users,
eselect boost has been shown to be a bad idea and so on ... can we just
go back to just install it and that's about it?
How are you going to solve the
On 30/10/12 21:17, Fabian Groffen wrote:
On 30-10-2012 19:08:39 +, Samuli Suominen wrote:
Added: udev.eclass
Log:
New eclass to determine udevdir from udev.pc pkg-config file as requested by
many people, without ML review due to unproductive feedback
Uhm...
Please, stop doing this
On 28/10/12 14:26, Pacho Ramos wrote:
Hello
I would like to know about mobile team status and also show that this
team has important bugs assigned to them for a long time, some of them
with patches (and reporters angry because of seeing things untouched for
a long time).
If anyone has time to j
On 22/10/12 03:52, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
Jauhien Piatlicki schrieb:
Both firefox and thunderbird have xul library. Before there was a
separate package xulrunner in the tree, but as Mozilla does not
provide it as a separate package now (as far as I remember) both
firefox and thunder
On 19/10/12 22:01, Pacho Ramos wrote:
Hello
At least in spanish, it's mandatory to end phrases with a dot ".", would
you agree with trying to enforce this trivial change with a repoman
warning?
Thanks for your opinions
I've just dropped the dot from sci-calculators/galculator without
readin
On 26/09/12 08:24, Ryan Hill wrote:
On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 18:17:03 +0300
Samuli Suominen wrote:
# Samuli Suominen (25 Sep 2012)
# Multiple build failures: #435394, #423991 and #425806
# Other bugs: #270830, #368409
# Unmasking would require addressing the build failure bugs
# Removal in 30
Both would needed an dedicated maintainer to overcome these build
failure bugs. Feel free to unmask once fixed and after you have included
yourself in the metadata.xml. Just because they are semi-popular does
not help if nobody is contributing to them.
# Samuli Suominen (25 Sep 2012
On 18/09/12 13:55, Michael Mol wrote:
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 6:44 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
Use bugzilla's search for 'mediatomb' and you will find multiple counts of
build failures the media-video@ herd is simply not capable of handling due
to lack of resources (manpower
On 18/09/12 13:44, Samuli Suominen wrote:
Use bugzilla's search for 'mediatomb' and you will find multiple counts
of build failures the media-video@ herd is simply not capable of
handling due to lack of resources (manpower)
So if nobody steps up, I've CCd treecleaners at bug
Use bugzilla's search for 'mediatomb' and you will find multiple counts
of build failures the media-video@ herd is simply not capable of
handling due to lack of resources (manpower)
So if nobody steps up, I've CCd treecleaners at bug 423991, the package
shall be removed
- Samuli
On 17/09/12 12:03, Peter Stuge wrote:
Pacho Ramos wrote:
# Pacho Ramos (16 Sep 2012)
# Upstream keeps inactive for ages and, then, it has broke again
# now with gnutls-3 (#421385). Removal in a month.
net-im/jabberd
What about the 1.4 version? It depends on openssl, so maybe it
doesn't have t
# Samuli Suominen (05 Sep 2012)
# Replaced by dev-java/antlr wrt bug #255699 and bug #430078
# Removal in 30 days
dev-util/pccts
=dev-util/-3.1.4-r1
(The patches of -r1 was ported to -r0 for most part)
On 27/08/12 16:46, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
On 27/08/2012 00:18, Samuli Suominen wrote:
why leave the ebuild read $myconf from global scope? $EXTRA_ECONF works
for this
Because extremely simply I forgot to delete the line.
yep, as I guessed, thanks for clearing it (and just ignore rest of
On 27/08/12 10:25, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 10:18:17 +0300
Samuli Suominen wrote:
why leave the ebuild read $myconf from global scope? $EXTRA_ECONF
works for this
As far as ebuilds are concerned, there is no such thing as EXTRA_ECONF.
you mean to say PMS fails to
On 27/08/12 04:52, Diego Petteno (flameeyes) wrote:
flameeyes12/08/27 01:52:43
Modified: ChangeLog
Added:gpa-0.9.3.ebuild
Removed: gpa-0.9.1_pre20100416-r1.ebuild
Log:
Version bump (thanks to Arfrever in bug #432636 for reporting). Simp
Bug 345351 (ready patch and active user intrested in proxy maintainership)
And there is one more, search bugzie for lomoco
(Would do it myself but seriously got no time.)
On 14.08.2012 19:57, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 14.08.2012 16:35, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
On 14/08/2012 02:57, Samuli Suominen wrote:
I highly dislike libexec and have been moving stuff over /usr/lib/$pkg/
on "daily basis"
So instead of discussing this you just decide you don&
On 14.08.2012 17:05, Michał Górny wrote:
On Tue, 14 Aug 2012 12:57:13 +0300
Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 14.08.2012 00:24, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
On 13/08/2012 11:29, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
"/usr/lib// is a directory like /usr/libexec/ or
even /bin. It shares absolutely zero t
On 14.08.2012 17:05, Michał Górny wrote:
On Tue, 14 Aug 2012 12:57:13 +0300
Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 14.08.2012 00:24, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
On 13/08/2012 11:29, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
"/usr/lib// is a directory like /usr/libexec/ or
even /bin. It shares absolutely zero t
On 13.08.2012 19:55, Samuli Suominen wrote:
[ ... ]
I should mention that we have discussed this already,
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=364375
Which was a result of long gentoo-dev ML thread, unfortunately my search
foo failed and I couldn't find straight link to it
Why shou
On 14.08.2012 16:35, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
On 14/08/2012 02:57, Samuli Suominen wrote:
I highly dislike libexec and have been moving stuff over /usr/lib/$pkg/
on "daily basis"
So instead of discussing this you just decide you don't like the path
and go with your preferen
On 14.08.2012 03:24, Olivier Crête wrote:
On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 17:56 -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Alexandre Rostovtsev
wrote:
On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 11:14 -0700, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
Beside the fact that these would probably have looked better in
/usr/libex
On 14.08.2012 00:24, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
On 13/08/2012 11:29, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
"/usr/lib// is a directory like /usr/libexec/ or even /bin. It
shares absolutely zero things with the arch-specific $libdir ,or lib64/.
Yes I know that FHS allows it. I still think it would be clean
http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/profiles/targets/developer/make.defaults?r1=1.11&r2=1.12
For example (these are all where they belong):
$ file /usr/lib/udisks2/udisksd
/usr/lib/udisks2/udisksd: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1
(SYSV), dynamically linked (uses
On 13.08.2012 19:10, Samuli Suominen wrote:
Any insight for bug 421839 would be awesome. I've got no idea on how the
autobuilds work
Stages are getting built wrong and some two dozen apps misbehave due to it
How hard can it be to add new directories?
- Samuli
/run is being created
Any insight for bug 421839 would be awesome. I've got no idea on how the
autobuilds work
Stages are getting built wrong and some two dozen apps misbehave due to it
How hard can it be to add new directories?
- Samuli
On 08/07/2012 03:47 PM, Sylvain Alain wrote:
Hi everyone, for a couple of months now, I see on the list some of
activities about OpenRC been ported to FreeBSD or OpenRC to Debian and
other stuff related to SystemD.
I have some basic questions about all that :
2. I saw on some lists that Gnome/K
On 08/09/2012 12:20 PM, Luca Barbato wrote:
On 08/09/2012 10:57 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
No. I meant to have 'GNU' tools with 'GNU' stripped. Isn't that what
the whole discussion is about? Changing names of tools just for
someone's liking?
No, we are discussing about an upstream merging two unr
On 08/09/2012 05:55 AM, Peter Stuge wrote:
Samuli Suominen wrote:
our mupdf package sucks wrt bugs 407805 and 407807
It's pretty clear that the latter is an upstream problem.
We should patch it to build shared libs, with or without cooperation
from upstream.
> Will yo
On 08/07/2012 06:00 AM, hero...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hi,
"Andreas K. Huettel" writes:
# Andreas K. Huettel (7 Aug 2012)
# Many display bugs and compatibility problems, does not build with cups-1.6.
# Upstream is dead. There's no real way to support this anymore. Masked for
# removal in 30 days.
On 08/06/2012 01:20 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
Ok, a few comments from me.
[ ... ]
>
btw, usb_modeswitch doesn't work if left to /lib/udev with
>=sys-fs/udev-187-r1:
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-932338-highlight-.html
now you know why this came up and why I committed the -r2 in tree
On 08/06/2012 01:42 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
On 06-08-2012 13:37:55 +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
Also, I'm not so sure if this will work correctly for Prefix.
I'm sure that is easily checked and we will get feedback quickly.
I'm sure systemd/udev will never run in (a) Pre
On 08/06/2012 01:20 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
Ok, a few comments from me.
On Mon, 06 Aug 2012 13:00:08 +0300
Samuli Suominen wrote:
--- systemd.eclass 2012-08-06 12:49:20.532528219 +0300
+++ /tmp/systemd.eclass 2012-08-06 12:57:28.333542735 +0300
First of all, I'm not really conv
Patch to avoid duplicating this code to every ebuild.
The second attachment is an example use case for the function.
Soon as this is in, I'll start mass converting the tree for this...
- Samuli
--- systemd.eclass 2012-08-06 12:49:20.532528219 +0300
+++ /tmp/systemd.eclass 2012-08-06 12:57:28.33
If you don't use double [[ then ${ROOT} will need "" quoting
On 08/04/2012 12:29 AM, William Hubbs (williamh) wrote:
williamh12/08/03 21:29:17
Modified: udev-187-r1.ebuild udev-.ebuild ChangeLog
Log:
Add a warning for bug #429466 wrt the /lib/udev->/usr/lib/udev
# Samuli Suominen (31 Jul 2012)
# Masked for removal in 30 days wrt bug 425292. Replaced
# by USE="internal-glib" in >=dev-util/pkgconfig-0.27 or
# you can give dev-util/pkgconf a try.
dev-util/pkg-config-lite
# Samuli Suominen (26 Jul 2012)
# We are in process of dropping most of GTK+-2.x Ubuntu
# Ayatana libraries from tree and unfortunately glipper
# has hardcoded dependency on libappindicator's Python
# GTK+-2.x bindings
# Removal in 30 days
x11-misc/glipper
On 07/13/2012 12:01 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 07/13/2012 12:04 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 22:58:29 +0300
Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 07/11/2012 10:11 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
All,
I am about to release udev-186-r1, which will move everything
currently in /lib/udev to /usr
On 07/13/2012 12:04 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 22:58:29 +0300
Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 07/11/2012 10:11 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
All,
I am about to release udev-186-r1, which will move everything
currently in /lib/udev to /usr/lib/udev.
For packages that install udev rules
On 07/11/2012 10:11 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
All,
I am about to release udev-186-r1, which will move everything currently
in /lib/udev to /usr/lib/udev.
For packages that install udev rules in ${FILESDIR}, we need an eclass
that tests the version of udev installed on the user's system and
instal
On 07/11/2012 04:36 PM, Bernard Cafarelli wrote:
This package historically belongs to the gnustep herd, but ffcall
support in
gnustep has been deprecated for some time now in favor of libffi (in
fact the
USE-flag may go away soon)
Also, I do not have the time to work on it, although it requires
On 07/10/2012 06:18 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
Hello, all.
Since nowadays udev is bundled within systemd, we start having two
libudev providers: >=sys-apps/systemd-185 and sys-fs/udev. Making
the long story short, I would like to introduce a virtual for libudev
which would pull in either of those t
On 07/10/2012 06:18 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
An alternative would be to provide separate virtual/libudev
and virtual/libgudev; and maybe changing ebuilds not to depend on
[hwids] but rather pull in sys-apps/hwids directly (since that's what
the flag does).
USE=hwdb should be reviewed:
>udev-180
On 07/08/2012 11:10 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
On Sun, 08 Jul 2012 19:49:25 +0200
René Neumann wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like just to receive a short clarification about the 'status' of
base.eclass: Is this eclass expected to be available everywhere, i.e.
should each eclass make sure it imports and inc
On 07/02/2012 11:51 AM, Natanael Olaiz wrote:
It is LGPL, not GPL.
diff -aru liblo_original/liblo-0.26.ebuild liblo/liblo-0.26.ebuild
--- liblo_original/liblo-0.26.ebuild2011-09-12 20:38:28.0 +0200
+++ liblo/liblo-0.26.ebuild 2012-07-02 10:43:29.0 +0200
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
Don't need or care about this anymore, feel free to pick up if you use it
One open bug, http://bugs.gentoo.org/403883
to clarify:
vmware and xchat-gnome are the only reasons why x11-libs/libsexy is
still in Portage
# Samuli Suominen (02 Jul 2012)
# The functionality of libsexy has been moved to GTK+
# Nothing is using these bindings in Portage anymore
# See, http://bugs.gentoo.org/380193
# Removal in 30
The logic in prune_libtool_files is not perfect[1].
If you are updating ebuild for whatever reason and see `find` command to
punt .la files, and replace it with prune_libtool_files then you also
need to build the package (with "every" possible USE flag combination)
to see if --all argument is
# Samuli Suominen (25 Jun 2012)
# Replaced by the new 1.0.0 release of x11-apps/transset.
# Removal in 30 days.
x11-misc/transset-df
Open a bug at http://bugs.gentoo.org/ instead of mailing here.
Yeah, I know bugzilla is down but it's only temporary.
- Samuli
On 06/25/2012 02:54 PM, Francesco Riosa wrote:
neither stable tdb-1.2.9 nor tdb-1.2.10 install any shared library
when build with distcc, because of a failing chech @
On 06/21/2012 11:42 AM, Ben de Groot wrote:
Please don't fix things that aren't broken.
ditto :)
On 06/21/2012 10:37 AM, Ben de Groot (yngwin) wrote:
yngwin 12/06/21 07:37:15
Modified: lightdm-1.2.2-r2.ebuild ChangeLog
Log:
Re-tidy. Restore glib slot. Drop unnecessary gobject-introspection minimal
version (there is nothing lower in tree). Restore useful comments.
On 06/20/2012 06:46 AM, Doug Goldstein wrote:
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 10:27 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 06/20/2012 06:19 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Tuesday 19 June 2012 22:46:26 Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 06/15/2012 06:10 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Friday 15 June 2012 03:44:14
On 06/20/2012 06:19 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Tuesday 19 June 2012 22:46:26 Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 06/15/2012 06:10 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Friday 15 June 2012 03:44:14 Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 06/13/2012 06:02 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
i've noticed a growing trend where p
On 06/15/2012 06:10 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Friday 15 June 2012 03:44:14 Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 06/13/2012 06:02 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
i've noticed a growing trend where people put setup of variables into
pkg_setup that only matter to src_* funcs presumably so they don'
On 06/19/2012 10:10 AM, Naohiro Aota wrote:
Samuli Suominen writes:
On 06/17/2012 10:12 AM, Naohiro Aota (naota) wrote:
naota 12/06/17 07:12:19
Modified: ChangeLog
Log:
Add ~x86-fbsd. #419621
(Portage version: 2.2.0_alpha110/cvs/Linux x86_64)
Revision
id3tag: Enable support for ID3 metadata
Current consumers:
USE="id3tag":
media-sound/alsaplayer: Enables ID3 tagging with id3tag library
media-sound/audacity: Enables ID3 tagging with id3tag library
media-sound/mpd: Support for ID3 tags
media-sound/sonic-visualiser: Enables ID3 tagging with id3
$
+# $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/media-gfx/graphviz/ChangeLog,v 1.261
2012/06/17 07:12:19 naota Exp $
+
+ 17 Jun 2012; Naohiro Aota graphviz-2.28.0.ebuild:
+ Add ~x86-fbsd. #419621
16 Jun 2012; Samuli Suominen graphviz-2.28.0.ebuild,
metadata.xml:
No change happened to the e
On 06/16/2012 06:59 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
This was noticed recently when getting:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=420569
Also hit this problem today while trying to bump bluez and noticed we
are using elog messages to tell people to manually install
net-dialup/ppp if they want ppp worki
On 06/16/2012 01:05 PM, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
Le vendredi 15 juin 2012 à 21:04 +0200, Pacho Ramos a écrit :
El vie, 15-06-2012 a las 09:03 +0200, Pacho Ramos escribió:
El mar, 12-06-2012 a las 23:02 -0400, Mike Frysinger escribió:
i've noticed a growing trend where people put setup of v
On 06/16/2012 02:21 PM, Fabio Erculiani wrote:
Anything build-time related should not be placed into pkg_setup (I am
That is propably not very accurate statement, like with placing the call
to `enewuser` when you need the user at src_configure(), src_compile() etc.
pointing the finger to th
On 06/15/2012 10:44 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
Using all 3 vars would also likely mean that the diff's for xfce-overlay
* vars -> phases
silly typing error. sorry.
On 06/13/2012 06:02 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
i've noticed a growing trend where people put setup of variables into
pkg_setup that only matter to src_* funcs presumably so they don't have to
call the respective src_* func from an inherited eclass. unfortunately this
adds pointless overhead to bi
301 - 400 of 1133 matches
Mail list logo
